Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/896,194

RADIATION IMAGING APPARATUS, RADIATION IMAGING SYSTEM, AND METHOD OF CONTROLLING RADIATION IMAGING APPARATUS

Non-Final OA §102§112
Filed
Sep 25, 2024
Priority
Sep 26, 2023 — JP 2023-162861
Examiner
FOX, DANIELLE A
Art Unit
2884
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Canon Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
83%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
9m
Est. Remaining
96%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 83% — above average
83%
Career Allowance Rate
613 granted / 736 resolved
+15.3% vs TC avg
Moderate +13% lift
Without
With
+13.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
14 currently pending
Career history
749
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.6%
-38.4% vs TC avg
§103
63.3%
+23.3% vs TC avg
§102
27.2%
-12.8% vs TC avg
§112
1.9%
-38.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 736 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Objections Claim 19 is objected to because of the following informalities: please correct the end of line 3 to read “the method comprising:”. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 2-6 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 2 recites language that is unintelligible and the scope of the claim cannot be reasonably ascertained. Clams 3-6 depend on claim 2. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by US 2020/0166659 (Fujiyoshi). Regarding claim 1, Fujiyoshi disclose a radiation imaging apparatus comprising: a radiation detecting panel in which a plurality of pixels including a first kind of pixel ([0024], Fig. 1, imaging pixels 101) and a second kind of pixel ([0024], Fig. 1, detection pixels 104 used to monitor a radiation irradiation dose) are arranged in a matrix (Fig. 1); a unit configured to obtain a cumulative dose information by performing dose detecting operation for reading charge of the second kind of pixel a plurality of times in a situation where radiation is irradiated and charge is accumulated in the first kind of pixel ([0032] and [0040]-[0043]); a unit configured to perform processing of stopping the dose detecting operation and stopping the irradiation of radiation based on a combination of a first threshold condition and the cumulative dose information or a combination of a second threshold condition and the cumulative dose information ([0032] and [0040]-[0043]); and a unit configured to read the charge of each of the first kind of pixel and the second kind of pixel and obtain a radiation image [0043]. Regarding claim 2, Fujiyoshi disclose the radiation imaging apparatus according to claim 1, wherein: the second threshold condition increases with time; and relationship between the first threshold condition and the second threshold condition becomes from relationship in which the second threshold condition is equal to or smaller than the first threshold condition to relationship in which the second threshold condition is greater than the first threshold condition, with time ((Fig. 6, [0042], [0051], [0058]). Regarding claim 3, Fujiyoshi disclose the radiation imaging apparatus according to claim 2, wherein the second threshold condition is determined based on delay time from output of a stop signal for stopping the irradiation of radiation up to a stop of the irradiation of radiation (Fig. 6, [0042], [0051], [0058]). Regarding claim 4, Fujiyoshi disclose the radiation imaging apparatus according to claim 3, wherein the delay time includes communication delay time of the stop signal and delay time for control of stopping the irradiation of radiation (Fig. 6, [0042], [0051], [0058]). Regarding claim 5, Fujiyoshi disclose the radiation imaging apparatus according to claim 2, wherein the second threshold condition increases with time based on start time of the irradiation of radiation (Fig. 6, [0042], [0051], [0058]). Regarding claim 6, Fujiyoshi disclose the radiation imaging apparatus according to claim 5, wherein the start time of the irradiation of radiation is time at which the cumulative dose information is equal to or greater than a third threshold condition different from the first and second threshold conditions (Fig. 6, [0042], [0051], [0058]). Regarding claim 7, Fujiyoshi disclose the radiation imaging apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the unit configured to perform the processing of stopping the irradiation of radiation: calculates waiting time until irradiated dose of the radiation exceeds the second threshold condition by using elapsed time at time when the dose detecting operation is stopped and the cumulative dose information; and performs the processing of stopping the irradiation of radiation if the waiting time has elapsed from the elapsed time (Fig. 6, [0042], [0051], [0058]). Regarding claim 8, Fujiyoshi disclose the radiation imaging apparatus of claim 7, wherein the unit configured to perform the processing of stopping the irradiation of radiation: calculates the waiting time by further using target dose and delay time from output of a stop signal for stopping the irradiation of radiation up to a stop of the irradiation of radiation; and performs the processing of stopping the irradiation of radiation if the waiting time has elapsed from the elapsed time (Fig. 6, [0042], [0051], [0058]). Regarding claim 9, Fujiyoshi disclose the radiation imaging apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the unit configured to perform the processing of stopping the irradiation of radiation determines whether waiting time until the processing of stopping the irradiation of radiation is performed has elapsed by using the cumulative dose information, elapsed time at time when the dose detecting operation is stopped, and the second threshold condition (Fig. 6, [0042], [0051], [0058]). Regarding claim 10, Fujiyoshi disclose the radiation imaging apparatus according to claim 9, wherein the unit configured to perform the processing of stopping the irradiation of radiation: determines dose per one sampling time of the dose detection operation by using the cumulative dose information and the elapsed time; adds the dose per one sampling time to the cumulative dose information for each sampling time; determines that the waiting time has elapsed if the cumulative value of dose to which the dose per one sampling time is added is equal to or greater than the second threshold condition (Fig. 6, [0042], [0051], [0058]). Regarding claim 11, Fujiyoshi disclose the radiation imaging apparatus according to claim 1, further comprising a unit configured to change a threshold used for the