Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/885,145

SOUND APPARATUS AND VEHICULAR APPARATUS INCLUDING THE SAME

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Sep 13, 2024
Priority
Sep 15, 2023 — RE 10-2023-0123002
Examiner
KURR, JASON R
Art Unit
2695
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
LG Display Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
75%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
7m
Est. Remaining
96%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 75% — above average
75%
Career Allowance Rate
538 granted / 714 resolved
+13.4% vs TC avg
Strong +20% interview lift
Without
With
+20.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 5m
Avg Prosecution
15 currently pending
Career history
731
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.9%
-38.1% vs TC avg
§103
74.0%
+34.0% vs TC avg
§102
12.1%
-27.9% vs TC avg
§112
9.3%
-30.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 714 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Objections Claim 7 is objected to because of the following informalities: Line 1 of claim 7 discloses in part: “the second electrode part of the first”. It appears the phrase should read as “the second electrode part [[of]] or the first”. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-4, 6 and 10-12 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Kishimoto (US 20010004180 A1). With respect to claim 1, Kishimoto discloses a sound apparatus (figs.3-7), comprising: a sound generating module (#1-3) including a vibration member (#3) and a vibration apparatus (#2) configured at the vibration member (Par.[0042]); and an enclosure (#4,10) connected to the vibration member with an internal space (fig.4 internal space defined by metal plate #3 and substrate #10) therebetween (Par.[0045]), wherein a portion of the vibration apparatus is accommodated at the vibration member (Par.[0042] “In this preferred embodiment, the piezoelectric element 2 is adhered to the metal plate 3 at a position displaced along its length to one side, and thus the other side of the metal plate 3 is exposed as an exposed portion 3a”). With respect to claim 2, Kishimoto discloses the sound apparatus of claim 1, wherein the vibration member comprises a groove part (#4e) accommodating the portion of the vibration apparatus, or wherein the vibration apparatus comprises an electrode layer (#2a) accommodated at the groove part of the vibration member (Par.[0057]). With respect to claim 3, Kishimoto discloses the sound apparatus of claim 1, wherein the vibration apparatus comprises one or more vibration generators (#2), and wherein a portion of the one or more vibration generators is accommodated at the vibration member (Par.[0014][0042] piezoelectric element #2 is a vibration generator that is accommodated at the vibration member #3) . With respect to claim 4, Kishimoto discloses the sound apparatus of claim 3, wherein the one or more vibration generators comprise a vibration generating part (#2), and wherein a portion of the vibration generating part is accommodated at the vibration member (Par.[0014][0042] piezoelectric element #2 is a vibration generating part of the vibration generator that is accommodated at the vibration member #3). With respect to claim 6, Kishimoto discloses the sound apparatus of claim 4, wherein the vibration generating part comprises: a vibration part including a piezoelectric material (fig.6 #2; Par.[0043]); a first electrode part (fig.6 #2a) at a first surface of the vibration part; and a second electrode part (fig.6 #2b) at a second surface different from the first surface of the vibrating part, wherein one of the first electrode part and the second electrode part (fig.6 #2b) is accommodated at the vibration member (fig.6 #3). With respect to claim 10, Kishimoto discloses the sound apparatus of claim 1, further comprising a connection member (fig.4 #6,16) connected to the enclosure, wherein the connection member comprises a first portion (fig.4 #6) and a second portion (fig.4 #16) having different thicknesses (As shown in figures 3,4; portions #6 and #16 comprise different thicknesses in the X-Y plane). With respect to claim 11, Kishimoto discloses the sound apparatus of claim 10, wherein the thickness of the second portion (#16) of the connection member is greater than the thickness of the first portion (#6) of the connection member (See fig.4), and/or wherein the second portion of the connection member is at a periphery portion of the enclosure, and the first portion of the connection member is at a remaining portion, other than the periphery portion, of the enclosure (As shown in figure 4, portion #16 is at a periphery of enclosure #4, and portion #6 is at a remaining portion other than the periphery). With respect to claim 12, Kishimoto discloses the sound apparatus of claim 1, wherein the vibration member (#3) is configured to cover the internal space (#7) of the enclosure, and wherein the enclosure is coupled to a periphery portion of the vibration member (fig.4 connected at periphery via portions #6) and comprises an opening part (#4d) connected to the internal space. