Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 28, 2026
Application No. 18/885,738

Layered Detection Method and Layered Detection System

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Sep 15, 2024
Priority
Jun 18, 2024 — TW 113122521
Examiner
FOX, DANIELLE A
Art Unit
2884
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Advanced Acebiotek Co. Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
83%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
10m
Est. Remaining
96%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 83% — above average
83%
Career Allowance Rate
602 granted / 725 resolved
+15.0% vs TC avg
Moderate +13% lift
Without
With
+13.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
23 currently pending
Career history
740
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.7%
-38.3% vs TC avg
§103
63.9%
+23.9% vs TC avg
§102
26.8%
-13.2% vs TC avg
§112
1.9%
-38.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 725 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-6 and 9-20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by US 2021/0356394 (Wallace). Regarding claim 1, Wallace disclose a layered detection method, comprising: generating a terahertz emission electromagnetic wave (Fig. 7, via 104, T1), and emitting the terahertz emission electromagnetic wave at any angle to a solid material (102); detecting a plurality of terahertz emission electromagnetic waves reflected or transmitted after the terahertz emission electromagnetic wave is incident on the solid material and passes through an entire thickness of the solid material in a first direction (Fig. 7, via 104, R1 and R2); measuring and analyzing a plurality of characteristic signals according to the terahertz emission electromagnetic wave and the plurality of terahertz reception electromagnetic waves, to distinguish the solid material along the first direction into a plurality of parallel layers, and determine a plurality of characteristics of the plurality of layers (Fig. 7, R1 and R2); and determining at least one defect information of each layer of the plurality of layers according to the plurality of characteristics of the plurality of layers [0070]. Regarding claim 2, Wallace disclose the layered detection method of claim 1, wherein a frequency of the terahertz emission electromagnetic wave is between 1011Hz and 1013Hz ([0043] and [0068]). Regarding claim 3, Wallace disclose the layered detection method of claim 1, wherein the plurality of characteristic signals comprise an electric field intensity, an electric field frequency and an electric field phase of each of the plurality of terahertz reception electromagnetic waves [0079]. Regarding claim 4, Wallace disclose the layered detection method of claim 3, wherein the plurality of characteristic signals further comprise at least one spectral electric field between the plurality of terahertz reception electromagnetic waves, and each spectral electric field comprises an electric field amplitude, an electric field phase, and an electric field polarization (Fig. 7). Regarding claim 5, Wallace disclose the layered detection method of claim 1, wherein the plurality of characteristics comprise at least one of an electrical coefficient and an optical coefficient of each of the plurality of layers (Fig. 7, [0067]). Regarding claim 6, Wallace disclose the layered detection method of claim 5, wherein the electrical coefficient is at least one of a conductivity, a resistivity, a doping concentration, a dielectric constant and a charge carrier mobility, and the optical coefficient is at least one of an absorptance, a refractive index, a reflectivity and a transmittance (Fig. 7, [0067]). Regarding claim 9, Wallace disclose the layered detection method of claim 1, wherein the at least one detect information is at least one information of material inhomogeneity, bubbles or porosity, uneven mixing of multiple materials, residual stress, crystal dislocation, uneven doping concentration [0074]. Regarding claim 10, Wallace disclose the layered detection method of claim 1, wherein the first direction is normal to at least one interface between the plurality of layers (Fig. 7). Regarding claim 11, Wallace disclose a layered detection system, comprising: a terahertz electromagnetic wave generator (104), configured to generate a terahertz emission electromagnetic wave, and emit the terahertz emission electromagnetic wave at any angle to a solid material (Fig. 7); a terahertz electromagnetic wave receiver (104), configured to detect a plurality of terahertz emission electromagnetic waves reflected or transmitted after the terahertz emission electromagnetic wave is incident on the solid material and passes through an entire thickness of the solid material in a first direction (Fig. 7); and a detection device, coupled to the terahertz electromagnetic wave generator and the terahertz electromagnetic wave receiver, configured to measure and analyze a plurality of characteristic signals according to the terahertz emission electromagnetic wave and the plurality of terahertz reception electromagnetic waves (Fig. 7), to distinguish the solid material along the first direction into a plurality of parallel layers (Fig. 7), and determine a plurality of characteristics of the plurality of layers ([0068]-[0070]), and to determine at least one defect information of each layer of the plurality of layers according to the plurality of characteristics of the plurality