Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 01, 2026
Application No. 18/896,947

METHOD AND DEVICE IN COMMUNICATION NODE FOR WIRELESS COMMUNICATION

Non-Final OA §101§112
Filed
Sep 26, 2024
Priority
Apr 02, 2022 — CN 202210351270.1 +1 more
Examiner
SALAD, ABDULLAHI ELMI
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Apogee Networks LLC
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
85%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 0m
Est. Remaining
94%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 85% — above average
85%
Career Allowance Rate
839 granted / 990 resolved
+24.7% vs TC avg
Moderate +10% lift
Without
With
+9.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 1m
Avg Prosecution
24 currently pending
Career history
1009
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
9.1%
-30.9% vs TC avg
§103
51.6%
+11.6% vs TC avg
§102
20.0%
-20.0% vs TC avg
§112
4.2%
-35.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 990 resolved cases

Office Action

§101 §112
Detailed Office action Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . This office action is in response to the communication dated 9/26/24 Original claims 1-20 are pending Claim 19 is allowed. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claim 1 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 1 recites the limitation "the behavior—'in line 11. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 101 35 U.S.C. 101 reads as follows: Whoever invents or discovers any new and useful process, machine, manufacture, or composition of matter, or any new and useful improvement thereof, may obtain a patent therefor, subject to the conditions and requirements of this title. the claimed invention is directed to non-statutory subject matter. Claims 1- 18 and 20 do not fall within at least one of the four categories of patent eligible subject matter is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 101 because the claimed invention is directed to non-statutory subject matter. For example Claims 1 and 20 sets forth first node comprising "first receiver and first transmitter (as in claim 1 ) and second node comprising second transmitter (as in claim 20). Given their broadest, most reasonable interpretations, the ""first receiver and first transmitter and " second transmitter " can each understandably be implemented via software. In such circumstances, the first node and second of claims 1 and 20 consists of software per se, and fails to fall within one of the statutory categories of intention (i.e. process, machine, manufacture, or composition of matter). Therefore, Claim 1 and 20 are not limited to statutory embodiments. In other words these components are not limited to hardware or not limited to a combination of hardware and software, thus, the claims albeit an attempt to claim a machine, lacks any structural component(s), thereby, the claim as a whole does not fall under any of the patent eligible statutory categories. Under a similar rationale, claims 2-18, which depend from claim 1, are also not limited to statutory embodiments. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ABDULLAHI ELMI SALAD whose telephone number is (571)272-4009. The examiner can normally be reached 9:30AM-6:PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Faruk Hamza can be reached at 571-272-7969. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ABDULLAHI E SALAD/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2466
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 26, 2024
Application Filed
Aug 12, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §101, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12745118
CLI Reporting for MCG/SCG Failure
4y 1m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12744719
ONE-WAY DELAY MEASUREMENT IN A PACKET-SWITCHED COMMUNICATION NETWORK
3y 5m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12744611
Input Synchronization for Cyclic Queueing and Forwarding (CQF)
2y 6m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12726954
Communication Method and Information Processing Apparatus
2y 8m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12719616
APPARATUS, METHOD, AND COMPUTER PROGRAM
2y 3m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
85%
Grant Probability
94%
With Interview (+9.7%)
3y 1m (~1y 0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 990 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month