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 5 and 7-8 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Kishimoto (US 20010004180 A1) in view of Nakaya et al (US 5684884). With respect to claim 5, Kishimoto discloses the sound apparatus of claim 4, however does not disclose expressly wherein the one or more vibration generators further comprise a cover member covering the vibration generating part, or wherein the vibration apparatus further comprises a cover member attached to the vibration member to cover the vibration generating part. Nakaya discloses a sound apparatus (fig.1 #2) comprising a vibration generator (fig.1 #4,6A-B)(col.5 ln.15-35), wherein the vibration generators further comprises a cover member (fig.1 #8 “support layer”) covering the vibration generating part (col.6 ln.1-11). It would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the present invention to a person of ordinary skill in the art to use the cover member of Nakaya to cover the vibration generating part of Kishimoto. The motivation for doing so would have been to hold the piezoelectric sheet in a curved shape and to matching an acoustic impedance to improve tone quality, see (Nakaya: col.2 ln.40-50). With respect to claim 7, Kishimoto discloses the sound apparatus of claim 6, wherein the second electrode part (fig.6 #2b) of the first electrode part and the second electrode part is accommodated at the vibration member (fig.6 #3), and wherein the one or more vibration generators further comprise: a signal supply member (fig.4 #13,14) electrically connected to the first electrode part and the second electrode part (Par.[0047-0048]). Kishimoto does not disclose expressly a cover member covering the first electrode part. Nakaya discloses a sound apparatus (fig.1 #2) comprising a vibration generator (fig.1 #4) with a first electrode part (fig.1 #6A)(col.5 ln.15-35), further comprising a cover member (fig.1 #8 “support layer”) covering the first electrode part (col.6 ln.1-11). It would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the present invention to a person of ordinary skill in the art to use the cover member of Nakaya to cover the first electrode part of Kishimoto. The motivation for doing so would have been to hold the piezoelectric sheet in a curved shape and to matching an acoustic impedance to improve tone quality, see (Nakaya: col.2 ln.40-50). With respect to claim 8, Kishimoto discloses the sound apparatus of claim 7, wherein the signal supply member comprises: a first signal line (fig.4 #13) electrically connected to the first electrode part between the vibration member and the first electrode part; and a second signal line (fig.4 #14) electrically connected to the second electrode part between the cover member and the second electrode part (Par.[0047-0048]). Claim(s) 9 and 13 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Kishimoto (US 20010004180 A1) in view of Kong et al (US 20130287233 A1). With respect to claim 9, Kishimoto discloses the sound apparatus of claim 1, wherein the vibration apparatus comprises: a first vibration apparatus (fig.6 #2) configured at a first surface of the vibration member (fig.6 #3); however does not disclose expressly and a second vibration apparatus configured at a second surface different from the first surface of the vibration member. Kong discloses a sound apparatus comprising a first vibration apparatus (fig.4 #100) configured at a first surface of a vibration member (fig.4 #200); and a second vibration apparatus (fig.4 #100’) configured at a second surface different from the first surface of the vibration member (Par.[0074-0078]). It would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the present invention to a person of ordinary skill in the art to mount a second vibration apparatus on a second surface of the vibration member of Kishimoto, as performed by Kong. The motivation for doing so would have been to increase an amplitude of the vibration member within a same area by using two vibration apparatuses, as taught by Kong (Par.[0078]). With respect to claim 13, Kishimoto discloses the sound apparatus of claim 12, wherein the vibration apparatus comprises: a first vibration apparatus (fig.6 #2) configured at a first surface of the vibration member (fig.6 #3); however does not disclose expressly a second vibration apparatus connected to a second surface different from the first surface of the vibration member, or connected to the first vibration apparatus. Kong discloses a sound apparatus comprising a first vibration apparatus (fig.4 #100) configured at a first surface of a vibration member (fig.4 #200); and a second vibration apparatus (fig.4 #100’) configured at a second surface different from the first surface of the vibration member (Par.