Prosecution Insights
Last updated: September 17, 2026
Application No. 18/888,376

Substituted Amine Compounds, Compositions and Methods of Use

Non-Final OA §102§112
Filed
Sep 18, 2024
Priority
Sep 20, 2023 — provisional 63/584,045 +2 more
Examiner
HASTINGS, ALISON AZAR
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Deep Apple Therapeutics Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
64%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 3m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 64% of resolved cases
64%
Career Allowance Rate
54 granted / 84 resolved
+4.3% vs TC avg
Strong +39% interview lift
Without
With
+39.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 3m
Avg Prosecution
49 currently pending
Career history
114
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.0%
-38.0% vs TC avg
§103
33.0%
-7.0% vs TC avg
§102
18.5%
-21.5% vs TC avg
§112
25.3%
-14.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 84 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority Applicant’s claim for the benefit of a prior-filed application under 35 U.S.C. 119(e) or under 35 U.S.C. 120, 121, 365(c), or 386(c) is acknowledged. Applicant has not complied with one or more conditions for receiving the benefit of an earlier filing date under 35 U.S.C. 119(e) as follows: The later-filed application must be an application for a patent for an invention which is also disclosed in the prior application (the parent or original nonprovisional application or provisional application). The disclosure of the invention in the parent application and in the later-filed application must be sufficient to comply with the requirements of 35 U.S.C. 112(a) or the first paragraph of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, except for the best mode requirement. See Transco Products, Inc. v. Performance Contracting, Inc., 38 F.3d 551, 32 USPQ2d 1077 (Fed. Cir. 1994). The disclosure of the prior-filed applications, Application No. 63/584,045, 63/640,903, 63/678,839, fails to provide adequate support or enablement in the manner provided by 35 U.S.C. 112(a) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, first paragraph for one or more claims of this application. A claim by claim analysis indicated a lack of support for the structures of claims 1, 3, 7, 24 , 26, 29, 31, 8-9, 11-12, 15, 17-18, 20, 106-112 in PRO 63/584,045 due to a lack of requirement for formula (I) having different Rd and Rd*. Thus a date of 05/01/2024 was used for priority for these claims. A claim by claim analysis indicated a lack of support for the structures of claims 22, 33, 35, 37, 38, 39, 42, 82, 87, 91, 96, 98-100 in PRO 63/640,903, such as the rings of ring B or A, or the optionally substituted 3-6-memebered ring fused to ring A. Thus a date of 08/02/2024 was used for priority for these claims. A claim by claim analysis indicated a lack of support for the structures of claims 40, 45, 102-103 in PRO 63/678,839, such as the specific ring A structures or the compounds of claims 102-103. Thus a date of 09/18/2024 was used for priority for these claims. Specification The title of the invention is not descriptive. A new title is required that is clearly indicative of the invention to which the claims are directed. The following title is suggested: SUBSTITUTED AMINE COMPOUNDS FOR MRGPRX2 MODULATION. The disclosure is objected to because it contains an embedded hyperlink (see page 271) and/or other form of browser-executable code. Applicant is required to delete the embedded hyperlink and/or other form of browser-executable code; references to websites should be limited to the top-level domain name without any prefix such as http:// or other browser-executable code. See MPEP § 608.01. Applicant is reminded of the proper content of an abstract of the disclosure. In chemical patent abstracts for compounds or compositions, the general nature of the compound or composition should be given as well as its use, e.g., “The compounds are of the class of alkyl benzene sulfonyl ureas, useful as oral anti-diabetics.” Exemplification of a species could be illustrative of members of the class. For processes, the type of reaction, reagents and process conditions should be stated, generally illustrated by a single example unless variations are necessary. Claim Objections Claim 1 is objected to because of the following informalities: there should be an . Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claim 45 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. The scope of claim 45 is indefinite because it depends from claims 1-42, however, the scope of the structures is indefinite because several of these claims have been canceled. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1, 12, 15, 17. 18, 20, 22, 26, 29, 31, 33, 35 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by STN (STN, REGISTRY CAS 2733726-86-6, 17 Nov 2021). The reference STN REGISTRY CAS 2733726-86-6 teaches the following compound, wherein Xh*=O, Z2=CH2, Xh=CH2, Xg=CH, n**=0, Rd=H, Rd*=CH3, L2=C(O), Ring A =5-membered heteroarylene, R*= H, n*=1, L1= C(Rc)(Rc*) and one of Re or Re* and R * taken together with the atoms to which they are bonded form an optionally substituted 3- to 6-membered ring fused to Ring A, B=5-membered heteroaryl, B=6-memembered aryl, R=H, n=1. PNG media_image1.png 261 365 media_image1.png Greyscale This anticipates claims 1, 12, 15, 17. 