Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 18, 2026
Application No. 18/885,533

STOCK FOR A FIREARM

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Sep 13, 2024
Examiner
DAVID, MICHAEL D
Art Unit
3641
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Caracal International LLC
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
82%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 1m
To Grant
96%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 82% — above average
82%
Career Allow Rate
361 granted / 443 resolved
+29.5% vs TC avg
Moderate +14% lift
Without
With
+14.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 1m
Avg Prosecution
17 currently pending
Career history
460
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.8%
-39.2% vs TC avg
§103
36.7%
-3.3% vs TC avg
§102
29.6%
-10.4% vs TC avg
§112
19.4%
-20.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 443 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . DETAILED ACTION Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1–4, 10–12 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Faifer (US 8,191,299 B2). Regarding claim 1, Faifer discloses a stock for a firearm (firearm stock 10 having buffer-tube holder 12, Figs. 1–5; col. 3, lines 20–33) comprising:(a) a body defining a passage with a forward opening configured to receive a rearwardly extending tube (buffer-tube holder 12 including bore 14 receiving buffer tube 50 through a forward opening, Figs. 2–3);(b) the passage configured to closely receive the tube (bore 14 dimensioned to snugly receive buffer tube 50, Figs. 2–3);(c) a first wall portion defining a first portion of the passage and configured to conformally contact a first cylindrical portion of the tube (upper wall of bore 14 engaging the outer surface of buffer tube 50, Figs. 3–4);(d) a second wall portion facing a second portion of the tube and spaced apart from it (side and lower wall regions of bore 14, Figs. 3–4); and(e) a flexible support element connected to the second wall portion and extending to contact the tube (flaps 18 defined by U-shaped slot 16, extending inward with pads 26 and 28 contacting the side of the tube and its rail, Figs. 4–5). Regarding claim 2, Faifer shows the upper portion of bore 14 as the first wall portion contacting the tube (Figs. 3–4). Regarding claim 3, Faifer shows the lower surface of the upper wall of bore 14 as an elongated cylindrical section conforming to the tube (Figs. 3–4). Regarding claim 4, Faifer shows the second wall portion below the first wall portion (Figs. 3–4). Regarding claim 10, Faifer shows flaps 18 with inner pad 26 and outer portion forming a curved cylindrical contact surface configured to engage a selected cylindrical portion of the tube (Fig. 5). Regarding claim 11, Faifer shows the stock body and support members formed as a single unitary structure of polymeric material in buffer-tube holder 12 (Figs. 2–5). Regarding claim 12, Faifer shows the stock as a single molded plastic form (Figs. 2–5). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103(a) which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: (a) A patent may not be obtained though the invention is not identically disclosed or described as set forth in section 102 of this title, if the differences between the subject matter sought to be patented and the prior art are such that the subject matter as a whole would have been obvious at the time the invention was made to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which said subject matter pertains. Patentability shall not be negatived by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries set forth in Graham v. John Deere Co., 383 U.S. 1, 148 USPQ 459 (1966), that are applied for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. Claims 5-9 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over Faifer (US 8,191,299 B2) in view of Heayn (US 7,162,822 B1). Regarding claim 5, Faifer discloses flexible flaps 18 extending inward from the side wall of bore 14 (Figs. 3–5) that contact the buffer tube 50 and provide localized support. However, Faifer does not disclose that the flexible support element is elongated along the entire length of the passage. Heayn, in the same field of adjustable buttstocks (Figs. 2A–4B), teaches a lower receiver extension 120 and locking pin 150 assembly extending longitudinally through bore 300 of buttstock body 190 to provide continuous support and axial positioning. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to extend Faifer’s flexible member along the bore length as taught by Heayn to distribute contact forces and reduce play along the receiver-tube interface, a known design objective in collapsible stocks. Regarding claim 6, Heayn further teaches spring-loaded, compliant interfaces between the stock body 190 and the lower receiver extension 120 (Figs. 2A–4B) that articulate under load. Adapting Faifer’s flexible flap 18 to include an articulated or contoured cross-section that deforms in a similar manner would have been an obvious variation to provide controlled compliance. Regarding claim 7, Heayn further teaches opposing sidewall structures about the lower receiver extension 120 that act together to stabilize the stock (Figs. 2A–4B). Providing a pair of flexible members on opposite sides of Faifer’s bore 14 following that symmetrical configuration would have been an obvious modification to increase lateral stability. Regarding claim 8, Heayn further teaches a longitudinal channel between the lower wall of bore 300 and the lever-pin assembly (Figs. 2A–3B). Forming a channel between Faifer’s paired flexible members to provide clearance or guide alignment would have been an obvious implementation of that known structure. Regarding claim 9, Heayn further teaches detents 22 on the lower receiver extension 120 that cooperate with the pin head 24 to prevent rotation of the buttstock 190 relative to the extension 120 (Figs. 2A–3B). Configuring the channel defined by Faifer’s flexible members to receive a lower spline portion of the tube for the same purpose would have been an obvious anti-rotation improvement. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MICHAEL D DAVID whose telephone number is (571)270-3737 and whose email address is michael.david@uspto.gov*. The examiner can normally be reached on M-F 8:30am-5:00pm EST. *Communications via Internet e-mail are at the discretion of the applicant. Applicant is welcome to file an electronic communication authorization (sb439) form at any time if he/she would like to communicate via e-mail: https://www.uspto.gov/sites/default/files/documents/sb0439.pdfWithout a written authorization by applicant in place, the USPTO will not respond via Internet e-mail to any Internet correspondence which contains information subject to the confidentiality requirement as set forth in 35 U.S.C. 122. A paper copy of such correspondence will be placed in the appropriate patent application. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Troy Chambers can be reached on 571-272-6874. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /MICHAEL D DAVID/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3641
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 13, 2024
Application Filed
Nov 01, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103
Feb 16, 2026
Interview Requested
Mar 25, 2026
Response Filed
Mar 25, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Mar 26, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12602519
SYSTEMS FOR AUTOMATED BLAST DESIGN PLANNING AND METHODS RELATED THERETO
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12601560
BUFFER TUBE APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12584702
Grip Module for Handgun
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12578157
AMMUNITION MAGAZINE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12571601
Charging Slide for Foldable Firearm
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
82%
Grant Probability
96%
With Interview (+14.3%)
2y 1m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 443 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month