[0074-0078]). It would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the present invention to a person of ordinary skill in the art to mount a second vibration apparatus on a second surface of the vibration member of Kishimoto, as performed by Kong. The motivation for doing so would have been to increase an amplitude of the vibration member within a same area by using two vibration apparatuses, as taught by Kong (Par.[0078]). Claim(s) 14 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Kishimoto (US 20010004180 A1) in view of Kong et al (US 20130287233 A1) and in further view of Bretthauer et al (US 20230362551 A1). With respect to claim 14, Kishimoto discloses the sound apparatus of claim 13, however does not disclose expressly wherein the vibration member comprises one or more holes at a periphery of the vibration apparatus. Bretthauer discloses a sound apparatus comprising a vibration member (fig.4a #20) with at least one or more holes (fig.4b #50) at a periphery of the vibration apparatus (Par.[0090-0092]), and wherein a first and second space are connected to each other through the at least one or more holes (Spaces above and below membrane structure #20 are connected with holes #50). It would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the present invention to a person of ordinary skill in the art to use the holes of Bretthauer in the vibration apparatus of Kishimoto and Kong. The motivation for doing so would have been to provide a structural stiffening of the membrane #20, as taught by Bretthauer See; Par.[0056-0056]. Claim(s) 15 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Kishimoto (US 20010004180 A1) in view of Kong et al (US 20130287233 A1) and in further view of Nakaya et al (US 5684884). With respect to claim 15, Kishimoto discloses the sound apparatus of claim 13, however does not disclose expressly further comprising a protection member at the second vibration apparatus, wherein the protection member is configured to contact the second vibration apparatus and the second surface of the vibration member, or is configured to cover the second vibration apparatus and the second surface of the vibration member. Nakaya discloses a sound apparatus (fig.1 #2) comprising a vibration generator (fig.1 #4,6A-B)(col.5 ln.15-35), wherein the vibration generators further comprises a protection member (fig.1 #8 “support layer”) covering the vibration generating part (col.6 ln.1-11). It would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the present invention to a person of ordinary skill in the art to use the cover member of Nakaya to cover the vibration generating part of Kishimoto and Kong. The motivation for doing so would have been to hold the piezoelectric sheet in a curved shape and to matching an acoustic impedance to improve tone quality, see (Nakaya: col.2 ln.40-50). Claim(s) 16-17 and 20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Kishimoto (US 20010004180 A1) in view of Lee et al (US 20210352390 A1). With respect to claim 16, Kishimoto discloses the at least one or more sound generating apparatuses of claim 1; however does not disclose expressly a vehicular apparatus. Lee discloses a vehicular apparatus comprising: an interior material (fig.1 #130) exposed at an internal space; and at least one or more sound generating apparatuses (fig.1 #30) disposed at the interior material to output a sound to the internal space (Par.[0053-0054]). It would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the present invention to a person of ordinary skill in the art to mount the sound generating apparatus of Kishimoto within an interior material of a vehicle, as performed by Lee. The motivation for doing so would have been to provide an output sound to occupants of the vehicle. With respect to claim 17, Kishimoto discloses the vehicular apparatus of claim 16 in view of Lee, wherein the vibration member in the one or more sound generating apparatuses is configured to cover the internal space of the enclosure (See fig.4), and wherein the enclosure is coupled to a periphery portion of the vibration member and comprises an opening part (fig.4 #4d) connected to the internal space (Par.[0045]). With respect to claim 20, Kishimoto discloses the vehicular apparatus of claim 16 in view of Lee, wherein the interior material (Lee: #130) comprises one or more materials of metal, wood, rubber, plastic, carbon, glass, fiber, cloth, paper, a mirror, and leather, and/or wherein the interior material comprises at least one or more of a dashboard, a pillar interior material, a roof interior material, a door interior material, a seat interior material, a handle interior material, a floor interior material, a rear package interior material, an overhead console, a rear view mirror, a glove box, and a sun visor, and the one or more sound generating apparatuses are configured to vibrate at least one or more of the dashboard, the pillar interior material, the roof interior material, the door interior material, the seat interior material, the handle interior material, the floor interior material, the rear package interior material, the overhead console, the rear view mirror, the glove box, and the sun visor, to generate a sound (Lee: Par.