Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 16, 2026
Application No. 18/894,357

COOLING DEVICE, SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING APPARATUS AND SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING METHOD

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Sep 24, 2024
Priority
Jun 13, 2022 — JP 2022-095225 +1 more
Examiner
TRPISOVSKY, JOSEPH F
Art Unit
3763
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Canon Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
70%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
10m
Est. Remaining
90%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 70% — above average
70%
Career Allowance Rate
536 granted / 763 resolved
At TC average
Strong +20% interview lift
Without
With
+19.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 10m
Avg Prosecution
14 currently pending
Career history
779
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.7%
-39.3% vs TC avg
§103
51.2%
+11.2% vs TC avg
§102
19.8%
-20.2% vs TC avg
§112
27.0%
-13.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 763 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of Species A, Fig. 1, claims 1-4, 10, 11 and 13-26 in the reply filed on 07/16/2026 is acknowledged. Claims 5-9, 12 are withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b) as being drawn to a nonelected species, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Election was made without traverse in the reply filed on 07/16/2026. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. Claim(s) 1-4, 10, 11 and 14-16 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Nomoto (US PG Pub. 2021/0404711) in view of Okazaki et al. (JP 2004232951 A). Regarding claim 1, Nomoto discloses a cooling device for cooling a cooling target, comprising: a circulation system (CA, Fig. 1) configured to circulate a refrigerant for cooling the cooling target (80; paragraph 22), wherein a container (7) including a region where heat is exchanged between the refrigerant and at least a part of the cooling target is provided in the circulation system (paragraph 24), the circulation system circulates the refrigerant so that the refrigerant enters the container at a predetermined temperature (paragraph 24). Nomoto does not explicitly teach the refrigerant is a mixed refrigerant obtained by mixing a first refrigerant of a first boiling point and a second refrigerant of a second boiling point higher than the first boiling point, the circulation system circulates the mixed refrigerant so that the mixed refrigerant enters the container at a predetermined temperature, and the first refrigerant has a vapor pressure higher than a pressure resistance of the container at the predetermined temperature. Okazaki teaches the concept of a cooling device utilizing a refrigerant that is a mixed refrigerant obtained by mixing a first refrigerant of a first boiling point and a second refrigerant of a second boiling point higher than the first boiling point (paragraphs 36-37) and the first refrigerant has a vapor pressure higher than a pressure resistance of the container at the predetermined temperature (paragraphs 23-24, 36-37) that allows the system to efficiently operate by overcoming the problem of pressure resistance and improving the operating efficiency of the system (paragraphs 21-22). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of filing to modify the cooling device of Nomoto to have the refrigerant include a mixed refrigerant obtained by mixing a first refrigerant of a first boiling point and a second refrigerant of a second boiling point higher than the first boiling point, the circulation system circulates the mixed refrigerant so that the mixed refrigerant enters the container at a predetermined temperature, and the first refrigerant has a vapor pressure higher than a pressure resistance of the container at the predetermined temperature taught by Okazaki in order to overcome the pressure resistance and losses in the system and achieve higher operating efficiency. Regarding claim 2, Nomoto as modified discloses the cooling device according to claim 1, wherein the circulation system circulates the mixed refrigerant so that the region is exposed to the mixed refrigerant having entered the container while the first refrigerant and the second refrigerant are in a liquid phase state, and the mixed refrigerant including the first refrigerant, a part of which is in a vapor phase state, and the second refrigerant in the liquid phase state is discharged from the container (adding the teachings of Okazaki to the system of Nomoto would allow the circulation system circulates the mixed refrigerant so that the region is exposed to the mixed refrigerant having entered the container while the first refrigerant and the second refrigerant are in a liquid phase state, and the mixed refrigerant including the first refrigerant, a part of which is in a vapor phase state, and the second refrigerant in