Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026
Application No. 18/897,148

A CHEMICAL VAPOR DEPOSITION METHOD USING AN ORGANOMANGANESE COMPOUND AS A STARTING MATERIAL

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Sep 26, 2024
Priority
Jun 17, 2019 — JP 2019-111737 +2 more
Examiner
COHEN, STEFANIE J
Art Unit
1715
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Tanaka Kiknzoku Kogyo K K
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
75%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
9m
Est. Remaining
78%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 75% — above average
75%
Career Allowance Rate
740 granted / 981 resolved
+10.4% vs TC avg
Minimal +2% lift
Without
With
+2.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
41 currently pending
Career history
999
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.6%
-38.4% vs TC avg
§103
59.6%
+19.6% vs TC avg
§102
10.9%
-29.1% vs TC avg
§112
20.0%
-20.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 981 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-6 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Mazyar et al (20130081335). Mazyar, paragraph 20 of the PGPUB, teaches “organometallic material” refers to a compound that contains at least one bond between a metal and carbon atom in an organic molecule, ion, or radical. In an embodiment, the organometallic material contains a metal (e.g., a transition metal) with metal-carbon single bonds or metal-carbon multiple bonds as well as a metal complexes with unsaturated molecules (metal-π-complexes). Examples of the organometallic material are compounds such as sandwich compounds. Such sandwich compounds include full sandwiches, half sandwiches, multidecker sandwiches such as triple decker sandwiches, and inverse sandwiches. The organometallic material can include more than one metal atom, and each metal atom can be different a metal element, the same metal element, or a combination thereof. Mazyar, paragraph 21 of the PGPUB, teaches the ligands of the organometallic material are the same or different. Examples of the ligand include isocyanide, η5-cyclopentadienyl or a combination comprising at least one of the foregoing. Mazyar, paragraph 23 of the PGPUB, teaches the ligands of the organometallic material can be substituted. As used herein “substituted” refers to a compound or radical substituted with at least one (e.g., 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 or more) substituents independently selected from a C1 to C20 alkyl, or a combination including at least one of the foregoing, instead of hydrogen, provided that the substituted atom's normal valence is not exceeded. Mazyar, paragraph 24 of the PGPUB, teaches the metal of the organometallic material can be an manganese. The structure of the organometallic material taught in the reference including the claimed structure would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains as suitable based on the teaching of the references above. Given that Mazyar discloses the organometallic material structure that overlaps the presently claimed raw material, it therefore would be obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, to use the organometallic material structure, which is both disclosed by Mazyar and encompassed within the scope of the present claims and thereby arrive at the claimed invention. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Dineen teaches cyanide and isocyanide metal complexes. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to STEFANIE J COHEN whose telephone number is (571)270-5836. The examiner can normally be reached 10am- 6pm M-F. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Coris Fung can be reached at (571) 270-5713. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /STEFANIE J COHEN/Examiner, Art Unit 1732 9/17/26
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 26, 2024
Application Filed
Sep 21, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12747361
Improved Non-Stick Coating
3y 10m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12729120
Compound
2y 11m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12722983
ACID TREATMENT OF LiNiO2 TO DECREASE GAMMA-NiOOH FORMATION
2y 8m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12722971
HYDROGEN PRODUCTION SYSTEM
2y 8m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12703796
STEROL IN ASPHALT ROOFING MATERIALS
4y 7m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
75%
Grant Probability
78%
With Interview (+2.5%)
2y 9m (~9m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 981 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month