Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 17, 2026
Application No. 18/893,381

Car Seat Attachable Speaker Device

Non-Final OA §102§103§112
Filed
Sep 23, 2024
Examiner
BARFIELD, ANTHONY DERRELL
Art Unit
3636
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
unknown
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
80%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 5m
To Grant
94%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 80% — above average
80%
Career Allow Rate
975 granted / 1218 resolved
+28.0% vs TC avg
Moderate +14% lift
Without
With
+13.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 5m
Avg Prosecution
23 currently pending
Career history
1241
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
38.3%
-1.7% vs TC avg
§102
45.2%
+5.2% vs TC avg
§112
13.1%
-26.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1218 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 9-19 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. The applicant has used double inclusion by claiming the same invention as disclosed in claim 1, which renders the claim indefinite as to whether or not the applicant is intending to claim the same invention in claim 9 as in claim 1. Applicant must clarify. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-19 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Siegel et al (CN 204798856 U). Siegel et al. has disclosed a car seat attachable speaker device (20) comprising a body (22) comprised of a speaker (90), Bluetooth transmitter, a removable battery (via box 80), button (84) that can control the volume of the speaker and a fastener (76,76’,96,100,104). The body is in the form of an object and the body having indicia comprising an image (as shown in Figs. 2B, 2D, 3 and 5). Siegel further has disclosed the fastener may comprise an elastic band (not shown). Regarding claim 10, the speaker may be “angled” with respect to the main body upon the handle (70) protruding upwardly and outwardly from the main body (as shown in Figure 4). Regarding claims 11-12, Siegel has disclosed that the handle may have an insertion hole for charging the battery (therefore the battery is rechargeable and non-removable from the box). Regarding claims 13-16, the fastener may comprise an adjustable-length strap (104) and a secondary fastener, in the form of a hook (76, 96) and a sliding buckle (Fig. 7B). Regarding claims 17-19, Siegel et al. has disclosed the use of light (34) that is repositionable (to and from a night position (NP)) and a removable decorative cover (46). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Siegel at al. Siegel et al. has disclosed all the teachings of the claimed invention. Consequently the method steps as recited would have been incorporated within the use of the invention as taught by Siegel et al. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Reference Nos. 2015/0262465, 2021/0024032, 2023/0083148, CN 109109801 A and BR102013017334 A2 show features of the claimed invention. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ANTHONY D BARFIELD whose telephone number is (571)272-6852. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ANTHONY D BARFIELD/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3636 adb March 8, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 23, 2024
Application Filed
Mar 08, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12600480
VEHICLE PASSENGER SEAT ASSEMBLY
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12594860
VEHICLE SEAT DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12594859
VEHICLE SEAT
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12593921
SEAT SUPPORT
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12593918
CROSS-ELASTIC DIRECTOR'S CHAIR
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
80%
Grant Probability
94%
With Interview (+13.9%)
2y 5m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1218 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in for Full Analysis

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month