[0054-0058]). Claim(s) 18 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Kishimoto (US 20010004180 A1) in view of Lee et al (US 20210352390 A1) and in further view of Kong et al (US 20130287233 A1). With respect to claim 18, Kishimoto discloses the vehicular apparatus of claim 17 in view of Lee, wherein the vibration apparatus comprises: a first vibration apparatus configured at a first surface of the vibration member; however does not disclose expressly a second vibration apparatus connected to a second surface different from the first surface of the vibration member, or connected to the first vibration apparatus. Kong discloses a sound apparatus comprising a first vibration apparatus (fig.4 #100) configured at a first surface of a vibration member (fig.4 #200); and a second vibration apparatus (fig.4 #100’) configured at a second surface different from the first surface of the vibration member (Par.[0074-0078]). It would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the present invention to a person of ordinary skill in the art to mount a second vibration apparatus on a second surface of the vibration member of Kishimoto and Lee, as performed by Kong. The motivation for doing so would have been to increase an amplitude of the vibration member within a same area by using two vibration apparatuses, as taught by Kong (Par.[0078]). Claim(s) 19 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Kishimoto (US 20010004180 A1) in view of Lee et al (US 20210352390 A1) and in further view of Sato (US 20200359128). With respect to claim 19, Kishimoto discloses the vehicular apparatus of claim 17 in view of Lee, however does not disclose expressly further comprising a coupling part configured to couple the enclosure in the one or more sound generating apparatuses to the interior material, wherein the coupling part comprises a hollow part connected to the internal space of the enclosure through the opening part of the enclosure. Sato discloses a coupling part (fig.2 #14) configured to couple an enclosure (fig.2 #1) in one or more sound generating apparatuses (fig.2 #3) to an interior material (fig.2 #7), wherein the coupling part comprises a hollow part (fig.2 #103) connected to the internal space of the enclosure through the opening part of the enclosure. It would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the present invention to a person of ordinary skill in the art to use the coupling part of Sato mount the enclosure of Kishimoto to the interior material of Lee. The motivation or doing so would have been to provide a sound outlet for direct propagation of acoustic waves from the sound generating apparatus into the interior space of the vehicle. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Storm (US 9113248 B2) discloses a diaphragm arrangement for generating sound. Hamada et al (US 7141919 B1) discloses a piezoelectric electroacoustic transducer. Takeshima et al (US 6969942 B2) discloses a piezoelectric electroacoustic transducer. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JASON R KURR whose telephone number is (571)270-5981. The examiner can normally be reached M-F: 9-5. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Vivian Chin can be reached at (571-272-7848. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. JASON R. KURR Primary Examiner Art Unit 2695 /JASON R KURR/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2695
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 13, 2024
Application Filed
Jul 07, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12684304
METHODS AND APPARATUS TO GENERATE BINAURAL SOUNDS FOR HEARING DEVICES
4y 1m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12673594
ACOUSTIC HEADREST WITH ADJUSTABLE SURFACE
3y 0m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12677089
CHARGING BOX, CHARGING BOX CONTROL METHOD AND APPARATUS, EARPHONE ASSEMBLY, AND READABLE STORAGE MEDIUM
2y 5m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12671949
SYNCHRONIZED AUDIO STREAMING FROM MULTIPLE CONTROLLERS
2y 9m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12671926
CONTROL METHOD AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE
2y 8m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
75%
Grant Probability
96%
With Interview (+20.5%)
2y 5m (~7m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 714 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month