Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/887,836

ELECTRONIC COMPONENT AND METHOD FOR CLEANING BONDING TOOL

Non-Final OA §102§Other
Filed
Sep 17, 2024
Examiner
KARLS, SHAY LYNN
Art Unit
3723
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Murata Manufacturing Co. Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
69%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 8m
To Grant
96%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 69% — above average
69%
Career Allow Rate
903 granted / 1308 resolved
-1.0% vs TC avg
Strong +27% interview lift
Without
With
+26.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 8m
Avg Prosecution
53 currently pending
Career history
1361
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
46.7%
+6.7% vs TC avg
§102
34.0%
-6.0% vs TC avg
§112
14.5%
-25.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1308 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §Other
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of group I, in the reply filed on 2/2/26 is acknowledged. Claims 13-20 are withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b) as being drawn to a nonelected invention, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Election was made without traverse in the reply filed on 2/2/26. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-12 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102a1 as being anticipated by JP 4840117. With regards to claim 1, ‘117 teaches an electronic component comprising: a package (S1); an electronic chip (20) housed within an enclosure inside the package; a first bonding pad (21); a second bonding pad (surface on 30) configured to establish an electrical connection between the electronic chip and surrounding circuitry; a bond (40) connected to at least one of the first bonding pad or the second bonding pad; and a cleaning pad (50) housed in the package, wherein the cleaning pad is spaced from the first bonding pad and the second bonding pad (figure 1 show the spacing between 50 and 20) , and the cleaning pad is configured to be electrically disconnected from other structures or components and to enable cleaning of a bonding tool. With regards to claim 2, the cleaning pad comprises a wire bondable material (gold or copper). With regards to claim 3 and 4, wherein the cleaning pad comprises at least one of gold, nickel, silver, copper, cobalt, aluminum, tungsten, titanium, or a combination thereof (gold and copper). With regards to claim 5 and 6, the first bonding pad, the second bonding pad, and the cleaning pad comprise at least one of gold, nickel, silver, copper, cobalt, aluminum, tungsten, titanium, or a combination thereof (gold or copper). With regards to claim 7, the bond comprises a wire bond (40). With regards to claim 8, the cleaning pad is configured to enable cleaning of the bonding tool by forming a second bond on the cleaning pad, and wherein the second bond only extends within an area of the cleaning pad (figure 3a-b and 4a-b). With regards to claim 9, a surface area of the cleaning pad is at least two times as large as a surface area of a smallest bonding pad from the first bonding pad or the second bonding pad (the cleaning pad 50 is at least two times as large as the first bonding pad 21). With regards to claim 10 and 11, the surface area of the cleaning pad is at least two times as large as a surface area of a largest bonding pad from the first bonding pad or the second bonding pad (the cleaning pad 50 is at least two times as large as the first bonding pad 21). With regards to claim 12, the electronic component comprises a single case component (figure 1). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to SHAY LYNN KARLS whose telephone number is (571)272-1268. The examiner can normally be reached M-Th (6am-5pm). Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Monica Carter can be reached at 571-272-4475. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /SHAY KARLS/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3723
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 17, 2024
Application Filed
Mar 26, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §Other (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12594588
Sucker Rod Wiping Tool
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12583012
LOCKING ASSEMBLY AND ROLLER ASSEMBLY EMPLOYING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12576318
TOWEL WITH INTEGRATED BRUSH
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12575662
TOOTHBRUSH WITH REPLACEABLE BRUSH HEAD
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12569324
ORAL CARE SYSTEM, IMPLEMENT, AND/OR KIT
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
69%
Grant Probability
96%
With Interview (+26.6%)
2y 8m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1308 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month