Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/898,176

PHOTOELECTRIC CONVERSION DEVICE, PHOTOELECTRIC CONVERSION SYSTEM, AND MOVING BODY

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Sep 26, 2024
Priority
Sep 28, 2023 — JP 2023-168620
Examiner
HENN, TIMOTHY J
Art Unit
2639
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Canon Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
86%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
6m
Est. Remaining
97%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 86% — above average
86%
Career Allowance Rate
922 granted / 1075 resolved
+23.8% vs TC avg
Moderate +12% lift
Without
With
+11.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 4m
Avg Prosecution
24 currently pending
Career history
1094
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.3%
-37.7% vs TC avg
§103
61.2%
+21.2% vs TC avg
§102
5.0%
-35.0% vs TC avg
§112
18.0%
-22.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1075 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election of Species I, claims 1-7 and 13-16 in the reply filed on 15 June 2026 is acknowledged. Because applicant did not distinctly and specifically point out any supposed errors in the restriction requirement, the election has been treated as an election without traverse (MPEP § 818.01(a)). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 5 and 7 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention.[claims 5 and 7 – “a result output from the comparison circuit”] Claim 1 recites (emphasis added): 1. A device including a plurality of pixels, each of the plurality of pixels comprising: … a first switch arranged between the counting circuit and the first memory; and a comparison circuit connected to the counting circuit and the first memory, wherein the first switch switches between connection and disconnection between the counting circuit and the first memory according to a detection signal that is based on a signal output from the comparison circuit. Claim 5 recites (emphasis added): 5. The device according to claim 1, wherein each of the plurality of pixels further comprises a processing circuit connected to the comparison circuit, and wherein the detection signal is a signal which is output from the processing circuit according to a result output from the comparison circuit. Claim 7 recites (emphasis added): 7. The device according to claim 1, wherein, in a case where a result output from the comparison circuit is less than or equal to a predetermined threshold value, the first memory does not output a signal. It is unclear whether “a signal output from the comparison circuit” and “a result output from the comparison circuit” are to be considered the same signal, or whether they are two separate and distinct signals. Since only one signal line is present between the comparison circuit 214 and processing circuit 215 (see e.g. Figure 1) and the specification does not appear to describe two separate signals being output from the comparison circuit (e.g. Paragraph 0069), “a signal output from the comparison circuit” and “a result output from the comparison circuit” will be read as the same signal. Clarification is required. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-4, 6 and 13-16 are allowed. Claims 5 and 7 would be allowable if rewritten or amended to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action.[claims 1-7 and 13-16] Regarding claims 1-7 and 13-16, the prior art does not teach or reasonably suggest a device including a plurality of pixels, each of the plurality of pixels comprising: an avalanche photodiode; a counting circuit configured to count a number of photons which have entered the avalanche photodiode within an exposure period; a first memory connected to the counting circuit; a first switch arranged between the counting circuit and the first memory; and a comparison circuit connected to the counting circuit and the first memory, wherein the first switch switches between connection and disconnection between the counting circuit and the first memory according to a detection signal that is based on a signal output from the comparison circuit. While the prior art teaches similar systems variously including an avalanche photodiode, a counting circuit, a memory, a switch and a comparison circuit, the prior art does not teach or reasonably suggest the particular features recited in claims 1-7 and 13-16. For example, Mikajiri et al. ((S 2023/0217137 A1) teaches an image sensor comprising a plurality of pixels (Figure 1), each including an avalanche photodiode (Figure 3, 22), a counter (Figure 1, 342) and a comparison circuit (Figure 1, 344). However, Mikajiri does not teach a memory and a switch as required. Zhu et al. (US 2022/0155153 A1) teaches an image sensor including pixels each including a counter and comparison circuit (Figure 1, 11; Figure 24, 112h and 1133) which outputs a signal to cause a memory to store a value (Figure 1, WRen signal causing memory 13 to store value of time code generating unit 12). However, Zhu does not teach a switch which switches between connection and disconnection between the counting circuit and the first memory according to a detection signal that is based on a signal output from the comparison circuit as required. Numata (US 2022/0120610 A1) teaches an image sensor comprising pixels each including a counter (Figure 5, 211 or 212), a comparison circuit (Figure 5, 213) and a memory which stores information of a second counter (Figure 5, 212) in response to a comparison of a signal of a first counter exceeding a threshold (Figure 5, 213 comparing output of 211; Paragraph 0032). However, Numata does not teach a first switch or wherein the first switch switches between connection and disconnection between the counting circuit and the first memory according to a detection signal that is based on a signal output from the comparison circuit as required. Ryoki et al. (US 2021/0123802 A1) teaches an image sensor comprising pixels each including a counter, a first switch and a memory wherein the switch switches between a connection and disconnection between the counter and the memory (Figure 1, counter 114 connected to memory 116 via switch 115). However the switch switches in accordance with a control signal WRT from timing generator TG 102 and not a comparison circuit as required. Hikosaka (US 2023/0224609 A1) teaches a pixel including first and second counters which are connected by a switch (Figure 4, counters 32 and 34 connected by MUX SEL2), but does not teach a memory or comparison circuit as required. Kobayashi et al. (US 2019/0068908 A1 – Figure 1) and Suzuki et al. (US 2020/0252569 A1 – Figure 3) teach similar systems having pixel counters and memories, but also do not teach the particular requirements of the claims including a first switch, wherein the first switch switches between connection and disconnection between the counting circuit and the first memory according to a detection signal that is based on a signal output from the comparison circuit as required. Therefore, while the prior art teaches similar devices, the prior art does not teach or reasonably suggest the particular requirements of claims 1-7 and 13-16. However, the above 35 USC 112(b) rejections must be overcome before all claims can be considered allowable. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to TIMOTHY J HENN whose telephone number is (571)272-7310. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday ~10-6. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Twyler Haskins can be reached at (571) 272-7406. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Timothy J Henn/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2639
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 26, 2024
Application Filed
Jun 30, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12677063
IMAGING DEVICE
1y 10m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12666152
MULTIMODAL IMAGER SYSTEMS AND METHODS WITH STEERABLE FIELDS OF VIEW
2y 8m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12659576
MOTION-DETECTION SYSTEM AND MOTION-DETECTION METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12659579
TECHNIQUES FOR AN OVERHEAD CAMERA
2y 6m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12652479
IMAGE CAPTURING APPARATUS, METHOD FOR CONTROLLING THE SAME, AND STORAGE MEDIUM
2y 1m to grant Granted Jun 09, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
86%
Grant Probability
97%
With Interview (+11.5%)
2y 4m (~6m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1075 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month