Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/885,067

Improved Fastening Clip

Final Rejection §102§Other
Filed
Sep 13, 2024
Priority
Sep 25, 2023 — EU 23199530.9 +1 more
Examiner
LAVINDER, JACK W
Art Unit
3677
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Illinois Tool Works Inc.
OA Round
2 (Final)
65%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
8m
Est. Remaining
93%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 65% — above average
65%
Career Allowance Rate
1167 granted / 1786 resolved
+13.3% vs TC avg
Strong +28% interview lift
Without
With
+28.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
41 currently pending
Career history
1809
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.3%
-39.7% vs TC avg
§103
54.3%
+14.3% vs TC avg
§102
13.3%
-26.7% vs TC avg
§112
20.3%
-19.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1786 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §Other
DETAILED ACTION Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1, 15 and 20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102a(1) as being anticipated by Maschat, US 2015/0300388 A1. Maschat discloses a fastening clip capable of mounting a component, such as a ring to a support structure (panel (7) with an aperture (30). The fastening clip comprising a head portion having a plate (2) arranged to retain a part of the component between the plate (3) and the support structure (7) during use. The fastening clip having a body portion extending from the head portion to a lower end region along a longitudinal axis (A). The body portion comprises at least one elastically deflectable retaining member (12) projecting laterally from said lower end region of the body portion, to engage a surface of the support structure when inserted into an orifice of the support structure (figure 4). At least one resilient spring element (11) extends from the head portion to contact an opposite side of the support structure (figure 4) to the at least one elastically deflectable retaining member (12) to bias the at least one elastically deflectable retaining member (11) into contact with the support structure. The at least one resilient spring element comprises a transverse portion (see annotated drawing) extending in a direction parallel to a side of the body portion connecting one side to another opposite side of the body portion. The transverse portion extending from one side of the fastening clip to the other while being spaced from and parallel to a side that connects the one side to the other (at elements 13,13). An intermediate portion (see annotated drawing) extending from an end of the transverse portion between the transverse portion and the plate (2). The intermediate portion being disposed to engage the part of the component when the resilient spring element is deflected towards the plate during use. Maschat also discloses a longitudinal portion (5) extending from the head portion in a direction substantially parallel to the longitudinal axis (A). PNG media_image1.png 510 797 media_image1.png Greyscale PNG media_image2.png 411 560 media_image2.png Greyscale Regarding claim 15, Maschat discloses the body portion comprising a box with a pair of openings formed in opposite sides. The at least one elastically deflectable retaining member comprises a pair of resilient arms projecting laterally through the pair of openings. Please see the annotated drawing. PNG media_image3.png 736 595 media_image3.png Greyscale Regarding claim 20, the claim is directed to a fastening clip. The manner in which is made does not further limit the structure of the final clip that is any different from the structure of Maschat’s clip. Furthermore, Maschat discloses that the clip is made from a single piece of metal and common manufacturing techniques of metal cutting, forming and bending are used to form the final shape of the fastening clip ([0042]). Claims 1 and 5 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102a(1) as being anticipated by figure 2 in the applicant’s specification, i.e., applicant’s admitted prior art (AAPA). The applicant admits in figure 2 the limitation of the claims 1 and 5 are old. Figure 2 shows a fastening clip (100) mounting a component (luggage ring 120) to a support structure via the lower portion (106) of the fastening clip. The fastening clip comprising a head portion having a plate (102) that retains a part of the component (120) between the plate (102) and the support structure, during use. The fastening clip (100) having a body portion (106) extending from the head portion to a lower end region along a longitudinal axis. The body portion comprises at least one elastically deflectable retaining member (108) projecting laterally from said lower end region (106) of the body portion to engage a surface of the support structure when inserted into an orifice of the support structure. At least one resilient spring element (112) extends from the head portion to contact an opposite side of the support structure to the at least one elastically deflectable retaining member (112) to bias the at least one elastically deflectable retaining member (112) into contact with the support structure. The at least one resilient spring element (112) comprises a transverse portion (see annotated drawing on the subsequent page) extending in a direction parallel to a side of the body portion connecting one side to another opposite side of the body portion. The transverse portion extending from one side of the fastening clip to the other while being spaced from and parallel to a side that connects the one side to the other (see annotated drawing). An intermediate portion (see annotated drawing) extending from an end of the transverse portion between the transverse portion and the plate (2). The intermediate portion being disposed to engage the part of the component when the resilient spring element is deflected towards the plate during use. The AAPA (figure 2) also discloses a longitudinal portion (112) extending from the head portion in a direction substantially parallel to the longitudinal axis of the body portion. Please see the annotated drawings on the subsequent page. PNG media_image4.png 626 809 media_image4.png Greyscale PNG media_image5.png 626 594 media_image5.png Greyscale Allowable Subject Matter Claims 6-8, 10-14, and 16-19 allowed. Claims 2-4 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed 5/11/2026 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. The applicant argues that amended claim 1 “incorporates subject matter of formerly dependent claim 3”. However, amended claim 1 is missing the limitations defined in claim 2, which were part of dependent claim 3, i.e., claim 3 depended from claim 2. The missing, indicated allowable, limitations of claim 2 are “wherein each of the at least one intermediate portions comprises a tab portion extending towards the transverse portion to contact the transverse portion and limit deflection of the intermediate portion towards the transverse portion during use.” Therefore, the argument is not persuasive because the limitation being argued in not found in the amended claim 1. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JACK W LAVINDER whose telephone number is (571)272-7119. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Friday 9-4pm (EST). Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jason San can be reached at 571-272-6531. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. JACK W. LAVINDER Primary Patent Examiner Art Unit 3677 /JACK W LAVINDER/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3677
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 13, 2024
Application Filed
Feb 13, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §Other
May 11, 2026
Response Filed
Jun 18, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102, §Other (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12678641
D-RING WITH MULTIPLE OPENINGS
2y 4m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12672685
CUMMERBUND TENSIONING SYSTEM
2y 2m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12672701
ATTACHMENT SYSTEM FOR AN ELECTRONIC DEVICE
1y 9m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12669141
VEHICLE MODULE CLIP
2y 7m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12653279
THERMAL COMPENSATION SYSTEM FOR FLUIDIC DECORATION CAPSULE
4y 5m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
65%
Grant Probability
93%
With Interview (+28.1%)
2y 6m (~8m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 1786 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month