Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/892,691

Abnormality Determination Device and Abnormality Determination Method

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Sep 23, 2024
Examiner
DO, TRUC M
Art Unit
3658
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
82%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 12m
To Grant
90%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 82% — above average
82%
Career Allow Rate
544 granted / 660 resolved
+30.4% vs TC avg
Moderate +7% lift
Without
With
+7.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 12m
Avg Prosecution
37 currently pending
Career history
697
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
9.2%
-30.8% vs TC avg
§103
50.6%
+10.6% vs TC avg
§102
22.9%
-17.1% vs TC avg
§112
15.9%
-24.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 660 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . DETAILED ACTION This is a non-final Office Action on the merits in response to communications filed by Applicant on September 23, 2024. Claims 1-10 are currently pending and examined below. Priority Receipt is acknowledged of papers submitted under 35 U.S.C. 119(a)-(d), which papers have been placed of record in the file. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement(s) (IDS) submitted on is/are being considered by the examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-10 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) and/or 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Yoon et al. US2023/0057912 (“Yoon”). Regarding claim(s) 1, 10. Yoon discloses an abnormality determination device comprising (para. 42, the first extraction unit 220 may be configured to determine that the cell 10 is operating abnormally and stop operation of the cell.): a battery pack mounted on a mobile object, and including a sulfide-based all-solid-state battery and a housing in which the sulfide-based all-solid-state battery is housed (para. 13, the present invention provides a system of estimating a state of health of an all-solid-state battery that may include the all-solid-state battery including a plurality of cells and a hydrogen sulfide sensor configured to measure an amount or an increase rate of generated hydrogen sulfide in each cell); a hydrogen sulfide sensor that outputs a signal indicating a concentration of hydrogen sulfide in the battery pack (para. 33, the hydrogen sulfide sensor 50 is a thin film-type gas sensor. A known gas sensor may be used as the hydrogen sulfide sensor 50, and the sensing unit 52 may be a thin film containing zirconium (Zr), tin (Sn) or the like. When the hydrogen sulfide sensor 50 is disposed between the sealing portion 32 of the casing 30,); and a determination unit that determines whether the battery pack has an abnormality, by using an output value of the hydrogen sulfide sensor, wherein the determination unit determines that the battery pack has an abnormality, when the output value is larger than a threshold value (para. 43, para, 64-68), and determines whether the battery pack has an abnormality, by using, as the threshold value, a value that varies depending on a state of the mobile object (para. 64, fter estimation of the state of health through collection of the current-voltage data during charging of the all-solid-state battery and the collection of full-charge capacity data, whether hydrogen sulfide is generated in the all-solid-state battery is detected by the first extraction unit 220 (S202). The generation of hydrogen sulfide may be detected by the hydrogen sulfide sensor 50 provided in each cell 10, and data on the amount of hydrogen sulfide that is generated, measured by the hydrogen sulfide sensor 50, is collected (S204).). Regarding claim(s) 2. Yoon discloses wherein a cooler that cools the battery pack is mounted on the mobile object, while the cooler is in operation, the determination unit determines that the battery pack has an abnormality, when the output value is larger than a first threshold value, while the cooler is not in operation, the determination unit determines that the battery pack has an abnormality, when the output value is larger than a second threshold value, and the second threshold value is larger than the first threshold value (para. 43, The first extraction unit 220 may be configured to extract the amount of hydrogen sulfide generated in real time measured by the hydrogen sulfide sensor 50 and to calculate the rate of increase in the amount of hydrogen sulfide based on the change in the amount of hydrogen sulfide that is generated over time. In addition, when the calculated amount of hydrogen sulfide that is generated exceeds a preset hydrogen sulfide threshold, the first extraction unit 220 may be configured to determine that the cell 10 is operating abnormally and stop operation of the cell.). Regarding claim(s) 3. Yoon discloses wherein the mobile object comprises a vehicle (para. 3, use in a vehicle), while the vehicle is stopped, the determination unit determines that the battery pack has an abnormality, when the output value is larger than a first threshold value, while the vehicle travels, the determination unit determines that the battery pack has an abnormality, when the output value is larger than a second threshold value, and the second threshold value is larger than the first threshold value (para. 65-58, When the amount of hydrogen sulfide that has been generated is less than the hydrogen sulfide threshold, the state-of-health of the all-solid-state battery may be estimated by the state-of-health estimation unit 260 based on the collected data on the generated amount of hydrogen sulfide (S210). As described above, the state of health is estimated by comparing the SOH value as a function of the amount of hydrogen sulfide generated in a certain cell with the value shown in a table prepared in advance.) Regarding claim(s) 4. Yoon discloses wherein when a vehicle stoppage time of the vehicle having elapsed from transition of the vehicle from a system-stopped state to a system-activated state is a predetermined time or less and the output value is larger