Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/896,337

METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING METAL COMPONENT ARRANGED IN FLOW PATH FOR HIGH TEMPERATURE FLUID

Final Rejection §103
Filed
Sep 25, 2024
Examiner
DEONAUTH, NIRVANA
Art Unit
3726
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Futaba Industrial Co. Ltd.
OA Round
2 (Final)
69%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
3y 2m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 69% — above average
69%
Career Allow Rate
409 granted / 591 resolved
-0.8% vs TC avg
Strong +34% interview lift
Without
With
+33.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 2m
Avg Prosecution
31 currently pending
Career history
622
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
37.2%
-2.8% vs TC avg
§102
29.9%
-10.1% vs TC avg
§112
29.1%
-10.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 591 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 2, 3 and 5 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Iiroopa (JPS626888B2) in view of Niinomi (US 11,426,779). 4. Regarding to claim 2, Iiroopa discloses a method for manufacturing a metal component [Figure 28 in liroopa], the metal component comprising: a body portion (body portion of 212, as can be seen from Figure 28 in liroopa) that extends in an axial direction and has a cross section [Figure 28 in liroopa], which is perpendicular in the axial direction and includes an arc- shaped area [Figure 28 in Iiroopa]; and a flange (upper flange portion, as can be seen from Figure 28 in Iiroopa) that extends toward a radial outside from one end of the body portion in the axial direction [Figure 28 in Iiroopa], and the first axial end of the cylindrical body bent toward a radial outside so as to enlarge a diameter of the cylindrical body [as can be seen from Figure 28 in Iiroopa]. Iiroopa does not explicitly disclose the method steps of obtaining a cylindrical body by bending a plate material made of metal, the plate material having first and second longitudinal ends and the cylindrical body having first and second axial ends; wherein obtaining the cylindrical body comprises welding the first longitudinal end of the plate material and the second longitudinal end of the plate material, which are formed to face each other by bending the plate material. However, Niinomi further discloses a step of manufacturing a cylindrical body by bending a plate material made of metal (metal plate member 20), the plate material having first and second longitudinal ends and the cylindrical body having first and second axial ends wherein obtaining the cylindrical body comprises welding the first longitudinal end of the plate material and the second longitudinal end of the plate material, which are formed to face each other by bending the plate material [as can be seen from Figures 4-5 in Niinomi]. Therefore it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the method of Iiroopa to include steps of bending a plate material made of metal and welding, as taught by Niinomi, as a known technique used in manufacturing. Furthermore, the recited manufacturing steps are well known techniques used in manufacturing, which would yield predictable results. The combination of Iiroopa and Niinomi discloses a cylindrical body having a first axial end of the cylindrical body bend towards a radial outside so as to enlarge a diameter of the cylindrical body, however does not explicitly disclose a step of bending and cutting out a specified area. However, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the method disclosed by Iiroopa and Niinomi, to include a step of bending and cutting (such as cutting excess material after welding), as a well known technique used in manufacturing as subsequent finishing steps, which would yield predicable results. Regarding to claim 3, the combination of liroopa and Niinomi disclose the method for manufacturing a metal component according to claim 2, having an area of the cylindrical body that is cut out and welded. However, the combination of Iiroopa and Niinomi does not explicitly disclose the area that is cut out and welded including the welded first and second longitudinal ends. However, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the method disclosed by Iiroopa and Niinomi, to include a step of cutting, which would include the cutting/removal of excess material after welding at the first and second longitudinal ends, as a well-known technique used in manufacturing as a subsequent finishing step, which would yield predicable results. 6. Regarding to claim 6, the combination of Iiroopa and Niinomi disclose the method for manufacturing a metal component according to claim 2, being a metal component. However the combination of liroopa and Niinomi does not explicitly disclose the metal component being an exhaust system component that is arranged in a flow path for exhaust gas from an internal combustion engine. However, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the method of the combination of Iiroopa and Niinomi, to be applied to an alternate workpiece, such as an exhaust pipe system workpiece, as a simple substitution of one known workpiece for another, which would yield predictable results. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claim(s) 2-3 and 5 have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to NIRVANA DEONAUTH whose telephone number is (571)270-5949. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 9am-5pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Sunil Singh can be reached at (571)272-3460. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /NIRVANA DEONAUTH/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3726
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 25, 2024
Application Filed
Jul 26, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Oct 24, 2025
Response Filed
Nov 26, 2025
Examiner Interview (Telephonic)
Nov 26, 2025
Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12589817
FUEL TANK BOOST AND BOLT SECURE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12577735
SPIKE TRAY HEAD WITH REPLACEABLE WEAR PLATES
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12558750
SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR TRANSFERRING A PART BEING MACHINED
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Patent 12522983
Cordless Railroad Spike Puller
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 13, 2026
Patent 12454040
BOTTOM BRACKET TOOL
2y 5m to grant Granted Oct 28, 2025
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
69%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+33.7%)
3y 2m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 591 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month