Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/885,067

Improved Fastening Clip

Non-Final OA §102§112
Filed
Sep 13, 2024
Examiner
LAVINDER, JACK W
Art Unit
3677
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Illinois Tool Works Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
65%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 7m
To Grant
93%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 65% — above average
65%
Career Allow Rate
1156 granted / 1771 resolved
+13.3% vs TC avg
Strong +28% interview lift
Without
With
+28.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
34 currently pending
Career history
1805
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.3%
-39.7% vs TC avg
§103
33.5%
-6.5% vs TC avg
§102
35.1%
-4.9% vs TC avg
§112
26.9%
-13.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1771 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
DETAILED ACTION The drawings are objected to under 37 CFR 1.83(a). The drawings must show every feature of the invention specified in the claims. Therefore, the clip for mounting an airbag must be shown or the feature canceled from the claims. No new matter should be entered. Corrected drawing sheets in compliance with 37 CFR 1.121(d) are required in reply to the Office action to avoid abandonment of the application. Any amended replacement drawing sheet should include all of the figures appearing on the immediate prior version of the sheet, even if only one figure is being amended. The figure or figure number of an amended drawing should not be labeled as “amended.” If a drawing figure is to be canceled, the appropriate figure must be removed from the replacement sheet, and where necessary, the remaining figures must be renumbered and appropriate changes made to the brief description of the several views of the drawings for consistency. Additional replacement sheets may be necessary to show the renumbering of the remaining figures. Each drawing sheet submitted after the filing date of an application must be labeled in the top margin as either “Replacement Sheet” or “New Sheet” pursuant to 37 CFR 1.121(d). If the changes are not accepted by the examiner, the applicant will be notified and informed of any required corrective action in the next Office action. The objection to the drawings will not be held in abeyance. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-10 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Regarding claims 1 and 6 and all claims that depend from claims 1 and 6, in the last paragraph and second to last paragraph, respectively, the limitation “each of the at least one resilient spring elements” lacks antecedence. The claim has only defined that there be “at least one resilient spring element”. It is suggested that the limitation be changed to “the at least one resilient spring element” to correct the problem. Also, in claims 1 and 6 and all the claims that depend therefrom, the limitation “across the longitudinal axis” is misdescriptive. The longitudinal axis (228) runs from top to bottom of the fastening clip and runs down the center of the clip. It is misdescriptive to state that the transverse portion extends across the longitudinal access. It is suggested that the limitation be changed to the traverse portion (250, figure 10) extends from one side of the fastener clip to the other while being spaced from and parallel to a side that connects the one side of the fastener clip to the other to correct the problem. Regarding claim 2, line 1, the limitation “each of the at least one intermediate portions” lacks antecedence. It is suggested that the limitation be changed to “the intermediate portion” to correct the problem. Regarding claims 3 and 8, line 1, the limitation “each of the at least one resilient spring elements” lacks antecedence. The claim has only defined that there be “at least one resilient spring element”. It is suggested that the limitation be changed to “the at least one resilient spring element” to correct the problem. Regarding claim 4, line 3, the limitation “the opening” lacks antecedence. It is suggested that the limitation be changed to “the orifice” to correct the problem. Regarding claim 6, line 17, the limitation “the opening” lacks antecedence. It is suggested that the limitation be changed to “the orifice” to correct the problem. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1 and 6-8 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102a(1) as being anticipated by Maschat, US 2015/0300388 A1. Maschat discloses a fastening clip capable of mounting a component, such as a ring to a support structure (panel (7) with an aperture (30). The fastening clip comprising a head portion having a plate (2) arranged to retain a part of the component between the plate (3) and the support structure (7) during use. The fastening clip having a body portion extending from the head portion to a lower end region along a longitudinal axis (A). The body portion comprises at least one elastically deflectable retaining member (12) projecting laterally from said lower end region of the body portion, to engage a surface of the support structure when inserted into an orifice of the support structure (figure 4). At least one resilient spring element (11) extends from the head portion to contact an opposite side of the support structure (figure 4) to the at least one elastically deflectable retaining member (12) to bias the at least one elastically deflectable retaining member (11) into contact with the support structure. The at least one resilient spring element comprises a transverse portion (see annotated drawing) extending in a direction parallel to a side of the body portion connecting one side to another opposite side of the body portion. An intermediate portion (see annotated drawing) extending from an end of the transverse portion between the transverse portion and the plate (2). The intermediate portion being disposed to engage the part of the component when the resilient spring element is deflected towards the plate during use. PNG media_image1.png 510 797 media_image1.png Greyscale PNG media_image2.png 411 560 media_image2.png Greyscale Regarding claim 6, Maschat also discloses the resilient spring element having a longitudinal portion (6) and it shows, in figure 8, the resilient spring element substantially parallel to the support structure (7). Futhermore, Maschat’s device is capable of being used with a thicker support structure that would put the resilient spring element even closer to a parallel orientation relative to the support structure (7). PNG media_image3.png 376 482 media_image3.png Greyscale Regarding claim 7, Maschat discloses the longitudinal portion (6) extending parallel to the longitudinal axis (A). Regarding claim 8, Maschat discloses an intermediate portion extending from the transverse portion between the transverse portion and the head portion. PNG media_image4.png 510 797 media_image4.png Greyscale Claims 1 and 5 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102a(1) as being anticipated by figure 2 in the applicant’s specification, i.e., applicant’s admitted prior art (AAPA). The applicant admits in figure 2 the limitation of the claims 1 and 5 are old. Figure 2 shows a fastening clip (100) mounting a component (luggage ring 120) to a support structure via the lower portion (106) of the fastening clip. The fastening clip comprising a head portion having a plate (102) that retains a part of the component (120) between the plate (102) and the support structure, during use. The fastening clip (100) having a body portion (106) extending from the head portion to a lower end region along a longitudinal axis. The body portion comprises at least one elastically deflectable retaining member (108) projecting laterally from said lower end region (106) of the body portion to engage a surface of the support structure when inserted into an orifice of the support structure. At least one resilient spring element (112) extends from the head portion to contact an opposite side of the support structure to the at least one elastically deflectable retaining member (112) to bias the at least one elastically deflectable retaining member (112) into contact with the support structure. The at least one resilient spring element (112) comprises a transverse portion (see annotated drawing on the subsequent page) extending in a direction parallel to a side of the body portion connecting one side to another opposite side of the body portion. An intermediate portion (see annotated drawing) extending from an end of the transverse portion between the transverse portion and the plate (2). The intermediate portion being disposed to engage the part of the component when the resilient spring element is deflected towards the plate during use. PNG media_image5.png 626 809 media_image5.png Greyscale Allowable Subject Matter Claims 2-4 and 9-10 would be allowable if rewritten to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action and to include all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JACK W LAVINDER whose telephone number is (571)272-7119. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Friday 9-4pm (EST). Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jason San can be reached at 571-272-6531. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. JACK W. LAVINDER Primary Patent Examiner Art Unit 3677 /JACK W LAVINDER/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3677
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 13, 2024
Application Filed
Feb 07, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12599202
BAND AND TIMEPIECE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12599188
HOOK-CLASP STRUCTURE AND UNDERWEAR BACK CLASP
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12595817
FASTENER
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12588740
Adjustable Bracelet
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12584710
ADJUSTABLE,INTERCHANGEABLE HOLSTER
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
65%
Grant Probability
93%
With Interview (+28.1%)
2y 7m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1771 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month