Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/892,869

SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR ATTACHING SOFT TISSUE TO BONE

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Sep 23, 2024
Priority
Jan 30, 2009 — provisional 61/148,805 +5 more
Examiner
SCHERBEL, TODD J
Art Unit
3771
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Conmed Corporation
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
76%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
1y 1m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 76% — above average
76%
Career Allowance Rate
596 granted / 782 resolved
+6.2% vs TC avg
Strong +52% interview lift
Without
With
+52.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 1m
Avg Prosecution
29 currently pending
Career history
805
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.5%
-38.5% vs TC avg
§103
34.7%
-5.3% vs TC avg
§102
28.9%
-11.1% vs TC avg
§112
28.3%
-11.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 782 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application is being examined under the pre-AIA first to invent provisions. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (b) the invention was patented or described in a printed publication in this or a foreign country or in public use or on sale in this country, more than one year prior to the date of application for patent in the United States. Claim(s) 2 is rejected under pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(b) as being anticipated by US 2006/0116719 (Martinek). 2. An anchor (fastener 10) for attaching tissue to bone (FIG. 8), comprising: an anchor body (expandable body 12) comprising an axial bore (aperture 15) and a plurality of bone-engaging tines (legs 18) extending in a proximal direction from the anchor body (e.g., extending in a patient-proximal direction in FIG. 1); a spreader (setting pin 24) comprising a first end base (e.g., left end in FIG. 1) and a second end base (e.g., right end in FIG. 1) wherein the first end base has a larger diameter than the second end base (see diameter of larger diameter of bulbous portion 34 in FIG. 1); and wherein the first end base comprises a first surface (see annotated FIG. 9) that faces an opposite direction (e.g., proximal direction where these surfaces at least partially face these directions in FIG. 9) as a direction faced (e.g., distal direction) by a second surface (see annotated FIG. 9) of the second end base, and wherein the first surface comprises a largest diameter of the spreader (FIG. 9); and wherein the first base end of the spreader is configured to expand the tines outward upon distal movement (e.g., patient-distal movement) of the spreader relative to the anchor body (FIG. 2-3; P0040). PNG media_image1.png 477 454 media_image1.png Greyscale Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments regarding the new limitations with respect to Martinek have been considered but are moot because the arguments do not apply to the rejection in the previous office action (e.g., do not apply to claim limitations previously rejected). All arguments directed to new limitations in the amended claims are addressed in the rejection above. Applicant’s amendment to claim 2, specifically the inclusion of new limitations, necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure: US 8,523,902 (Heaven ‘902) and US 12,096,925 (Heaven ‘925) appear to be eligible for double patenting rejections. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to TODD J SCHERBEL whose telephone number is (571)270-7085. The examiner can normally be reached Mon - Fri 9:00-6:00. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jackie Ho can be reached at 571-272-4696. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. TJ SCHERBEL Primary Examiner Art Unit 3771 /TODD J SCHERBEL/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3771
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 23, 2024
Application Filed
Jan 14, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102
Apr 14, 2026
Response Filed
Apr 28, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102
Jul 29, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Jul 30, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Sep 03, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12746156
OPHTHALMIC KNIFE AND METHODS OF USE
1y 10m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12740801
METHOD OF OPERATING AN ARTICULATING ULTRASONIC SURGICAL INSTRUMENT
3y 11m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12733724
DEPILATOR
1y 9m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12714643
Needle Assemblies
2y 6m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Patent 12702590
ROBOTIC CATARACT SURGERY USING FOCUSED ULTRASOUND
1y 10m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
76%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+52.3%)
3y 1m (~1y 1m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 782 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month