Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/892,941

WEARABLE NEUROSTIMULATION SYSTEM WITH CURATED THERAPY

Non-Final OA §DP
Filed
Sep 23, 2024
Priority
Jul 15, 2020 — provisional 63/052,192 +1 more
Examiner
ALTER MORSCHAUSER, ALYSSA MARGO
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Ebt Medical Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
77%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 6m
Est. Remaining
93%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 77% — above average
77%
Career Allowance Rate
614 granted / 799 resolved
+16.8% vs TC avg
Strong +16% interview lift
Without
With
+15.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 3m
Avg Prosecution
34 currently pending
Career history
846
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.5%
-37.5% vs TC avg
§103
64.5%
+24.5% vs TC avg
§102
14.3%
-25.7% vs TC avg
§112
7.6%
-32.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 799 resolved cases

Office Action

§DP
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Double Patenting The nonstatutory double patenting rejection is based on a judicially created doctrine grounded in public policy (a policy reflected in the statute) so as to prevent the unjustified or improper timewise extension of the “right to exclude” granted by a patent and to prevent possible harassment by multiple assignees. A nonstatutory double patenting rejection is appropriate where the conflicting claims are not identical, but at least one examined application claim is not patentably distinct from the reference claim(s) because the examined application claim is either anticipated by, or would have been obvious over, the reference claim(s). See, e.g., In re Berg, 140 F.3d 1428, 46 USPQ2d 1226 (Fed. Cir. 1998); In re Goodman, 11 F.3d 1046, 29 USPQ2d 2010 (Fed. Cir. 1993); In re Longi, 759 F.2d 887, 225 USPQ 645 (Fed. Cir. 1985); In re Van Ornum, 686 F.2d 937, 214 USPQ 761 (CCPA 1982); In re Vogel, 422 F.2d 438, 164 USPQ 619 (CCPA 1970); In re Thorington, 418 F.2d 528, 163 USPQ 644 (CCPA 1969). A timely filed terminal disclaimer in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(c) or 1.321(d) may be used to overcome an actual or provisional rejection based on nonstatutory double patenting provided the reference application or patent either is shown to be commonly owned with the examined application, or claims an invention made as a result of activities undertaken within the scope of a joint research agreement. See MPEP § 717.02 for applications subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA as explained in MPEP § 2159. See MPEP § 2146 et seq. for applications not subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . A terminal disclaimer must be signed in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(b). The filing of a terminal disclaimer by itself is not a complete reply to a nonstatutory double patenting (NSDP) rejection. A complete reply requires that the terminal disclaimer be accompanied by a reply requesting reconsideration of the prior Office action. Even where the NSDP rejection is provisional the reply must be complete. See MPEP § 804, subsection I.B.1. For a reply to a non-final Office action, see 37 CFR 1.111(a). For a reply to final Office action, see 37 CFR 1.113(c). A request for reconsideration while not provided for in 37 CFR 1.113(c) may be filed after final for consideration. See MPEP §§ 706.07(e) and 714.13. The USPTO Internet website contains terminal disclaimer forms which may be used. Please visit www.uspto.gov/patent/patents-forms. The actual filing date of the application in which the form is filed determines what form (e.g., PTO/SB/25, PTO/SB/26, PTO/AIA /25, or PTO/AIA /26) should be used. A web-based eTerminal Disclaimer may be filled out completely online using web-screens. An eTerminal Disclaimer that meets all requirements is auto-processed and approved immediately upon submission. For more information about eTerminal Disclaimers, refer to www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/applying-online/eterminal-disclaimer. Claims 1-26 are rejected on the ground of nonstatutory double patenting as being unpatentable over claims 1-22 of U.S. Patent No. 12,102,818 B2. Although the claims at issue are not identical, they are not patentably distinct from each other because US 12,102,818 B2 has been found to anticipate each and every element of the present invention, for instance both provide: 18/892941 (claim 1) US 12,102,818 B1 (claim 1) A transcutaneous stimulation system comprising: A transcutaneous stimulation system comprising: a stimulation module having at least one electrical stimulus generator for transmitting electrical signals through a plurality of electrical generator channels; a stimulation module having at least one electrical stimulus generator for transmitting electrical-signals through a plurality of electrical generator channels; a control module electrically coupled to said at least one electrical stimulus generator a control module electrically coupled to said at least one electrical stimulus generator for activating or deactivating each of said electrical generator channels in accordance with a predetermined stimulation protocol having a set of at least two stimulation montages with a weighting value defined for each of a set