Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 18, 2026
Application No. 18/897,028

IMAGE FILE, INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS, IMAGING APPARATUS, AND GENERATION METHOD

Final Rejection §101
Filed
Sep 26, 2024
Examiner
GADOMSKI, STEFAN J
Art Unit
2485
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Fujifilm Corporation
OA Round
2 (Final)
76%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
2y 7m
To Grant
83%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 76% — above average
76%
Career Allow Rate
313 granted / 412 resolved
+18.0% vs TC avg
Moderate +7% lift
Without
With
+7.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
26 currently pending
Career history
438
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
5.9%
-34.1% vs TC avg
§103
46.4%
+6.4% vs TC avg
§102
16.7%
-23.3% vs TC avg
§112
22.6%
-17.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 412 resolved cases

Office Action

§101
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Amendment The Amendment filed 03/12/2026 has been entered. Claims 2-3 have been cancelled. Claims 16-19 have been added. Claims 1 and 4-15 have been amended. Claims 1 and 4-19 remain pending in the application. Response to Arguments Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Applicant’s arguments, see page 6, filed 03/12/2026, with respect to the claim objections have been fully considered and are persuasive. The objections have been withdrawn. Applicant’s arguments, see page 7, filed 03/12/2026, with respect to 101 rejections have been fully considered but are not persuasive. Examiner notes the claims are still ineligible because the thrust of the claims are directed toward the data with the non-transitory computer readable media acting as merely a carrier of that data. Applicant’s arguments, see pages 8-10, filed 03/12/2026, with respect to the 103 rejections have been fully considered and are persuasive. Examiner concurs the presented prior art fails to disclose or suggest the amended claim language. An updated search did not result in a reference that would, individually or in combination with the presented prior art, disclose the language of the independent claims. The prior art fails to disclose providing part-position identifying information as part of information related to other pieces of moving image data in the claimed accessory information. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 101 35 U.S.C. 101 reads as follows: Whoever invents or discovers any new and useful process, machine, manufacture, or composition of matter, or any new and useful improvement thereof, may obtain a patent therefor, subject to the conditions and requirements of this title. Claims 1 and 4-12 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 101 because the claimed invention is directed to non-statutory subject matter. The four eligible categories of invention include: (1) process which is an act, or a series of acts or steps, (2) machine which is an concrete thing, consisting of parts, or of certain devices and combination of devices, (3) manufacture which is an article produced from raw or prepared materials by giving to these materials new forms, qualities, properties, or combinations, whether by hand labor or by machinery, and (4) composition of matter which is all compositions of two or more substances and all composite articles, whether they be the results of chemical union, or of mechanical mixture, or whether they be gases, fluids, powders or solids, see MPEP 2106(I). Claims directed toward purely data such as alphanumeric data, image data, video data or music data are not directed toward a process since the data by itself does not perform any steps or acts. And, the claims are not directed toward machine, manufacture or composition of matter because those categories require a tangible object which is not satisfied by pure data. Furthermore, even if the data is placed on a non-transitory computer readable media (i.e. manufacture) the claims would still be ineligible because the thrust of the claims are directed toward the data with the non-transitory computer readable media acting as merely a carrier of that data. Regarding claim 1, the claim is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 101 because the claimed invention is directed to non-statutory subject matter since the claims are directed toward image data file which is not any of the four eligible categories of invention. Dependent claims 4-12 fall together accordingly. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 13-18 are allowed. Claims 1 and 4-12 would be allowable if rewritten or amended to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 101 rejection, set forth in this Office action. Citation of Pertinent Prior Art The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure: Singfield et al. US 2004/0215659 A1 discloses separate storage of image files Camara et al. US 2004/0001631 A1 discloses metadata stored separately from an image file with which it is associated with Conclusion THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to STEFAN GADOMSKI whose telephone number is (571)270-5701. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday, 12-8PM EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jay Patel can be reached at 571-272-2988. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. STEFAN GADOMSKI Primary Examiner Art Unit 2485 /STEFAN GADOMSKI/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2485
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 26, 2024
Application Filed
Nov 19, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §101
Mar 12, 2026
Response Filed
Apr 04, 2026
Final Rejection — §101 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12602821
IMAGING DEVICE FOR CALCULATING THREE-DIMENSIONAL POSITION ON THE BASIS OF IMAGE CAPTURED BY VISUAL SENSOR
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12602771
IN SITU WAFER SEAL CHUCK DEFECTS IDENTIFICATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12596035
THERMAL IMAGING CAMERA DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12581104
MULTIVIEW ACQUISITION INFORMATION SUPPLEMENTAL ENHANCEMENT INFORMATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12573019
ELECTROPLATING CHAMBER LEAKAGE PLATING WARNING METHOD AND SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
76%
Grant Probability
83%
With Interview (+7.4%)
2y 7m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 412 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month