Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/889,081

APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR GENERATING CLOCK TO INCREASE POWER EFFICIENCY

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Sep 18, 2024
Examiner
YOUSSEF, MENATOALLAH M
Art Unit
2849
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
76%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 7m
To Grant
96%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 76% — above average
76%
Career Allow Rate
155 granted / 203 resolved
+8.4% vs TC avg
Strong +20% interview lift
Without
With
+19.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
13 currently pending
Career history
216
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
12.2%
-27.8% vs TC avg
§103
40.6%
+0.6% vs TC avg
§102
19.4%
-20.6% vs TC avg
§112
22.2%
-17.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 203 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1, 5, and 11 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Lee et al. (US 9,083,360 B2). Regarding Claim 1 and equivalent method Claim 11, Lee et al. teaches in Figure 1 an apparatus for generating a clock, the apparatus comprising: a phase locked loop circuit configured to generate, through an oscillator, a first clock signal having a specified frequency (100); a monitoring circuit configured to monitor a first bit error rate of a first signal received based on the first clock signal, thereby generating a monitoring result (300, as further depicted in Figure 3A including 311); and a control logic circuit configured to control the phase locked loop circuit based on the monitoring result (300, as further depicted in Figure 3A 312-316), wherein the control logic circuit is configured to: based on the first bit error rate being equal to or greater than a threshold value, connect a first boosting current source with the, wherein the first boosting current source is included in the phase locked loop circuit oscillator (based in part on 312’s output to control VCO, as further depicted in Figure 10; Figure 10(c): where the current sources, including a first boosting current source, are connected based on control signals Sv1-Svn), and based on the first bit error rate being less than the threshold value, disconnect a second boosting current source from the oscillator, wherein the second boosting current source is previously connected with the oscillator (based in part on 312’s output to control VCO, as further depicted in Figure 10; Figure 10(c): where the current sources, including a second boosting current source, are connected based on control signals Sv1-Svn). Regarding Claim 5, Lee et al. further teaches the apparatus, wherein the phase locked loop circuit includes: a phase detector configured to output a phase difference between the first clock signal and a reference signal (120), and a loop filter configured to control the oscillator based on the phase difference (140, which is based on the output of 120 through CP 130), and wherein the control logic circuit is configured to control a gain of the loop filter such that the first bit error rate decreases based on the phase difference (as controlled by signal CS_LF). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 16-20 are allowed. The following is an examiner’s statement of reasons for allowance: Regarding Claim 16, the prior art does not disclose, teach or suggest an apparatus for generating a clock, the apparatus comprising: wherein the inductor-capacitor oscillator includes: a plurality of cells, each cell of the plurality of cells including a plurality of transistors, the plurality of cells being connected with each other in parallel, and wherein the control logic circuit is configured to, based on the first bit error rate being equal to or greater than a threshold value, connect a first cell from the plurality of cells with the inductor-capacitor tank; in combination with all the other claimed limitations. Claims 17-20 are allowed for depending from Claim 16. Any comments considered necessary by applicant must be submitted no later than the payment of the issue fee and, to avoid processing delays, should preferably accompany the issue fee. Such submissions should be clearly labeled “Comments on Statement of Reasons for Allowance.” Claims 2-4, 6-10 and 12-15 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: Regarding Claim 2, the prior art does not disclose, teach or suggest the apparatus, wherein the phase locked loop circuit includes: a plurality of capacitors corresponding to the plurality of boosting current sources, and wherein the control logic circuit is configured to: based on the first boosting current source being connected with the oscillator, connect a first capacitor corresponding to the first boosting current source with an output node of the oscillator; in combination with all the other claimed limitations. Claims 3, 4, and 6-9 are objected to for depending from Claim 2. Regarding Claim 10, the prior art does not disclose, teach or suggest the apparatus, comprising: a decoder including a look-up table, the look-up table containing a bit error rate of a signal and a control signal corresponding to the bit error rate, the signal being received in a clock signal, and wherein the control logic circuit is configured to transmit a control signal to the phase locked loop circuit based on the look-up table, and the control signal corresponds to a bit error rate of the first signal received from the monitoring circuit; in combination with all the other claimed limitations. Regarding Claim 12, the prior art does not disclose, teach or suggest the method, wherein the phase locked loop circuit includes a plurality of capacitors corresponding to a plurality of boosting current sources, the plurality of boosting current sources including the first boosting current source and the second boosting current source, and wherein the method includes: based on the first boosting current source being connected to the oscillator, connecting a first capacitor among the plurality of capacitors with an output node of the oscillator, wherein the first capacitor corresponds to the first boosting current source; in combination with all the other claimed limitations. Claims 13-15 are objected to for depending from Claim 12. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Higashi et al. (US 2008/0252387 B2) teaches oscillator configurations, including LC-VCOs (see Figures 12A and 12B). Contact Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Diana J Cheng whose telephone number is (571)270-1197. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday 9 am - 5:30 pm ET. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Menatoallah Youssef can be reached at (571)270-3684. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /DIANA J. CHENG/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2849
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 18, 2024
Application Filed
Jan 09, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102
Feb 24, 2026
Interview Requested
Mar 04, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
Mar 04, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 11757355
DATA RECOVERY CIRCUIT INCLUDING CHARGE PUMP HAVING REDUCED GLITC CURRENT
2y 5m to grant Granted Sep 12, 2023
Patent 11244191
REGION PROPOSAL FOR IMAGE REGIONS THAT INCLUDE OBJECTS OF INTEREST USING FEATURE MAPS FROM MULTIPLE LAYERS OF A CONVOLUTIONAL NEURAL NETWORK MODEL
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 08, 2022
Patent 11232353
INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS AND INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD TO GENERATE IMAGE PROCESSING ALGORITHM BASED ON MACHINE LEARNING PROCESS
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 25, 2022
Patent 11176477
SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR UNSUPERVISED DOMAIN ADAPTATION VIA SLICED-WASSERSTEIN DISTANCE
2y 5m to grant Granted Nov 16, 2021
Patent 11170520
IMAGE PROCESSING APPARATUS FOR ANALYZING AN IMAGE TO DETECT AN OBJECT WITHIN THE IMAGE
2y 5m to grant Granted Nov 09, 2021
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
76%
Grant Probability
96%
With Interview (+19.5%)
2y 7m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 203 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month