Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026
Application No. 18/893,354

SYSTEM FOR ROPING PRACTICE

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Sep 23, 2024
Priority
Sep 25, 2023 — provisional 63/584,976
Examiner
KNUTSON, JACOB D
Art Unit
3611
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Dallon Sagers
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
80%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
5m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 80% — above average
80%
Career Allowance Rate
864 granted / 1084 resolved
+27.7% vs TC avg
Strong +20% interview lift
Without
With
+20.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
24 currently pending
Career history
1111
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.0%
-39.0% vs TC avg
§103
48.0%
+8.0% vs TC avg
§102
21.1%
-18.9% vs TC avg
§112
25.7%
-14.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1084 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim 1 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Hartmann (DE 102014000859) in view of Perkins (US 2006/0170163 A1). For claim 1, Hartmann discloses a system for roping practice, comprising: a vehicle 1 comprising: a controller 6 [configured to control the on/off state of the vehicle based on a status of a switch 5] (pages 15 and 16, paragraph [0023] and pages 16 and 17, paragraph [0024], wherein an on/off state of the vehicle is the on/off state of the electric drive 4 which is part of the vehicle), but does not explicitly disclose a dummy coupled to the vehicle via a hitch device; wherein the hitch device is configured to actuate the switch. Perkins discloses a roping practice device comprising a speed roper including [a vertical post 6; a tow bar 4 is a ring that can be dropped over a ball hitch on a towing vehicle] (page 3, paragraph [0061]); and [a roping dummy] (fig. 6). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to additionally use the roping practice device of Perkins with the vehicle of Hartmann with a reasonable expectation of success because it would allow for an easily mounted roping training device, which is durable and provides natural and adjustable relative movement between the animal body and legs, thus allowing for improving roping skill in urban environments. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 10 – 18 are allowed. Claims 2 – 9 is objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: the prior art fails to disclose: For claims 2 – 9: the hitch device comprises a hitch body and a hitch mechanism, the hitch mechanism configured to slide within the hitch body and actuate the switch; For claims 10: a switch bracket receivable within a hollow shaft and configured to hold the switch; a hitch mechanism comprising a first member slidable within the hollow shaft, a spring extending through an end bracket and the first member, a threaded bolt extending through the end bracket, the spring, the first member, the switch bracket, and a receiving member; or For claims 11 – 18: initiating a drive mechanism of the vehicle and allowing the vehicle to operate without a human operator; lassoing the dummy exerts a rearward force on the dummy; wherein the rearward force on the dummy actuates a switch, the switch configured to cause the vehicle to stop moving. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. US-10413794 – comprising a simulated steer body and shoulder portion; and a frame comprising a frame body portion; a frame head portion; body attachment points; and shoulder attachment point; WO-2016090381 – comprising a head; wheels; an attachment hitch; a steel rope; a sled and a roping release mechanism; US-8720894 – comprising ground preparation apparatus; towable roping machine; and an ATV; US-20130026688 – comprising a dummy; a sled; a tow bar; a dummy hitch; and a moto tang; US-8297980 – comprising a simulated calf; a support column; and a towing structure; and US-5286032 – comprising a trailer assembly; a support assembly; and a steer assembly including a head, upper neck, lower neck, and body. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Jacob D. Knutson whose telephone number is (571)270-5576. The examiner can normally be reached 8:00 am - 4:00 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Valentin Neacsu can be reached at (571)-272-6265. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JACOB D KNUTSON/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3611
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 23, 2024
Application Filed
Oct 15, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12759353
Trailer Hitch Restrictor Assembly
3y 4m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12752614
TIRE COVER FOR WHEELCHAIR
2y 9m to grant Granted Oct 06, 2026
Patent 12746159
CONTROL SYSTEM AND CONTROL METHOD FOR CONTROLLING ELECTRIC WALKING AID DEVICE
3y 5m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12741704
Dynamically Adjustable Gooseneck Ball Mount
2y 7m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12734852
AUTOMATED TRAILER COUPLING ARRANGEMENT
2y 9m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
80%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+20.5%)
2y 6m (~5m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1084 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month