DETAILED ACTION
Response to Amendment
Applicant’s amendments filed 2/2/26 have been entered. Currently claims 1, 3-7, and 9-16 are pending and claims 2 and 8 has been cancelled.
Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103
The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action:
A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made.
Claims 1, 3, 5, are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Shiori (JP 2019127571 which has been machine translated) in view of Hunter (WO 2010098966 which has been machine translated).
Shiori discloses a resin composition for an insulating layer comprising a polybutadiene skeleton, an epoxy resin, an active ester curing agent and an inorganic filler (abs). The polybutadiene has the same general formula as claimed which can be seen on page 6 with formulas a1-a3, a-7 and the composition comprises aromatic amine curing accelerators (part f). Shiori does disclose bisphenol A type epoxy resins as well as glycidyl ester type resins, however is silent to the specific epoxy resin and aromatic amine.
Hunter discloses an epoxy resin composition useful for circuit boards that can have an epoxidized polybutadiene, diglycidyl ether of bisphenol a and aromatic amine curing agents such as Metaphenylene Diamine.
It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to have modified Shiori and used the epoxy resin of diglycidyl ether of bisphenol a as well as metaphenylene diamine as it’s a known epoxy resin and amine curing agent used within circuit boards and Shiori discloses both diglycidyl and bisphenol A epoxy resins and aromatic curing agents.
As to claim 5, Shiori discloses the use of inorganic fillers.
Claims 1, 3-6, are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Shiori (JP 2019127571 which has been machine translated) in view of Mizuno (WO 2020194920 which has been machine translated).
Shiori discloses a resin composition for an insulating layer comprising a polybutadiene skeleton, an epoxy resin, an active ester curing agent and an inorganic filler (abs). The polybutadiene has the same general formula as claimed which can be seen on page 6 with formulas a1-a3, a-7 and the composition comprises aromatic amine curing accelerators (part f). Shiori does disclose bisphenol A type epoxy resins as well as glycidyl ester type resins, however is silent to the specific epoxy resin and aromatic amine.
Mizuno discloses a circuit board comprising an epoxy resin, an aromatic amine a boron-phosphorus complex used within the composition. The boron-phosphorus complex has general formula 2 which is the same as claimed and phosphorus complex formula 3 (Paragraphs 12-16.) Further the epoxy resin can be a di glycidyl etherified products of Bisphenols.
It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to have modified Shiori and used the material of Mizuno as they are known material used within circuit boards and Shiori discloses the use of diglycidyl and bisphenol A epoxy resins and aromatic curing agents.
As to claim 5, Shiori discloses the use of inorganic fillers.
As to claim 6, Shiori discloses the use of boron nitride filler however is silent to the volume amount of filler.
Mizuno discloses boron nitride filler in an amount of 40 to 80 volume percent and can be the only filler present.
It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to have modified Shiori work and used the boron nitride filler as the only filler in an amount of 50% or more as Mizuno discloses overlapping ranges as claimed and Shiori discloses the same filler as claimed as this filler would help provide excellent electrical insulation and thermal conductivity.
Claims 7 and 9-16 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Shiori (JP 2019127571 which has been machine translated) and Mizuno (WO 2020194920 which has been machine translated) in view of Kotake (WO 2012099131 which has been machine translated).
As to claims 7, 12-14, Shiori discloses a resin composition for an insulating layer comprising a polybutadiene skeleton, an epoxy resin, an active ester curing agent and an inorganic filler (abs). The polybutadiene has the same general formula as claimed which can be seen on page 6 with formulas a1-a3, a-7 and the composition comprises aromatic amine curing accelerators (part f). Shiori does disclose bisphenol A type epoxy resins as well as glycidyl ester type resins, however is silent to the specific epoxy resin and aromatic amine as well as a phase separated structure and glass transition temperatures.
Mizuno discloses a circuit board comprising an epoxy resin, an aromatic amine a boron-phosphorus complex used within the composition. The boron-phosphorus complex has general formula 2 which is the same as claimed and phosphorus complex formula 3 (Paragraphs 12-16.) Further the epoxy resin can be a di glycidyl etherified products of Bisphenols.
