Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 05, 2026
Application No. 18/886,660

MEMORY SYSTEM, ELECTRONIC PRODUCT AND OPERATING METHOD OF MEMORY SYSTEM

Final Rejection §112
Filed
Sep 16, 2024
Priority
May 17, 2024 — CN 2024106221232
Examiner
ABRAHAM, ESAW T
Art Unit
2112
Tech Center
2100 — Computer Architecture & Software
Assignee
Yangtze Memory Technologies Co., Ltd.
OA Round
2 (Final)
94%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
4m
Est. Remaining
97%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 94% — above average
94%
Career Allowance Rate
1016 granted / 1079 resolved
+39.2% vs TC avg
Minimal +3% lift
Without
With
+3.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 1m
Avg Prosecution
22 currently pending
Career history
1107
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
15.5%
-24.5% vs TC avg
§103
17.9%
-22.1% vs TC avg
§102
22.8%
-17.2% vs TC avg
§112
21.8%
-18.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1079 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION - Applicant's response filed 02/05/26 has been considered. - Claims 1, 2, 11, 13, 15, 16, and 18 are amended, claims 12 and 17 are canceled, and claims 21 and 22 are added. Thus, claims 1-11, 13-16, and 18-22 are pending in the present application. The rejection under 35 U.S.C. § 112, second paragraph and 102(a)(2) are withdrawn in view of applicant's amendments. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION. The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-10 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor, or for pre-AIA the applicant regards as the invention. Claim 1 recites the limitation "the control terminal" in line 8. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Claims 2-10 are also rejected based on virtue of their dependencies on the rejected base claim 1. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 11, 13-16, and 18-20 are allowed. The following is an Examiner's statement of reasons for allowance: The Examiner in view of the Applicant Amendment filed on 02/05/26, where the applicant amended independent claims 11 and 16 to include all the pertinent limitations of claims 12 and 17 and cancelled claims 12 and 17, allows the independent claims 11 and 16. Dependent depend from allowable independent claims and inherently include limitations therein and therefore are allowed as well. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any extension fee pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ESAW T ABRAHAM whose telephone number is (571)272-3812. The examiner can normally be reached on 8AM-4:30PM EST M-F. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner'ssupervisor, Albert DeCady can be reached on (571) 272-3819. The fax phonenumber for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is(703) 872-9306. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Esaw T Abraham/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2112
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 16, 2024
Application Filed
Nov 26, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112
Feb 03, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Feb 03, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
Feb 05, 2026
Response Filed
Jun 10, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12659074
Communication Method, Apparatus, and System
2y 0m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12659078
COMMUNICATION APPARATUS, COMMUNICATION METHOD, AND COMMUNICATION SYSTEM
2y 0m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12656975
Separation of Parity Columns in Bit-Flip Decoding of Low-Density Parity-Check Codes with Pipelining and Column Parallelism
2y 0m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12658942
DECODER SCHEME CAPABLE OF REDUCING FREQUENCY OF MEMORY READING AND WRITING DURING ITERATIVE DECODING PROCEDURE
1y 6m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12652061
MEMORY SYSTEM AND CONTROL METHOD
1y 9m to grant Granted Jun 09, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
94%
Grant Probability
97%
With Interview (+3.2%)
2y 1m (~4m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 1079 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month