processing of stopping the irradiation of radiation from the second threshold condition to the first threshold condition based on elapsed time from start of the irradiation of radiation (Fig. 6, [0042], [0051], [0058]). Regarding claim 12, Fujiyoshi disclose the radiation imaging apparatus according to claim 11, wherein: the second threshold condition increases with time; relationship between the first threshold condition and the second threshold condition becomes from relationship in which the second threshold condition is equal to or smaller than the first threshold condition to relationship in which the second threshold condition is greater than the first threshold condition, with time; and the unit configured to change the threshold used for the processing of stopping the irradiation of radiation changes the threshold used for the processing of stopping the irradiation of radiation from the second threshold condition to the first threshold condition if the second threshold condition is greater than the first threshold condition at the elapsed time (Fig. 6, [0042], [0051], [0058]). Regarding claim 13, Fujiyoshi disclose the radiation imaging apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the first threshold condition is a threshold for accumulating charge used to generate the radiation image in the second kind of pixel (Fig. 6, [0042], [0051], [0058]). Regarding claim 14, Fujiyoshi disclose the radiation imaging apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the first threshold condition is determined based on a predetermined rate of target dose (Fig. 6, [0042], [0051], [0058]). Regarding claim 15, Fujiyoshi disclose the radiation imaging apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the first threshold condition is determined based on an absolute amount of dose required to generate the radiation image (Fig. 6, [0042], [0051], [0058]). Regarding claim 16, Fujiyoshi disclose the radiation imaging apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the first threshold condition decreases with time based on start time of the irradiation of radiation (Fig. 6, [0042], [0051], [0058]). Regarding claim 17, Fujiyoshi disclose the radiation imaging apparatus according to claim 1, wherein: each of the plurality of pixels includes a detection element arranged to detect the radiation and a switch element arranged to switch output of a signal from the detection element, the unit configured to stop the dose detecting operation stops the reading of the charge from the second kind of pixel by turning off the switch element of the second kind of pixel (Fig. 6, [0042], [0051], [0058]). Regarding claim 18, Fujiyoshi disclose a radiation imaging system comprising: a controlling apparatus configured to control a radiation generating apparatus arranged to generate radiation; and the radiation imaging apparatus according to claim 1 (Fig. 6, [0042], [0051], [0058]). Regarding claim 19, Fujiyoshi disclose a method of controlling a radiation imaging apparatus comprising a radiation detecting panel in which a plurality of pixels including a first kind of pixel and a second kind of pixel are arranged in a matrix, the method comprising: obtaining a cumulative dose information by performing a dose detecting operation for reading charge of the second kind of pixel a plurality of times in a situation where radiation is irradiated and charge is accumulated in the first kind of pixel ([0032] and [0040]-[0043]); performing processing of stopping the dose detecting operation and stopping the irradiation of radiation based on a combination of a first threshold condition and the cumulative dose information or a combination of a second threshold condition and the cumulative dose information ([0032] and [0040]-[0043]); and reading the charge of each of the first kind of pixel and the second kind of pixel and obtain a radiation image [0043]. Regarding claim 20, Fujiyoshi disclose a radiation imaging apparatus comprising: a radiation detecting panel in which a plurality of pixels including a first kind of pixel ([0024], Fig. 1, imaging pixels 101) and a second kind of pixel ([0024], Fig. 1, detection pixels 104 used to monitor a radiation irradiation dose) are arranged in a matrix (Fig. 1); a unit configured to obtain a cumulative dose information by performing dose detecting operation for reading charge of the second kind of pixel a plurality of times in a situation where radiation is irradiated and charge is accumulated in the first kind of pixel ([0032] and [0040]-[0043]); a unit configured to perform processing of stopping the dose detecting operation and stopping the irradiation of radiation based on a combination of a first threshold condition and the cumulative dose information or a combination of a second threshold condition and the cumulative dose information ([0032] and [0040]-[0043]); a unit configured to perform processing of stopping the irradiation of radiation based on a second threshold condition and the cumulative dose information ([0032] and [0040]-[0043]); and a unit configured to read the charge of each of the first kind of pixel and the second kind of pixel and obtain a radiation image [0043]. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to DANI FOX whose telephone number is (571)272-3513. The examiner can normally be reached M-F: 9-5. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, David Makiya can be reached at 571-272-2273. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /DANI FOX/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2884
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 25, 2024
Application Filed
Jun 23, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12678114
METHOD FOR MULTI-ENERGY X-RAY IMAGING, X-RAY FACILITY, TREATMENT SYSTEM, COMPUTER PROGRAM AND ELECTRONICALLY READABLE DATA CARRIER
3y 1m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12681193
SCINTIGRAPHIC INTRACAVITARY MEASUREMENT DEVICE
2y 2m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12672837
SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR ADJUSTMENT OF IMAGING COMPONENTS BASED ON OBJECT DETECTION
3y 1m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12667319
THREE DIMENSIONAL RADIATION IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION
3y 3m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12669451
CORRECTION APPARATUS, CORRECTION METHOD, AND CORRECTION PROGRAM
1y 9m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
83%
Grant Probability
96%
With Interview (+13.0%)
2y 7m (~9m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 736 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month