Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/894,312

DISCOVERY FRAMES AND GROUP ADDRESSED FRAMES TRANSMISSION

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Sep 24, 2024
Priority
Jan 04, 2019 — provisional 62/788,529 +2 more
Examiner
REDDIVALAM, SRINIVASA R
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Apple Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
80%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 5m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 80% — above average
80%
Career Allowance Rate
449 granted / 563 resolved
+19.8% vs TC avg
Strong +23% interview lift
Without
With
+22.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 3m
Avg Prosecution
14 currently pending
Career history
575
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.6%
-39.4% vs TC avg
§103
95.8%
+55.8% vs TC avg
§102
1.3%
-38.7% vs TC avg
§112
0.7%
-39.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 563 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status 1. The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 2. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. 3. This application currently names joint inventors. In considering patentability of the claims the examiner presumes that the subject matter of the various claims was commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the claimed invention(s) absent any evidence to the contrary. Applicant is advised of the obligation under 37 CFR 1.56 to point out the inventor and effective filing dates of each claim that was not commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the later invention in order for the examiner to consider the applicability of 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(C) for any potential 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) prior art against the later invention. 4. Claims 1, 6-9, 14-16 and 20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Ouchi et al. (US Pub. No: 2020/0221516 A1) in view of Ghosh et al. (US Pub. No: 2019/0373599 A1). Regarding claim 1, Ouchi et al. teach a method performed by a source electronic device (see Abstract and Fig.9, AP 101 for source electronic device), the method comprising: generating, by the source electronic device, a group addressed frame comprising a specific association identifier (AID) for the group addressed frame (see Fig.9 and para [0066] wherein the AP 101 transmitting an NDP report TF 901 frame with the Starting AID=1 & N=18 to a group of electronic devices 102 a to 102q, is mentioned, and also the AP 101 transmitting a basic trigger frame (TF) 903 whose destinations are set to be the STA 102a and the STA 102b, is mentioned and also see paragraphs [0038] & [0053]) and transmitting, by the source electronic device, the group addressed frame to a sink electronic device (see Fig.9 and para [0066] wherein the AP 101 transmitting an NDP report TF 901 frame with the Starting AID=1 & N=18 to a group of electronic devices 102 a (that includes sink electronic device) to 102q, is mentioned, and also the AP 101 transmitting a basic trigger frame (TF) 903 whose destinations are set to be the STA 102a and the STA 102b, is mentioned and also see para [0053]). Ouchi et al. teach the above method comprising generating, by the source electronic device, a group addressed frame comprising a specific association identifier (AID) for the group addressed frame, but Ouchi et al. is silent in teaching the above method comprising generating, by the source electronic device, a group addressed frame comprising a preamble comprising a basic service set (BSS) specific association identifier (AID) for the group addressed frame. However, Ghosh et al. teach a method (see Abstract and Fig.2) comprising generating, by the source electronic device, a group addressed frame comprising a preamble comprising a basic service set (BSS) specific association identifier (AID) for the group addressed frame (see para [0022] wherein the AP being a basic service set (BSS) AP 102 configured to communicate with the STAs 103, is mentioned, also see para [0028] wherein the master station (e.g., an AP 102) and/or HE devices 104 generating an HE packet in accordance with a short/long preamble format, is mentioned, also see para [0052] wherein an AID being used to identify the associated STAs, is mentioned and also see para [0110] wherein the STAs 103 may receive a trigger frame (TF) in a channel from a basic service set (BSS) AP 102 during a TXOP obtained by the BSS AP 102, is mentioned, all of which clearly includes and is equivalent to “generating, by the source electronic device, a group addressed frame comprising a preamble comprising a basic service set (BSS) specific association identifier (AID) for the group addressed frame”). