Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/895,852

DATA TRANSMISSION METHOD AND APPARATUS

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Sep 25, 2024
Examiner
TRAN, KHAI
Art Unit
2632
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
94%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 2m
To Grant
94%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 94% — above average
94%
Career Allow Rate
1147 granted / 1227 resolved
+31.5% vs TC avg
Minimal +0% lift
Without
With
+0.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 2m
Avg Prosecution
23 currently pending
Career history
1250
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
7.5%
-32.5% vs TC avg
§103
35.6%
-4.4% vs TC avg
§102
20.1%
-19.9% vs TC avg
§112
21.4%
-18.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1227 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . The preliminary amendment filed on 11/06/2024 has been entered. Claims 1-12 are pending in this Office action Oath/Declaration The Oath or Declaration is being considered by examiner and complies with PTO requirements. Drawings The drawings were received on 09/25/2024. These drawings are reviewed and accepted by the Examiner. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statements (IDSs), submitted on 10/30/2024, and 05/30/2025 are in compliance with the provisions of 37 CRR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statements are being considered by the examiner. Specification The disclosure is objected to because of the following informalities: In [0041], line 3, the term “CRS” should be --CSI-RS--. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1, 5 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Qian et al (US 2018/0123659) hereinafter Qian in view of Sahraci et al (US 2021/0359731) coted in IDS filed 10/30/2024 hereinafter Sahraci. Regarding claim 1, Qian discloses a method comprising: receiving a first precoding matrix indicator (PMI) from a terminal, wherein the first PMI indicates a first weight matrix; determining a second weight matrix based on the first weight matrix (see Abstract, a first generating unit configured to generate a first pre-coding matrix according to first channel information on a channel between a first communication apparatus and a second communication apparatus; a second generating unit configured to generate a second pre-coding matrix according to the first pre-coding matrix and second channel information on the channel). Qian fails to explicitly disclose determining a non-equal power weight matrix based on a non-equal coefficient matrix and the second weight matrix; and sending data to the terminal based on the non-equal power weight matrix. Sahraci discloses determining a non-equal power weight matrix based on a non-equal coefficient matrix and the second weight matrix; and sending data to the terminal based on the non-equal power weight matrix (see [0094], [0125], [0223], [0262] to [0268]). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at before the effective filling date of the claimed invention to determine a non-equal power weight matrix based on a non-equal coefficient matrix and the second weight matrix; and send data to the terminal based on the non-equal power weight matrix as taught Sahraci into the teachings of Qian in order to determine a redistribution matrix that provides a reduced variance of transmission powers for a number of transmission channels, where a product of the null space matrix and the redistribution matrix may be computed and added to the precoding matrix to generate a modified precoding matrix. Claim 5 is similar to claim 1. Sahraci also discloses a processor; and a non-transitory computer-readable storage medium storing a program to be executed by the processor (see [0010], [0162]). Therefore, claim 5 is rejected under a similar rationale. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 2-4, 6-12 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Li et al (US 2013/0286884) disclose a method and device for determining channel quality indication information. Zhang et al (US 2020/0322933) disclose a method and apparatus for obtaining downlink channel information. Ren et al (US 2022/0094412) disclose a channel measurement method and communications apparatus. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to KHAI TRAN whose telephone number is (571)272-3019. The examiner can normally be reached until 4:00PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Chieh Fan can be reached at 571-272-3042. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /KHAI TRAN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2632 KT January 20, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 25, 2024
Application Filed
Nov 06, 2024
Response after Non-Final Action
Jan 20, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12603678
RECEPTION-SIDE APPARATUS AND RADIO COMMUNICATION METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12603673
FREQUENCY HOPPING AND FIXED FREQUENCY SELECTION FOR AMBIENT INTERNET OF THINGS (IOT) DEVICES
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12603682
NON-INTEGER MULTIPLE QUANTITIES OF TRANSMIT AND RECEIVE ANTENNA SUBARRAYS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12587238
MECHANICAL STATE CONFIGURATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12587257
BEAM MANAGEMENT IN CELLULAR SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
94%
Grant Probability
94%
With Interview (+0.2%)
2y 2m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1227 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month