Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/891,146

METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR DETERMINING THE CONTENT OF AT LEAST ONE IMPURITY IN A CRYOGENIC LIQUID

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Sep 20, 2024
Priority
Sep 21, 2023 — FR FR 2309983
Examiner
SINHA, TARUN
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
L'Air Liquide, Société Anonyme pour l'Etude et l'Exploitation des Procédés Georges Claude
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
77%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
10m
Est. Remaining
94%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 77% — above average
77%
Career Allowance Rate
461 granted / 601 resolved
+16.7% vs TC avg
Strong +18% interview lift
Without
With
+17.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 8m
Avg Prosecution
19 currently pending
Career history
616
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.8%
-38.2% vs TC avg
§103
89.5%
+49.5% vs TC avg
§102
2.0%
-38.0% vs TC avg
§112
3.9%
-36.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 601 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statements (IDS) submitted were filed in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner. Claim Objections Claim 9 is objected to because of the following informalities: Line 6 teaches “the vaporization means”. This term lacks antecedent basis and should be “a vaporization means”. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 9 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Patrick FR 3066596 (as seen in the IDS). As to claim 9, Patrick teaches “An apparatus configured to determine a content of at least one impurity dissolved in a cryogenic liquid (page 1 teaches “The present invention relates to a method for analysing trace contaminants in a cryogenic liquid, i.e. a liquid which is liquefied at a cryogenic temperature.”), the at least one impurity being less volatile than the cryogenic liquid, the apparatus comprising: a vessel configured to receive an initial volume of the cryogenic liquid (Figure 1, E); means for isolating the vessel against any exit of material once all of the cryogenic liquid has been vaporized by the vaporization means (Figure 1 possesses valves V1-V7 that can isolate the vessel; Figure 1, H is a heating element; Page 3 teaches “The liquid L is heated by a heat source H and is partially vaporized, leaving a quantity of residual liquid R. A heat exchanger supplied by an external heat source 15 (heat exchange with a heat-generating fluid, electricity, waves, etc.) partially vaporizes the liquid.”); means for sending, into the vessel isolated by the isolation means, a determinable volume of gas, and means for vaporization or sublimation of the solid or liquid phase of the at least one impurity in such a way as to load the gas present in the vessel with the impurity, by heating the gas present in the vessel (Figure 1, pipes 1, 3, 5, 7, 9 aid in sending a gas/liquid to the vessel and out of the vessel); and a gas analyser in fluid communication with the vessel, wherein the gas analyser is configured to receive the gas loaded with the at least one impurity from the vessel, wherein the gas analyser is further configured to determine the content of the at least one impurity in the cryogenic liquid from a content of the at least one impurity measured in the gas loaded with the impurity (Page 2 teaches “The contaminant content of the residual liquid is measured by completely vaporizing 15 the residual liquid with at least one contaminant that it contains, the vaporization enclosure then being isolated from any material inlet or outlet and then the contaminant content in the vaporized residual liquid is analyzed and 20 d) The contaminant content in the initial liquid is deduced from the measurement of contaminant in the residual liquid. According to other optional aspects: during step ii), the liquid is completely vaporized, thus creating an increase in pressure in the isolated and closed chamber and 25 the vapor generated is then sent to an analyzer, the vapor generated is heated to a temperature higher than the vaporization temperature of the contaminant at the pressure of the chamber before sending it to the analyzer, the analyzer is capable of measuring a concentration of a 30 contaminant of less than 10 ppm, or even 1 ppm, or even 0.1 ppm.”).” Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-8 are allowed. The prior arts do not teach “vaporizing, within the vessel, all the cryogenic liquid present in the vessel, the pressure in the vessel during vaporization being lower than or equal to the pressure in the vessel during the filling step” and “and determining the content of the impurity in the cryogenic liquid from a content of the impurity measured, by the gas analyser, in the gas loaded with the impurity.” Claims 10 and 11 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. These depend from claim 9, and the prior arts do not teach the particulars of claim 10 and do not teach “a thermosiphon effect” as seen in claim 11. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to TARUN SINHA whose telephone number is (571)270-3993. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday, 10AM-6PM EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Laura Martin can be reached at (571) 272-2160. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /TARUN SINHA/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2855
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 20, 2024
Application Filed
Jun 26, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12681037
ACOUSTIC WIND MEASUREMENT
2y 6m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12680980
ADAPTABLE APPARATUS FOR NON-DESTRUCTIVE INSPECTION
2y 11m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12663343
SCANNING DEVICE FOR AN AIR FILTER
2y 7m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12663452
UNIDENTIFIED AERIAL PHENOMENA FIELD DISTURBANCE DETECTOR
2y 5m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12656320
UT Sensor Interface for Scanning Complex Environments
3y 0m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
77%
Grant Probability
94%
With Interview (+17.8%)
2y 8m (~10m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 601 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month