Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 01, 2026
Application No. 18/888,585

SURGICAL INSTRUMENTS FOR PHACOEMULSIFICATION SURGERY

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Sep 18, 2024
Examiner
DANG, ANH TIEU
Art Unit
3771
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Johnson & Johnson
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
66%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 3m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 66% — above average
66%
Career Allowance Rate
432 granted / 660 resolved
-4.5% vs TC avg
Strong +36% interview lift
Without
With
+35.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 4m
Avg Prosecution
37 currently pending
Career history
689
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.9%
-38.1% vs TC avg
§103
44.6%
+4.6% vs TC avg
§102
24.6%
-15.4% vs TC avg
§112
21.9%
-18.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 660 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of Group I, Species C (claims 1-13, figures 4-5B) in the reply filed on May 20, 2026 is acknowledged. Claims 14-20 are withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b) as being drawn to a nonelected invention, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Election was made without traverse in the reply filed on May 20, 2026. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-13 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Walter (US20130231605). Regarding claim 1, Walter discloses a surgical instrument for phacoemulsification procedures comprising: a handpiece assembly (100h); and a cleaning member (10) coupled with the handpiece assembly, the cleaning member configured to be inserted into an anterior chamber of an eye of a patient and into a capsular bag of the eye (figure 4), wherein the cleaning member includes one or more polishing elements (10t) configured to detach material from the capsular bag. Regarding claim 2, Walter discloses all of the limitations set forth in claim 1, wherein the one or more polishing elements (10t) include one or more wiping edges (26, figure 1) configured for wiping a surface of the capsular bag, one or more polishing surfaces configured for polishing the capsular bag, or a combination thereof (paragraph 0064). Regarding claim 3, Walter discloses all of the limitations set forth in claim 1, wherein the handpiece assembly includes a handpiece portion (hub) removably attached to a grip portion (paragraph 0021). Regarding claim 4, Walter discloses all of the limitations set forth in claim 1, wherein the handpiece assembly comprises a shaft (12), and wherein the shaft is coupled with the cleaning member (figures 4-6). Regarding claim 5, Walter discloses all of the limitations set forth in claim 1, wherein the cleaning member has a curvilinear or arc shape (tip is round and shaft is cylindrical figures 4-6). Regarding claim 6, Walter discloses all of the limitations set forth in claim 2, further comprising a groove (dimples, paragraph 0079) disposed between a first wiping edge and a second wiping edge of the one or more wiping edges (figures 10D). Regarding claim 7, Walter discloses all of the limitations set forth in claim 2, wherein at least of the one or one or more polishing surfaces is substantially smooth for polishing the capsular bag (paragraph 0064). Regarding claim 8, Walter discloses all of the limitations set forth in claim 2, wherein the one or more polishing surfaces includes a textured material or brush configured to detach material from surfaces of the capsular bag (textured material, paragraph 0079, 0064). Regarding claim 9, Walter discloses all of the limitations set forth in claim 2, wherein the one or more polishing surfaces includes a generally rounded portion having sufficient surface area configured for polishing the capsular bag (figures 4-6). Regarding claim 10, Walter discloses all of the limitations set forth in claim 2, wherein the one or more polishing surfaces includes a first polishing surface configured for polishing the capsular bag and a second polishing surface for polishing the capsular bag (figure 13B, paragraph 0081). Regarding claim 11, Walter discloses all of the limitations set forth in claim 10, further comprising a groove (dimples, paragraph 0079) disposed between the first polishing surface and the second polishing surface. Regarding claim 12, Walter discloses all of the limitations set forth in claim 210, wherein the first polishing surface and the second polishing surface form a V-shaped pattern (paragraph 0081). Regarding claim 13, Walter discloses all of the limitations set forth in claim 21, wherein the cleaning member is fabricated from a soft material (paragraph 0068). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ANH TIEU DANG whose telephone number is (571)270-3221. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Thursday (9am-4pm EST). Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Darwin Erezo can be reached at (571) 272-4695. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ANH T DANG/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3771
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 18, 2024
Application Filed
Jun 25, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12741125
Devices and Methods for Insertion and/or Pressurization of a Balloon Catheter for Balloon Dilation of the Eustachian Tube and Other Anatomical Passageways Accessible Through the Nostril of a Human
1y 9m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12734034
PERCUTANEOUS HEART VALVE DELIVERY SYSTEMS
4y 3m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12734375
SHIELDING FEATURES FOR ULTRASONIC BLADE OF A SURGICAL INSTRUMENT
2y 12m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12721790
DEVICES AND METHODS FOR A HYPER REALISTIC BREAST SHAPED SOOTHER
3y 4m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12721643
SNARE DEVICE
2y 2m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
66%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+35.5%)
3y 4m (~1y 3m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 660 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month