Prosecution Insights
Last updated: September 17, 2026
Application No. 18/890,162

EMERGENCY RESPONSE SYSTEM

Non-Final OA §103§112
Filed
Sep 19, 2024
Priority
Apr 06, 2018 — provisional 62/653,856 +2 more
Examiner
MANOHARAN, MUTHUSWAMY GANAPATHY
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Mossmith Industries Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
65%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 7m
Est. Remaining
81%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 65% — above average
65%
Career Allowance Rate
416 granted / 636 resolved
+5.4% vs TC avg
Strong +16% interview lift
Without
With
+15.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 7m
Avg Prosecution
40 currently pending
Career history
688
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.1%
-37.9% vs TC avg
§103
68.4%
+28.4% vs TC avg
§102
18.5%
-21.5% vs TC avg
§112
5.7%
-34.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 636 resolved cases

Office Action

§103 §112
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Regarding claims 3-13, 15-17, 19-21, the base claim 1, has been canceled, a claim which depends thereon should be rejected as indefinite. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 2, 14, 18 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Sullivan et al. (hereinafter Sullivan)(US 2016/0135706) in view of Movsisyan et al. (hereinafter Movsisyan)(US 20083590). Regarding claim 2, Sullivan teaches an emergency response system(P[0274], emergency medical response system), comprising (Fig. 5):one or more hardware processors configured to: receive information relating to a real-time event from one or more computing devices(item 702 in Fig. 7; also P[0305]); implement one or more machine learning algorithms to determine an emergency medical services (EMS) code for the real-time event from a plurality of predefined EMS codes, said one or more machine learning algorithms comprising natural language processing configured to extract details of the real-time event from the information(item 704 in Fig. 7; risk score for multiple event periods; P[0306]; also P[0233], providing risk information to the first responder or medical professional; abstract, machine learning classifier models providing at least the first and second risk scores); identify an emergency responder from a plurality of emergency responders to respond to the real-time event with the one or more machine learning algorithms; cause dispatch of the emergency responder to respond to the real-time event based on the EMS code(P[0506], Patient data may be streamed in real time; P[0333], ECG data in substantially real time for analysis; P[0274], provide indication of the appropriate treatment or intervention to a responder; P[0285-0287], to a first responder); Sullivan did not teach specifically receive, from the one or more computing devices, a status of the real-time event and a status of a subject of the real-time event, and identify a second emergency responder of the plurality of emergency responders to respond to the real-time event based at least in part on the status of the real-time event and the status of the subject of the real-time event. However, Movsisyan teaches in an analogous art receive, from the one or more computing devices, a status of the real-time event and a status of a subject of the real-time event, and identify a second emergency responder of the plurality of emergency responders to respond to the real-time event based at least in part on the status of the real-time event and the status of the subject of the real-time event(col. 11, lines 20-45; plurality of alert messages for which the second responder made qualifying notes; first responder exceeding the quantity threshold). Therefore, it would be obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of invention to use the system to receive, from the one or more computing devices, a status of the real-time event and a status of a subject of the real-time event, and identify a second emergency responder of the plurality of emergency responders to respond to the real-time event based at least in part on the status of the real-time event and the status of the subject of the real-time event in order to have improved efficiency. Claims 14, 18 are rejected for the same reason as set forth in claim 2. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MUTHUSWAMY GANAPATHY MANOHARAN whose telephone number is (571)272-5515. The examiner can normally be reached 6:30am-3:00pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Alison T Slater can be reached at 571-270-0375. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /MUTHUSWAMY G MANOHARAN/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2647
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 19, 2024
Application Filed
Aug 24, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12739734
TECHNIQUES FOR SURROUNDING INFORMATION INDICATION
4y 9m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12732940
METHOD FOR DETERMINING POSITIONING REFERENCE SIGNALING CONFIGURATION INFORMATION
2y 11m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12720462
USER EQUIPMENT POWER CONSUMPTION MODELING
5y 1m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Patent 12713348
ADAPTIVE PROCESSING ENVELOPE BASED ON POWER CONSUMPTION
4y 0m to grant Granted Aug 18, 2026
Patent 12706662
ROTATIONAL ALIGNMENT FOR MULTIPLE-INPUT MULTIPLE-OUTPUT DEVICES
4y 1m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
65%
Grant Probability
81%
With Interview (+15.9%)
3y 7m (~1y 7m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 636 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month