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skills in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the above method of Ouchi et al. to include generating, by the source electronic device, a group addressed frame comprising a preamble comprising a basic service set (BSS) specific association identifier (AID) for the group addressed frame, disclosed by Ghosh et al. in order to provide an effective mechanism of an access point for efficiently providing range estimation of wireless STAs in a wireless network by using transmissions between the AP and STAs to estimate distances from the STAs to the AP and also providing efficient data transmission between the STAs and the AP in the wireless communication system. Regarding claim 9, Ouchi et al. teach a source electronic device (see Abstract and Figures 2/9, AP 101 for source electronic device), comprising: a memory (see Fig.2, storage unit 201/memory and para [0030]); and one or more processors communicatively coupled to the memory (see Fig.2, units 202/203 for memory and para [0031]) and configured to: generate a group addressed frame comprising a specific association identifier (AID) for the group addressed frame (see Fig.9 and para [0066] wherein the AP 101 transmitting an NDP report TF 901 frame with the Starting AID=1 & N=18 to a group of electronic devices 102 a to 102q, is mentioned, and also the AP 101 transmitting a basic trigger frame (TF) 903 whose destinations are set to be the STA 102a and the STA 102b, is mentioned and also see paragraphs [0038] & [0053]); and transmit the group addressed frame to a sink electronic device (see Fig.9 and para [0066] wherein the AP 101 transmitting an NDP report TF 901 frame with the Starting AID=1 & N=18 to a group of electronic devices 102 a (that includes sink electronic device) to 102q, is mentioned, and also the AP 101 transmitting a basic trigger frame (TF) 903 whose destinations are set to be the STA 102a and the STA 102b, is mentioned and also see para [0053]). Ouchi et al. teach the above source electronic device comprising generating a group addressed frame comprising a specific association identifier (AID) for the group addressed frame as mentioned above, but Ouchi et al. is silent in teaching the above electronic device comprising generating a group addressed frame comprising a preamble comprising a basic service set (BSS) specific association identifier (AID) for the group addressed frame. However, Ghosh et al. teach an electronic device (see Abstract and Fig.2, master station 202) comprising generating a group addressed frame comprising a preamble comprising a basic service set (BSS) specific association identifier (AID) for the group addressed frame (see para [0022] wherein the AP being a basic service set (BSS) AP 102 configured to communicate with the STAs 103, is mentioned, also see para [0028] wherein the master station (e.g., an AP 102) and/or HE devices 104 generating an HE packet in accordance with a short/long preamble format, is mentioned, also see para [0052] wherein an AID being used to identify the associated STAs, is mentioned and also see para [0110] wherein the STAs 103 may receive a trigger frame (TF) in a channel from a basic service set (BSS) AP 102 during a TXOP obtained by the BSS AP 102, is mentioned, all of which clearly includes and is equivalent to “generating, by the source electronic device, a group addressed frame comprising a preamble comprising a basic service set (BSS) specific association identifier (AID) for the group addressed frame”). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skills in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the above source electronic device of Ouchi et al. to include generating a group addressed frame comprising a preamble comprising a basic service set (BSS) specific association identifier (AID) for the group addressed frame, disclosed by Ghosh et al. in order to provide an effective mechanism of an access point for efficiently providing range estimation of wireless STAs in a wireless network by using transmissions between the AP and STAs to estimate distances from the STAs to the AP and also providing efficient data transmission between the STAs and the AP in the wireless communication system. Regarding claims 6 and 14, Ouchi et al. and Ghosh et al. together teach the method/source electronic device of claims 1/9, respectively. Ouchi et al. further teach the method/source electronic device of claims 1/9, further comprising/wherein the one or more processors is further configured to: receiving/receive a block acknowledgment frame from the sink electronic device (see para [0067] wherein upon receiving the DL MU PPDU 906, each STA transmitting an acknowledgment (Ack 907) to the AP 101, is mentioned). Regarding claims 7, 8 and 15, Ouchi et al. and Ghosh et al. together teach the method/source electronic device of claims 1/9, respectively. Ouchi et al. further teach the method/source electronic device of claims 1/9, wherein transmitting the group addressed frame comprises transmitting a physical layer convergence protocol data unit (PPDU) and wherein the PPDU comprises a plurality of group addressed frames including the group addressed frame, wherein the PPDU comprises a multi user (MU) PPDU/wherein to transmit the group addressed frame, the one or more processors are further configured to transmit a multi user (MU) physical layer convergence protocol data unit (PPDU) and wherein the MU PPDU comprises a plurality of group addressed frames including the group addressed frame (see Fig.9 and para [0066] wherein