Prosecution Insights
Last updated: September 27, 2026
Application No. 18/895,220

INTERCHANGEABLE PET COLLAR SYSTEM

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Sep 24, 2024
Examiner
PRICE JR, RICHARD THOMAS
Art Unit
3643
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Miamilo Limited
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
87%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
93%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 87% — above average
87%
Career Allowance Rate
939 granted / 1076 resolved
+35.3% vs TC avg
Moderate +6% lift
Without
With
+5.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
1y 11m
Avg Prosecution
16 currently pending
Career history
1091
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.4%
-38.6% vs TC avg
§103
29.0%
-11.0% vs TC avg
§102
35.5%
-4.5% vs TC avg
§112
22.5%
-17.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1076 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1-5 and 7-11 and 20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Pearson (US Patent 6,012,203) in view of Petty (US Patent 6,125,793) and Johnson et al (US Patent 5,097,679). Pearson teaches an interchangeable snap-on adornments for fashion accessories which are structurally similar to an collar. Regarding claims 1 and 20, the Applicant’s attention is directed to Figure 20. The device of Pearson teaches a belt or collar-like strap (unnumbered) which is structurally similar to the Applicant’s claimed collar. A charm 10 is placed thru the belt and an anti rotation plate 30 is coupled to the charm. However, Pearson does not teach a threaded stem nor a multi layered belt or collar like device. Johnson et al teach a threaded stem for securing a charm onto an object. Regarding claims 1 and 20, it would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art at time the application was filed to modify the apparatus of Pearson with a threaded stem connection Johnson et al and the multi layer collar or belt Petty, in order to provide an alternative and more secure way of attaching the charm to the belt and to provide the belt with an expandable and more resilient strength. Regarding claims 2 and 3, the reference to Pearson teaches at least one bent corner made from a durable material to function properly and surrounds the stem of the charm. Regarding claims 4 and 5, the anti rotation plate 30 surrounds the threaded stem in a concentric manner. Regarding claim 6, it would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art at the time the application was filed to modify the combination Pearson as modified by Petty and Johnson et al to use an adhesive layer to attach the charm to the ARP. As for claims 7 and 8, in the combination of Pearson as modified by Petty and Johnson et al, the reference to Johnson et al teaches a screw like element 18. As for claims 9 and 10, the reference to Johnson et al teach a threaded stem (unnumbered) is configured to receive the screw 18. As for claim 11, the reference to Petty as shown in figure 5, the middle layer 46 is located between the top layer 26 and the base layer 34. Contact Information Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to RICHARD T. PRICE JR whose telephone number is (571)272-6892. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 7AM-3:30PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Peter M. Poon can be reached at 571-272-6891. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /RICHARD T PRICE JR/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3643
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 24, 2024
Application Filed
Sep 10, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12733652
SYSTEM FOR HANGING POULTRY
1y 6m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12721865
METHOD FOR ADMINISTERING AN ANTIMICROBIAL TREATMENT TO AN ANIMAL IN A MEAT PROCESSING OPERATION
2y 4m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12721356
FISH FILLETING STAND DEVICE
1y 3m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12677840
APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR SEPARATING MEAT FROM BONE
1y 7m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12667111
Closing Machine For Closing Sausage Products
1y 6m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
87%
Grant Probability
93%
With Interview (+5.9%)
1y 11m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1076 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month