Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026
Application No. 18/889,155

CONTAINER HAVING UPPER RIM WITH IMPROVED SEAL

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Sep 18, 2024
Priority
Sep 20, 2023 — provisional 63/584,121
Examiner
DEMEREE, CHRISTOPHER R
Art Unit
3734
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Huhtamaki Oyj
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
69%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
5m
Est. Remaining
83%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 69% — above average
69%
Career Allowance Rate
1134 granted / 1646 resolved
-1.1% vs TC avg
Moderate +14% lift
Without
With
+14.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
67 currently pending
Career history
1709
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
43.7%
+3.7% vs TC avg
§102
31.6%
-8.4% vs TC avg
§112
16.7%
-23.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1646 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-5, 7-8, 13-14, and 17-19 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Bantleon (US 4934591 A). Regarding claims 1, 3-4, 8, and 13-14, Bantleon discloses a cardboard container comprising a cylindrically wound jacket with end closures comprising a sidewall construct comprising a perimeter sidewall and an overlapping seam extending the height of the sidewall construct, wherein the overlapping seam comprises a first overlapping portion (12) and a second overlapping portion (12A; Examiner also notes that an associated first and second “rim portion” is located at upper ends of these seams); an upper rim formed into an upper end of the sidewall construct and extending outwardly from the perimeter sidewall (7b; see Fig. 6), the upper rim including at least a portion of the overlapping seam; and a bonding tape (13) located on the first overlapping portion; wherein an upper end of the first overlapping portion includes a corner cut (17); and wherein the bonding tape extends into a cutout region defined by the corner cut (see Fig. 3 and Col 3 lines 15-40). Regarding claims 2 and 7, Bantleon discloses a container wherein the bonding tape comprises a first tape portion located on an inner surface of the first overlapping portion and a second tape portion located on an exterior surface of the first overlapping portion (see Fig. 2). Regarding claims 5 and 17-19, Bantleon discloses a container wherein the upper rim includes a top rim portion extending from the perimeter sidewall, a lower rim portion positioned below the top rim portion, and an intermediate rim portion positioned between the top rim portion and the lower rim portion (see Fig. 6; Examiner considers the intermediate portion to be the outermost portion of the rim comprising the foldover). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 9-12 and 15 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Bantleon in view of Iyori et al. (US 2012/0125926 A1; hereinafter Iyori). Regarding claims 9-12 and 15, Bantleon discloses the claimed invention except for a triangular shaped corner cut with associated shape of tape covering. Iyori teaches a retort cup wherein a bonding tape includes a triangular tape portion located in a cutout region defined by a corner cut (31/32; see Par. 0148-0151), and wherein the cutout region is located directly above at least a portion of a second rim portion (see Fig. 1). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of Applicant’s filing to modify Bantleon’s container to have triangular shaped corner cuts in order to ensure that the entire rim circumference is flat, as taught by Iyori. Examiner further notes that the tape portion that extends over said triangular shaped corner cut would be necessarily also be triangular in shape. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 6, 16, and 20 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. See PTO-892. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to CHRISTOPHER R DEMEREE whose telephone number is (571)270-1982. The examiner can normally be reached 9:00 am - 5:00 pm, Monday through Friday. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, NATHAN J NEWHOUSE can be reached at (571)272-4544. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /CHRISTOPHER R DEMEREE/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3734
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 18, 2024
Application Filed
Sep 22, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12747088
BOX DEFINING WALLS WITH INSULATION CAVITIES
1y 3m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12741782
COLLAPSIBLE TRAY AND METHODS THEREFOR
1y 5m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12741780
TELESCOPING INSULATED BOXES
1y 0m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12735232
DISPENSING VALVE
1y 11m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12729038
CONTAINER FOR FOODSTUFFS AND MANUFACTURING METHOD
2y 4m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
69%
Grant Probability
83%
With Interview (+14.1%)
2y 6m (~5m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1646 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month