of layers ([0068]-[0070]). Regarding claim 12, Wallace disclose the layered detection system of claim 11, wherein a frequency of the terahertz emission electromagnetic wave is between 1011Hz and 1013Hz ([0043] and [0068]). Regarding claim 13, Wallace disclose the layered detection system of claim 11, wherein the plurality of characteristic signals comprise an electric field intensity, an electric field frequency and an electric field phase of each of the plurality of terahertz reception electromagnetic waves ([0068]-[0070]). Regarding claim 14, Wallace disclose the layered detection system of claim 13, wherein the plurality of characteristic signals further comprise at least one spectral electric field between the plurality of terahertz reception electromagnetic waves, and each spectral electric field comprises an electric field amplitude, an electric field phase, and an electric field polarization (Fig. 7). Regarding claim 15, Wallace disclose the layered detection system of claim 11, wherein the plurality of characteristics comprise at least one of an electrical coefficient and an optical coefficient of each of the plurality of layers (Fig. 7, [0067]). Regarding claim 16, Wallace disclose the layered detection system of claim 15, wherein the electrical coefficient is at least one of a conductivity, a resistivity, a doping concentration, a dielectric constant and a charge carrier mobility, and the optical coefficient is at least one of an absorptance, a refractive index, a reflectivity and a transmittance (Fig. 7, [0067]). Regarding claim 17, Wallace disclose the layered detection system of claim 11, wherein the solid material is selected from one or more of a semiconductor wafer, a ceramic material, and a polymer material. Please note that the “the solid material” is drawn to a material worked upon by the apparatus, which does not limit apparatus claims. See MPEP 2115. Regarding claim 18, Wallace disclose the layered detection system of claim 17, wherein the semiconductor wafer is at least one of a silicon wafer (Si), a germanium wafer (Ge), a silicon carbide (SiC), a gallium arsenide (GaAs), a gallium nitride (GaN), a gallium phosphide (GaP), a cadmium sulfide (CdS), an indium phosphide (InP), a zinc oxide (ZnO), a gallium oxide (Ga2O3), and an aluminum nitride (AlN). Please note that the “the semiconductor wafer” is drawn to a material worked upon by the apparatus, which does not limit apparatus claims. See MPEP 2115. Regarding claim 19, Wallace disclose the layered detection system of claim 11, wherein the at least one detect information is at least one information of material inhomogeneity, bubbles or porosity, uneven mixing of multiple materials, residual stress, crystal dislocation, uneven doping concentration [0074]. Regarding claim 20, Wallace disclose the layered detection system of claim 11, wherein the first direction is normal to at least one interface between the plurality of layers (Fig 7). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 7 and 8 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over US 2021/0356394 (Wallace). Regarding claim 7, Wallace disclose the layered detection method of claim 1, but fails to teach wherein the solid material is selected from one or more of a semiconductor wafer, a ceramic material, and a polymer material. However, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was filed to use the known technique disclosed by Wallace on to a known product in the same way to yield predictable results. See MPEP 2143. Regarding claim 8, Wallace disclose the layered detection method of claim 7, wherein the semiconductor wafer is at least one of a silicon wafer (Si), a germanium wafer (Ge), a silicon carbide (SiC), a gallium arsenide (GaAs), a gallium nitride (GaN), a gallium phosphide (GaP), a cadmium sulfide (CdS), an indium phosphide (InP), a zinc oxide (ZnO), a gallium oxide (Ga2O3), and an aluminum nitride (AlN) (Fig. 7, as made obvious above). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to DANI FOX whose telephone number is (571)272-3513. The examiner can normally be reached M-F: 9-5. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, David Makiya can be reached at 571-272-2273. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /DANI FOX/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2884
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 15, 2024
Application Filed
Feb 26, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103
May 07, 2026
Response Filed

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12635963
THREE DIMENSIONAL X-RAY IMAGING SYSTEM
4y 1m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12635968
RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGING APPARATUS FOR OBTAINING IMPROVED RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGES AND OPERATION METHOD THEREOF
1y 10m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12629120
MAMMOGRAPHY APPARATUS AND SAMPLE IMAGING ASSISTANCE SET
1y 8m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12631579
XRF AND CALCIMETRY EVALUATION OF MULTIPHASE OILFIELD FLUIDS
1y 8m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12622654
COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY APPARATUS
2y 9m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
83%
Grant Probability
96%
With Interview (+13.4%)
2y 7m (~10m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 725 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month