the AP 101 transmitting a trigger frame (TF) 903 whose destinations are set to be the STA 102a and the STA 102b, is mentioned and also see para [0067] wherein the AP 101 transmitting DL MU (Multi User) data (DL MU PPDU 906) after transmitting the Multi-STA BA, is mentioned). Regarding claim 16, Ouchi et al. teach a non-transitory computer-readable medium storing instructions that, when executed by a processor of a source electronic device (see Abstract and Figures 2/9, AP 101 for source electronic device and para [0031]), cause the source device to perform operations, the operations comprising: generating a group addressed frame comprising a specific association identifier (AID) for the group addressed frame (see Fig.9 and para [0066] wherein the AP 101 transmitting an NDP report TF 901 frame with the Starting AID=1 & N=18 to a group of electronic devices 102 a to 102q, is mentioned, and also the AP 101 transmitting a basic trigger frame (TF) 903 whose destinations are set to be the STA 102a and the STA 102b, is mentioned and also see paragraphs [0038] & [0053]); and transmitting the group addressed frame to a sink electronic device (see Fig.9 and para [0066] wherein the AP 101 transmitting an NDP report TF 901 frame with the Starting AID=1 & N=18 to a group of electronic devices 102 a (that includes sink electronic device) to 102q, is mentioned, and also the AP 101 transmitting a basic trigger frame (TF) 903 whose destinations are set to be the STA 102a and the STA 102b, is mentioned and also see para [0053]). Ouchi et al. teach the above medium comprising generating a group addressed frame comprising a specific association identifier (AID) for the group addressed frame as mentioned above, but Ouchi et al. is silent in teaching the above medium comprising generating a group addressed frame comprising a preamble comprising a basic service set (BSS) specific association identifier (AID) for the group addressed frame. However, Ghosh et al. teach a system (see Abstract and Fig.2, master station 202) comprising generating a group addressed frame comprising a preamble comprising a basic service set (BSS) specific association identifier (AID) for the group addressed frame (see para [0022] wherein the AP being a basic service set (BSS) AP 102 configured to communicate with the STAs 103, is mentioned, also see para [0028] wherein the master station (e.g., an AP 102) and/or HE devices 104 generating an HE packet in accordance with a short/long preamble format, is mentioned, also see para [0052] wherein an AID being used to identify the associated STAs, is mentioned and also see para [0110] wherein the STAs 103 may receive a trigger frame (TF) in a channel from a basic service set (BSS) AP 102 during a TXOP obtained by the BSS AP 102, is mentioned, all of which clearly includes and is equivalent to “generating a group addressed frame comprising a preamble comprising a basic service set (BSS) specific association identifier (AID) for the group addressed frame”). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skills in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the above medium of Ouchi et al. to include generating a group addressed frame comprising a preamble comprising a basic service set (BSS) specific association identifier (AID) for the group addressed frame, disclosed by Ghosh et al. in order to provide an effective mechanism of an access point for efficiently providing range estimation of wireless STAs in a wireless network by using transmissions between the AP and STAs to estimate distances from the STAs to the AP and also providing efficient data transmission between the STAs and the AP in the wireless communication system. Regarding claim 20, Ouchi et al. and Ghosh et al. together teach the non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 16. Ouchi et al. further teach the non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 16, wherein transmitting the group addressed frame comprises transmitting a physical layer convergence protocol data unit (PPDU) and wherein the PPDU comprises a plurality of group addressed frames including the group addressed frame and the operations further comprising: receiving a block acknowledgment frame from the sink electronic device (see Fig.9 and para [0066] wherein the AP 101 transmitting a trigger frame (TF) 903 whose destinations are set to be the STA 102a and the STA 102b, is mentioned and also see para [0067] wherein the AP 101 transmitting DL MU (Multi User) data (DL MU PPDU 906) after transmitting the Multi-STA BA, is mentioned and also wherein upon receiving the DL MU PPDU 906, each STA transmitting an acknowledgment (Ack 907) to the AP 101, is mentioned). 