the liquid phase state is discharged from the container). Regarding claim 3, Nomoto as modified discloses the cooling device according to claim 1, wherein the first refrigerant and the second refrigerant are mixed at such mixing ratio that the first refrigerant ebullient-cools the cooling target to enter a vapor phase state in the region, and the second refrigerant convection-cools the cooling target in a liquid phase state and compresses the first refrigerant in the vapor phase state in the region (adding the teachings of Okazaki to the system of Nomoto would allow the first refrigerant and the second refrigerant to be mixed at such mixing ratio that the first refrigerant ebullient-cools the cooling target to enter a vapor phase state in the region, and the second refrigerant convection-cools the cooling target in a liquid phase state and compresses the first refrigerant in the vapor phase state in the region). Regarding claim 4, Nomoto as modified discloses the cooling device according to claim 1, and Okazaki further teaches wherein the mixed refrigerant is a non-azeotropic mixed refrigerant (Abstract). Regarding claim 10¸ Nomoto as modified discloses the cooling device according to claim 1, wherein a heater (4) configured to heat the mixed refrigerant so that a temperature of the mixed refrigerant becomes the predetermined temperature is provided in the circulation system (paragraph 23). Regarding claim 11, Nomoto as modified discloses the cooling device according to claim 1, wherein a condenser (2) configured to condense a mixed refrigerant in a gas-liquid mixed phase state discharged from the container to obtain a mixed refrigerant in a liquid phase state, a pump (3) configured to send the mixed refrigerant in the liquid phase state from the condenser, and a pressure reducer (6) configured to reduce a pressure of the mixed refrigerant in the liquid phase state sent from the pump and supply the mixed refrigerant to the container are provided in the circulation system (Fig. 1). Regarding claim 14, Nomoto as modified discloses a semiconductor manufacturing apparatus (paragraph 1) that includes a heat generating portion (paragraph 2), comprising: a cooling device defined in claim 1, wherein the cooling device is configured to cool the heat generating portion as a cooling target (80). Regarding claim 15, Nomoto as modified discloses the semiconductor manufacturing apparatus according to claim 14, wherein the semiconductor manufacturing apparatus is formed as a pattern forming apparatus configured to form a pattern (paragraph 2). Regarding claim 16, Nomoto as modified discloses a semiconductor manufacturing method comprising: a step of processing a substrate by a semiconductor manufacturing apparatus defined in claim 14 (paragraph 10); and a step of treating the substrate processed in the step (paragraph 51). Claim 13 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Nomoto (US PG Pub. 2021/0404711) in view of Okazaki et al. (JP 2004232951 A) further in view of Nishiyama et al. (US PG Pub. 2019/0277549). Regarding claim 13, Nomoto as modified discloses the cooling device according to claim 1, but does not explicitly teach wherein the first refrigerant is one of R1234zeE and R-1234yf. Nishiyama teaches the concept of a cooling device including a refrigeration cycle that uses R1234yf as a known non-azeotropic refrigerant mixture to be circulated in the refrigerant circulation system (paragraph 87). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of filing to modify the cooling device of Nomoto to have the first refrigerant is one of R1234zeE and R-1234yf in order to select a known material based upon its suitability for its intended use (see MPEP 2144.07). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JOSEPH F TRPISOVSKY whose telephone number is (571)270-5296. The examiner can normally be reached M-F: 8AM-4PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jerry-Daryl Fletcher can be reached at (571) 270-5054. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JOSEPH F TRPISOVSKY/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3763
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 24, 2024
Application Filed
Aug 20, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12760927
WINDOW AIR CONDITIONER DRAIN
1y 11m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12742583
COOLED CONTAINER AND METHOD FOR DISTRIBUTING COOLED ITEMS
3y 6m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12736272
EVAPORATION TRAY FOR REFRIGERATOR CONDENSATION WATER
2y 2m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12736232
AIR CONDITIONER CONSTITUENT UNIT AND AIR CONDITIONER
1y 9m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12736266
COOLER
1y 1m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
70%
Grant Probability
90%
With Interview (+19.9%)
2y 10m (~10m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 763 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month