of activated pads; for activating or deactivating each of said electrical generator channels in accordance with a predetermined stimulation protocol having a set of at least two stimulation montages with a weighting value defined for each of a set of activated pads, a wearable stimulation matrix defining a plurality of pairs of electrical stimulation pads a wearable stimulation matrix defining a plurality of pairs of electrical stimulation pads which are adapted be positioned in a releasably fixed and predefined arrangement on an external surface of a user’s skin to provide improved transcutaneous stimulation of a nerve target in a limb of the user, activated transcutaneously which are adapted to be positioned in a releasably fixed and predefined arrangement on an external surface of a user's skin, each of said pairs of electrical stimulation pads having a cathodic pad and an anodic pad electrically coupled to a respective cathodic and anodic electrical generator channel, each of said pairs of electrical stimulation pads having a cathodic pad and an anodic pad electrically coupled to a respective cathodic and anodic electrical generator channel, each of said electrical stimulation pads being in (1) an active state when a respective electrical generator channel is activated, and (2) an inactive state when a respective electrical generator channel is deactivated; each of said electrical stimulation pads being in (1) an active state having a weighting value when a respective electrical generator channel is activated, and (2) an inactive state when a respective electrical generator channel is deactivated; a first stimulation montage defined for the pads of the stimulation matrix where each of said electrical stimulation pads is in said active state with a selected first weighting value set in accordance with said predetermined stimulation protocol or is in said inactive state; a first stimulation montage defined for the pads of the stimulation matrix where each of said electrical stimulation pads is in said active state with a first weighting value in accordance with said predetermined stimulation protocol or said inactive state; at least a second stimulation montage defined for the pads of the stimulation matrix where at least one of said electrical stimulation pads is in an inactive state or in an active state that has a second weighting value that is different than the first weighting value when said at least one stimulation pad of said electrical stimulation pads is in said active state with the first weighting value in said first stimulation montage; at least a second stimulation montage defined for the pads of the stimulation matrix where at least one of said electrical stimulation pads is in an inactive state or an active state that has a second weighting value that is different than the first weighting value when said at least one stimulation pad is in said active state with the first weighting value in said first stimulation montage; and, a user interface device for permitting user input that is used to cause transitioning of said stimulation matrix from said first stimulation montage to said at least second stimulation montage in accordance with a defined set of montages defined by said predetermined stimulation protocol during a transcutaneous stimulation treatment of the user. and, a user interface device for permitting user input that is used to cause transitioning said stimulation matrix from said first stimulation montage to said at least second stimulation montage in accordance with a defined set of montages defined by said predetermined stimulation protocol during a treatment of the user. As set forth above, the present invention is not viewed to be patentably distinct from US 12,102,818 B2. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ALYSSA M ALTER whose telephone number is (571)272-4939. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 8am-4pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, David E Hamaoui can be reached at (571) 270-5625. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ALYSSA M ALTER/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3796
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 23, 2024
Application Filed
Jun 29, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §DP (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12678106
FATIGUE ESTIMATION DEVICE, FATIGUE ESTIMATION METHOD, AND STORAGE MEDIUM
2y 7m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12673206
SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR ELECTRODE POSITIONING SYSTEM UTILIZING AN ALGORITHM FOR FILTERING ELECTROMYOGRAPHY DATA
4y 2m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12673200
STIMULATION SYSTEMS AND RELATED USER INTERFACES
2y 6m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12667723
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR TREATING AUTISM SPECTRUM DISORDER, DEVELOPMENTAL DISORDERS AND OTHER MEDICAL CONDITIONS
3y 2m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12667294
BIPOLAR NERVE STIMULATION/MONITORING CUFF
1y 1m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
77%
Grant Probability
93%
With Interview (+15.8%)
3y 3m (~1y 6m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 799 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month