5. Claims 2, 10 and 17 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Ouchi et al. (US Pub. No: 2020/0221516 A1) in view of Ghosh et al. (US Pub. No: 2019/0373599 A1) and further in view of Venkatesan (US Pub. No: 2016/0381716 A1). Regarding claims 2, 10 and 17, Ouchi et al. and Ghosh et al. together teach the method/source electronic device/non-transitory computer-readable medium of claims 1/9/16 respectively. Ouchi et al. and Ghosh et al. together yet are silent in teaching the method/source electronic device/non-transitory computer-readable medium of claims 1/9/16, wherein the group addressed frame further comprises data and a request for block acknowledgment for the group addressed frame. However, Venkatesan teaches a method/source electronic device/system (see Abstract and Fig.1) wherein the group addressed frame further comprises data and a request for block acknowledgment for the group addressed frame (see para [0072] wherein in Fig.6, an example Block Acknowledge Request (BlockACKReq) frame 600 for use by an originating device (e.g., the AP 104 of FIGS. 1 and 2) to request from a destination device (e.g., the STA 102 of FIGS. 1 and 2) a BlockACK for multicast transmissions, is mentioned and also, BlockACKReq frame 600 is also to inform the destination device (e.g., the STA 102 of FIGS. 1 and 2) of a GCR mode identified in an example GCR mode field 602, is mentioned and also the BlockACKReq frame 600 may be sent by the originating device at any time during the GLK-GCR link 202 in a quality of service control frame to inform the intended recipient device how the GLK-GCR BlockACK mode 210 is to be used for the forthcoming one or more multicast transmissions, is mentioned and also see para [0069]). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skills in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the above method/source electronic device/non-transitory computer-readable medium of Ouchi et al. and Ghosh et al. to have the group addressed frame further comprising data and a request for block acknowledgment for the group addressed frame, disclosed by Venkatesan in order to provide an effective mechanism of wireless stations for efficiently establishing Groupcast with Retries service for wireless communications over bridged links and also confirming a General Link and the Groupcast with Retries service between the wireless station and the access point based on the association response indicating that the access point has successfully associated the wireless station with the access point in wireless communication system. Allowable Subject Matter 6. Claims 3-5, 11-13, 18 and 19 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion 7. The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Patil et al. (US Pub. No: 2020/0213933 A1) disclose mechanisms relating to methods and apparatuses for operating a wireless station in a multiple basic service set identifier (BSSID) set including a transmitted BSSID (Tx BSSID) and a number of non-transmitted BSSIDs (non-Tx BSSIDs) in wireless communication system. Qian et al. (US Pub. No: 2009/0060009 A1) disclose mechanisms relating to generating an aggregate data frame such as an Aggregated Media Access Control Service Data Unit (A-MSDU) in wireless communication system. Sammour et al. (US Pub. No: 2006/0252443 A1) disclose mechanisms relating to wireless packet data communication systems in general, and in particular to a method and system for efficient addressing and power savings in wireless communication systems. Abraham et al. (US Pub. No: 2016/0249208 A1) disclose mechanisms relating to methods and devices for forming neighbor-aware or social Wi-Fi network groups and communication within neighbor-aware or social Wi-Fi network groups. Xu (US Pub. No: 2007/0237120 A1) disclose mechanisms relating to aggregating packets in the Medium Access Control (MAC) layer of an AP in wireless communication system. 8. Any response to this office action should be faxed to (571) 273-8300 or mailed To: Commissioner for Patents, P.O. Box 1450 Alexandria, VA 22313-1450 Hand-delivered responses should be brought to Customer Service Window Randolph Building 401 Dulany Street Alexandria, VA 22314. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to SRINIVASA R REDDIVALAM whose telephone number is (571)270-3524. The examiner can normally be reached on M-F 10-7 EST. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, CHIRAG G SHAH can be reached on 571-272-3144. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see https://ppair-my.uspto.gov/pair/PrivatePair. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /SRINIVASA R REDDIVALAM/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2477 7/3/2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 24, 2024
Application Filed
Jul 07, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12684547
COMMUNICATION METHOD AND COMMUNICATION APPARATUS
2y 9m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12677261
METHODS AND ARRANGEMENTS FOR LARGE RESOURCE UNIT ALLOCATION
5y 0m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12672116
MULTI-BAND SPECTRUM ALLOCATION FOR CELLULAR NETWORKS
4y 1m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12666377
DOWNLINK LOOP OPERATION IN A NON-TERRESTRIAL NETWORK
4y 0m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12659016
LOCATION INFORMATION IN NON-TERRESTRIAL NETWORKS
4y 2m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
80%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+22.7%)
3y 3m (~1y 5m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 563 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month