18, 20, 22, 26, 29, 31, 33, 35. Claim(s) 1, 3, 11-12, 15, 18, 20, 22, 24, 26, 29, 31, 45 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by STN (STN, REGISTRY CAS 1604197-97-8, 13 May 2014). PNG media_image2.png 256 485 media_image2.png Greyscale The reference STN REGISTRY CAS 1604197-97-8 teaches the following compound, wherein Xh*=NH, Z2=CH2, Xh=CH2, Xg=N, n**=0, Re=halo, Rd=H, Rd*=C3 alkyl, L2=C(O), Ring A =5-membered heteroarylene, R*= H, n*=1, L1= CH2, B=6-membered aryl, R=C1 alkoxy, n=1 This anticipates claims 1, 3, 11-12, 15, 18, 20, 22, 24, 26, 29, 31, 45. Claim(s) 1, 7, 17 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by STN (STN, REGISTRY CAS 2212368-15-3, 15 Apr 2018). The reference STN REGISTRY CAS 2212368-15-3 teaches the following compound, wherein Xh*=O, Z2=CH2, Xh=CH2, Xg=CH, n**=0, Rd=H, Rd*=CH3, L2=C(O), Ring A =5-membered heteroarylene, R*= H, n*=1, L1= CH2, B=5-membered heteroaryl, R=C0 alkyl aryl, n=1. PNG media_image3.png 397 519 media_image3.png Greyscale This anticipates claims 1 , 7, 17. Claim(s) 1, 3, 7, 8, 9, 11, 12, 15, 17, 18, 20, 22, 24, 26, 29, 45, 106, 107, 108, 109-112 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by SHEN (SHEN et al., WO 2025130765 A1, effective filing date 2023-12-18). The reference Shen teaches the following compound(page 119), wherein Xh*=(CRe)2, Re=F, Z2= PNG media_image4.png 174 239 media_image4.png Greyscale , Xj=CH, Xe=NH, Xf=C=O, n^=0, Xh=CH2, Xg=N, n**=0, Re=halo, Rd=H, Rd*=C1 alkyl, L2=C(O), Ring A =5-membered heteroarylene, R*= H, n*=1, L1= O, B=6-membered aryl, R=halo, n=1 PNG media_image5.png 114 659 media_image5.png Greyscale PNG media_image6.png 105 581 media_image6.png Greyscale PNG media_image7.png 144 707 media_image7.png Greyscale This anticipates claims 1, 3, 7, 8, 9, 11, 12, 15, 17, 18, 20, 22, 24, 26, 29, 45. The reference also teaches “Pharmaceutical composition: As used herein, the term “pharmaceutical composition” refers to an active agent, formulated together with one or more pharmaceutically acceptable carriers. In some embodiments, an active agent is present in unit dose amount appropriate for administration in a therapeutic regimen that shows a statistically significant probability of achieving a predetermined therapeutic effect when administered to a relevant population. In some embodiments, pharmaceutical compositions may be specially formulated for administration in solid or liquid form, including those adapted for the following: oral administration, for example, drenches (aqueous or non-aqueous solutions or suspensions) , tablets, e.g., those targeted for buccal, sublingual, and systemic absorption, boluses, powders, granules, pastes for application to the tongue; parenteral administration, for example, by subcutaneous, intramuscular, intravenous or epidural injection as, for example, a sterile solution or suspension, or sustained-release formulation; topical application, for example, as a cream, ointment, or a controlled-release patch or spray applied to the skin, lungs, or oral cavity; intravaginally or intrarectally, for example, as a pessary, cream, or foam; sublingually; ocularly; transdermally; or nasally, pulmonary, and to other mucosal surfaces. Pharmaceutically acceptable: As used herein, the phrase “pharmaceutically acceptable” refers to those compounds, materials, compositions and/or dosage forms which are, within the scope of sound medical judgment, suitable for use in contact with the tissues of human beings and animals without excessive toxicity, irritation, allergic response, or other problem or complication, commensurate with a reasonable benefit/risk ratio. Pharmaceutically acceptable carrier: As used herein, the term “pharmaceutically acceptable carrier” means a pharmaceutically-acceptable material, composition or vehicle, such as a liquid or solid filler, diluent, excipient, or solvent encapsulating material, involved in carrying or transporting the subject compound from one organ, or portion of the body, to another organ, or portion of the body” (page 11). This anticipates claim 106. The reference also teaches (page 188): PNG media_image8.png 278 538 media_image8.png Greyscale This anticipates claims 107, 109-112. The reference also teaches “Activation of MRGPRX2 by basic secretagogues, neurokinin peptides, host defense peptides, and small molecules has been reported to lead to mast cell degranulation via an IgE-independent pathway”(page 1). This anticipates claim 108. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 99-100 and 102-103 are allowed. Claims 37-40, 42, 82, 87, 91, 96, 98 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion Claims 1, 3, 7, 8, 9, 11, 12, 15, 17, 18, 20, 22, 24, 26, 29, 31, 33, 35, 45, 106, 107, 108, 109-112 are rejected. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ALISON AZAR HASTINGS whose telephone number is (703)756-4584. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Thurs 7:30am-5pm EST Friday 7:30-4pm EST (every other Friday off). Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Kortney Klinkel can be reached at (571) 270-5239. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /A.A.H./ Examiner, Art Unit 1627 /Kortney L. Klinkel/ Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 1627
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 18, 2024
Application Filed
Aug 27, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12728135
CANNABINOID CONCENTRATE AND ISOLATE, METHOD OF OBTAINING THE SAME AND USE THEREOF
4y 6m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12715894
TRIPTOLIDE CONJUGATES AND USES THEREOF
3y 6m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Patent 12692273
p53 MODULATORS AND USES THEREOF
4y 3m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12661357
USE OF PYRIDO[1,2-A]PYRIMIDONE ANALOGUE
2y 11m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12636370
Combination Therapy For Treatment Of Cancer
4y 3m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
64%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+39.4%)
3y 3m (~1y 3m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 84 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month