Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 16, 2026
Application No. 18/890,990

MASS TRANSFER ASSEMBLIES WITH HEAT SINK AIR CHANNELS

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Sep 20, 2024
Priority
Sep 21, 2023 — provisional 63/584,433
Examiner
HOPKINS, ROBERT A
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Alliance for Energy Innovation, LLC
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
84%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
6m
Est. Remaining
92%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 84% — above average
84%
Career Allowance Rate
1362 granted / 1611 resolved
+24.5% vs TC avg
Moderate +7% lift
Without
With
+7.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 4m
Avg Prosecution
37 currently pending
Career history
1627
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
3.3%
-36.7% vs TC avg
§103
32.5%
-7.5% vs TC avg
§102
32.1%
-7.9% vs TC avg
§112
26.4%
-13.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1611 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. Claims 1 and 4-11 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Betts et al(2024/0369312) taken together with Lee et al(2009/0126913). Betts et al in figure 1D teaches a plate assembly, comprising: a first plate(first plate 100B) comprising: a first side defining a side of a conditioning channel(conditioning channel 104A), the conditioning channel configured to receive a flow of process air(mixed air 191) from a first end of the plate assembly and output a flow of conditioned air(supply air 193) from a second end of the plate assembly; and a second side, opposite the first side, defining a side of an exhaust channel(exhaust channel 154A), the exhaust channel configured to receive at least a portion of the flow of conditioned air(portion of supply air 195), and output a flow of exhaust air. Betts et al is silent as to the exhaust channel configured to receive a flow of heat sink air and at least a portion of the flow of conditioned air. Lee et al in figures 1 and 9 teaches a heat exchanger including alternating plates(12,14), a dry air inlet opening(22) for outside air into a dry air flow passage(16), and a wet air flow opening(26 in figure 9) for a wet air flow path(21), wherein the wet air flow path provides for a flow of heat sink air to pass a side of a plate opposite the dry air flow passage to provide indirect heat exchange with the air in the dry air flow passage(para 0038). It would have been obvious to someone of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to provide the exhaust channel(154A) of Betts et al with a flow of heat sink air so that a flow of heat sink air and the portion 195 of supply air pass through the exhaust channel and output as a flow of exhaust air. With regards to claim 4, Betts et al taken together with Lee et al further teaches wherein the exhaust channel is configured to receive the portion of the flow of conditioned air from the second end of the plate assembly. With regards to claim 5, Betts et al taken together with Lee et al further teaches wherein the exhaust channel is configured to output the flow of exhaust air from the first end of the plate assembly. With regards to claim 6, Betts et al taken together with Lee et al further teaches wherein the flow of process air is opposite the flow of exhaust air at the first end of the plate assembly. With regards to claim 7, Betts et al taken together with Lee et al further teaches wherein the exhaust channel is configured to receive the flow of heat sink air from the second end of the plate assembly(noting figure 9 of Lee et al). With regards to claim 8, Betts et al taken together with Lee et al further teaches wherein the conditioning channel is configured to receive the flow of process air from at least a half of the first side of the first plate. With regards to claim 9, Betts et al taken together with Lee et al further teaches wherein the exhaust channel is configured to output the flow of exhaust air from at most a half of the second side of the first plate. With regards to claim 10, Betts et al taken together with Lee et al further teaches wherein the first side of the first plate is configured to receive desiccant to dehumidify the flow of process air(para 0040 stating “wicking media , such as wicking media 110, may be positioned along the plurality of conditioning channels 104 and may include liquid desiccant that dehumidifies the mixed air 191”). With regards to claim 11, Betts et al taken together with Lee et al further teaches wherein the conditioning channel is configured to receive the flow of process air from an outside air inlet. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 2,3 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Claim 2 recites “wherein the exhaust channel is configured to receive the flow of heat sink air from the first end of the plate assembly.”