It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to have modified Shiori and used the material of Mizuno as they are known material used within circuit boards and Shiori discloses the use of diglycidyl and bisphenol A epoxy resins and aromatic curing agents.
Kotake discloses an epoxy resin composition for use in a circuit board comprising a phase separated structure for the epoxy resin.
It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to have modified Shiori and Mizuno formed the structure of Kotake because it would provide the composition to have low heat expansion and excellent warping characteristics.
As to the glass transition temperature the combination of Shiori and Mizuno and Kotake disclose the same materials for the same use as claimed and therefore would inherently have the claimed glass transition temperature.
As to claim 9-11, Shiori discloses the substrate can be a metal foil layer and a metal foil layer over the insulating layer used for a circuit pattern for a circuit board.
As to claim 15, Shiori discloses the use of inorganic fillers.
As to claim 16, Shiori discloses the use of boron nitride filler however is silent to the volume amount of filler.
Mizuno discloses boron nitride filler in an amount of 40 to 80 volume percent and can be the only filler present.
It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to have modified Shiori work and used the boron nitride filler as the only filler in an amount of 50% or more as Mizuno discloses overlapping ranges as claimed and Shiori discloses the same filler as claimed as this filler would help provide excellent electrical insulation and thermal conductivity.
Claims 7, 9-13 and 15 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Shiori (JP 2019127571 which has been machine translated) and Hunter (WO 2010098966 which has been machine translated) in view of Kotake (WO 2012099131 which has been machine translated).
As to claims 7, 12 and 13, Shiori discloses a resin composition for an insulating layer comprising a polybutadiene skeleton, an epoxy resin, an active ester curing agent and an inorganic filler (abs). The polybutadiene has the same general formula as claimed which can be seen on page 6 with formulas a1-a3, a-7 and the composition comprises aromatic amine curing accelerators (part f). Shiori does disclose bisphenol A type epoxy resins as well as glycidyl ester type resins, however is silent to the specific epoxy resin and aromatic amine as well as a phase separated structure and glass transition temperatures.
Hunter discloses an epoxy resin composition useful for circuit boards that can have an epoxidized polybutadiene, diglycidyl ether of bisphenol a and aromatic amine curing agents such as Metaphenylene Diamine.
It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to have modified Shiori and used the epoxy resin of diglycidyl ether of bisphenol a as well as metaphenylene diamine as it’s a known epoxy resin and amine curing agent used within circuit boards and Shiori discloses both diglycidyl and bisphenol A epoxy resins and aromatic curing agents.
Kotake discloses an epoxy resin composition for use in a circuit board comprising a phase separated structure for the epoxy resin.
It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to have modified Shiori and Hunter and formed the structure of Kotake because it would provide the composition to have low heat expansion and excellent warping characteristics.
As to the glass transition temperature the combination of Shiori and Hunter and Kotake disclose the same materials for the same use as claimed and therefore would inherently have the claimed glass transition temperature.
As to claim 9-11, Shiori discloses the substrate can be a metal foil layer and a metal foil layer over the insulating layer used for a circuit pattern for a circuit board.
As to claim 15, Shiori discloses the use of inorganic fillers.
Response to Arguments
Applicant's arguments filed 2/2/26 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive.
Applicant’s argue that the combination of Shiori and either Hunter or Mizuno fail to teach the amended versions of claims 1 and 7 as it would not have been obvious. The examiner respectfully disagrees and argues that Shiori teaches the boarder genus of epoxy resins but doesn’t specifically teach the claimed resin however it would have been obvious to use the resins chosen in either Mizuno or Hunter as Shiori teaches overlapping scope. The resins of either Mizuno and Hunter show these epoxies are suitable alternatives and applicants have not provided/shown unexpectedly better results.
Conclusion
Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a).
A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action.
Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to CHRISTOPHER M POLLEY whose telephone number is (571)270-5734. The examiner can normally be reached Monday through Friday from 8am till 4:30 pm.
Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice.
If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Mark Ruthkosky can be reached at 5712721291. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300.
Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000.
/CHRISTOPHER M POLLEY/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1785
Prosecution Insights