than the first threshold value, the determination unit determines that the battery pack has an abnormality (para. 47, The state-of-health estimation unit 260 may be configured to estimate the state of health of the all-solid-state battery based on the data collected by the first extraction unit 220 and the second extraction unit 240.). Regarding claim(s) 5. Yoon discloses wherein the abnormality determination device further comprises a notification unit that makes a notification, when the determination unit determines that the battery pack has an abnormality, of occurrence of the abnormality (para. 49, The state-of-health estimation unit 260 may be configured to estimate the state of health through the discharge capacity factor based on the full-charge capacity data extracted from the second extraction unit 240. The discharge capacity factor may be extracted from the result of integrating the current of the cell 10 from full-charge (SoC of 100) to full-discharge (SoC of 0). A look-up table in which state-of-health values of the battery corresponding to the discharge capacity factors are stored may be obtained through experimentation in advance, and this data is stored in the information-processing-and-storing unit 280.). Regarding claim(s) 6. Yoon discloses wherein the mobile object comprises a vehicle, and the determination unit is activated each time a predetermined time has elapsed while the vehicle is in a system-stopped state, and determines that the battery pack has an abnormality when the output value is larger than the threshold value (para. 31, The hydrogen sulfide sensor 50 may include a sensing unit 52 and a signaling unit 54. The sensing unit 52 may be configured to detect the amount of hydrogen sulfide generated in the all-solid-state battery cell 10, and the signaling unit 54 may be configured to transmit information regarding the detected amount of hydrogen sulfide to the outside in real time.). Regarding claim(s) 7. Yoon discloses wherein the abnormality determination device further comprises a communication unit capable of communicating with a terminal, and when the determination unit determines that the battery pack has an abnormality, the communication unit transmits, to the terminal, information that the battery pack has the abnormality (para. 31-36, the signaling unit 54 may be configured to transmit information regarding the detected amount of hydrogen sulfide to the outside in real time.). Regarding claim(s) 8. Yoon discloses wherein the battery pack is capable of undergoing external charging by an external power supply external to the vehicle, and the determination unit determines whether the battery pack has an abnormality, while the external charging of the battery pack is performed (para. 45-46, The second extraction unit 240 may also be configured to extract factors for estimating the state of health of the all-solid-state battery, and in particular, to extract factors based on the electrochemical reaction. More specifically, the second extraction unit 240 may be configured to collect current-voltage data during charging of the battery and to collect full-charge capacity data of the all-solid-state battery.). Regarding claim(s) 9. Yoon discloses wherein the abnormality determination device further comprises: a communication unit capable of communicating with a terminal; and a notification unit, and when the determination unit determines that the battery pack has an abnormality, the determination unit makes a notification that the battery pack has the abnormality, by using the notification unit, and transmits, to the terminal, information that the battery pack has the abnormality, by using the communication unit (para. 50, [0050] The state-of-health estimation unit 260 may be configured to estimate the state of health of the battery through the current-voltage data during charging, extracted from the second extraction unit 240. The second extraction unit 240 may be configured to extract the internal resistance of the cell 10 based on the current-voltage data during charging. Using Ohm's law, the internal resistance is calculated from a voltage change signal as a function of a certain current value. Estimation of the state of health of the battery is based on the fact that as aging of the cell 10 progresses, the internal resistance of the battery increases. In other words, the state-of-health estimation unit 260 contains a comparison reference for each cell specification.). Inquiry Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to TRUC M DO whose telephone number is (571)270-5962. The examiner can normally be reached on 9AM-6PM. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Ramón Mercado, Ph.D. can be reached on (571) 270-5744. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /TRUC M DO/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3658
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 23, 2024
Application Filed
Dec 13, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102
Feb 20, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
Feb 20, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12570273
PARKING ASSISTANCE METHOD AND PARKING ASSISTANCE DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12548440
DISTRIBUTED OPTICAL FIBER SENSING (DFOS) SYSTEM AND METHOD OF USING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 10, 2026
Patent 12546648
DISTRIBUTED OPTICAL FIBER SENSING (DFOS) SYSTEM AND METHOD OF USING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 10, 2026
Patent 12542053
INFORMATION PROVISION SYSTEM, METHOD FOR PROVIDING PASSENGER VEHICLE INFORMATION, AND RECORDED PROGRAM MEDIUM
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 03, 2026
Patent 12534096
METHODS AND SYSTEMS AND NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTERS FOR MONITORING DRIVING BEHAVIOR OF A VEHICLE
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 27, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
82%
Grant Probability
90%
With Interview (+7.2%)
2y 12m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 660 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month