. Betts et al taken together with Lee et al teaches an exhaust channel configured to receive the flow of heat sink air, however Betts et al taken together with Lee et al does not teach or suggest wherein the exhaust channel is configured to receive the flow of heat sink air from the first end of the plate assembly. Claim 3 recites “wherein the flow of heat sink air includes at least a portion of the flow of process air.”. Betts et al taken together with Lee et al teaches a flow of heat sink air, however Betts et al taken together with Lee et al does not teach or suggest wherein the flow of heat sink air includes at least a portion of the flow of process air. Claims 12-22 are allowed. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: Claim 12 recites “An apparatus comprising: a first plate assembly comprising a first plate, the first plate comprising: a first side defining a side of a first conditioning channel, the first conditioning channel configured to receive a first flow of process air from a first end of the first plate assembly, and output a first flow of conditioned air from a second end of the first plate assembly, wherein the first plate assembly is configured to output a first portion of the first flow of conditioned air as supply air to a building; and a second side, opposite the first side, defining a side of a first exhaust channel, the first exhaust channel configured to receive a first flow of heat sink air and at least a second portion of the flow of conditioned air, and output a first flow of exhaust air; and a second plate assembly comprising a second plate, the second plate comprising: a first side defining a side of a second conditioning channel, the second conditioning channel configured to receive a second flow of process air and output a second flow of conditioned air; and a second side, opposite the first side, defining a side of a second exhaust channel.”. Betts et al in figure 1D teaches a plate assembly, comprising: a first plate(first plate 100A) comprising: a first side defining a side of a conditioning channel(conditioning channel 104A), the conditioning channel configured to receive a flow of process air(mixed air 191) from a first end of the plate assembly and output a flow of conditioned air(supply air 193) from a second end of the plate assembly; and a second side, opposite the first side, defining a side of an exhaust channel(exhaust channel 154A), the exhaust channel configured to receive at least a portion of the flow of conditioned air(portion of supply air 195), and output a flow of exhaust air. Betts et al is silent as to the exhaust channel configured to receive a flow of heat sink air and at least a portion of the flow of conditioned air. Lee et al in figures 1 and 9 teaches a heat exchanger including alternating plates(12,14), a dry air inlet opening(22) for outside air into a dry air flow passage(16), and a wet air flow opening(26 in figure 9) for a wet air flow path(21), wherein the wet air flow path provides for a flow of heat sink air to pass a side of a plate opposite the dry air flow passage to provide indirect heat exchange with the air in the dry air flow passage(para 0038). It would have been obvious to someone of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to provide the exhaust channel(154A) of Betts et al with a flow of heat sink air so that a flow of heat sink air and the portion 195 of supply air pass through the exhaust channel and output as a flow of exhaust air. However Betts et al taken together with Lee et al does not teach or suggest a second plate assembly comprising a second plate, the second plate comprising: a first side defining a side of a second conditioning channel, the second conditioning channel configured to receive a second flow of process air and output a second flow of conditioned air; and a second side, opposite the first side, defining a side of a second exhaust channel. Claims 13-22 depend on claim 12 and hence are also allowed. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ROBERT A HOPKINS whose telephone number is (571)272-1159. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Thurs 6am-4pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jennifer Dieterle can be reached at 5712707872. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ROBERT A HOPKINS/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1776 July 30, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 20, 2024
Application Filed
Aug 04, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12703123
DEVICE FOR DEGASSING OF A TWO-COMPONENT MULTIPHASE POLYMER-MONOMER MATERIAL AND USE THEREOF IN A DEGASSING EXTRUDER
3y 3m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12704275
HUMIDIFIER
2y 8m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12704276
HUMIDIFIER
2y 8m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12697573
MIST COLLECTOR AND MACHINE TOOL
2y 8m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12697626
ROTOR OF GAS DISPERSION ARRANGEMENT
2y 8m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
84%
Grant Probability
92%
With Interview (+7.4%)
2y 4m (~6m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1611 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month