Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/899,078

METHOD FOR TRACK CALIBRATION AND SYSTEM FOR TRACK CALIBRATION

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Sep 27, 2024
Priority
Sep 28, 2023 — EU 23306626.5
Examiner
AGARED, GABRIEL T
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Schneider Electric SE
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
83%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
9m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 83% — above average
83%
Career Allowance Rate
484 granted / 583 resolved
+23.0% vs TC avg
Strong +19% interview lift
Without
With
+19.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
30 currently pending
Career history
597
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.8%
-39.2% vs TC avg
§103
64.0%
+24.0% vs TC avg
§102
26.6%
-13.4% vs TC avg
§112
6.5%
-33.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 583 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . This action is in response to an application filed on 09/27/2024. Claims 1-9 are pending for examination. Drawings New corrected drawings in compliance with 37 CFR 1.121(d) are required in this application because the blank boxes in Fig.1B and Fig.2 need to have a written description in the drawings. Applicant is advised to employ the services of a competent patent draftsperson outside the Office, as the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office no longer prepares new drawings. The corrected drawings are required in reply to the Office action to avoid abandonment of the application. The requirement for corrected drawings will not be held in abeyance. Claim Objections Claim 2 recites the limitation "a linear motor" in line 2. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Claim 3 recites the limitation "a linear motor" in line 2. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Claim 7 recites the limitation "a linear motor system" in line 2, "a plurality of linear motors being arranged in a row and having a track” in line 4, “a segment boundary” in line 5, “a driving force” in line 6, “at least one position sensor” in line 7, “a control unit” in line 9, “a processing unit and a storage unit” in line 10-11. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitations in the claim. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 7 and 9 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claims 7 and 9 improperly combine two statutory classes, namely apparatus and method of using an apparatus. It is unclear to the examiner to determine if the claims should be treated as an apparatus claim (system claim) or a method claim as apparatus claims have different statutory requirements than that of method claims. It is unclear if the claim is infringed by the structure defined in claim 7 and 9 or when the method is performed (See MPEP 2173.05(p)) for track calibration of a linear motor system of claim 1. The suggestions would be to recite a system for track calibration for a linear motor system, the system comprising a control circuit to perform the method of claim 1 (re-written in independent form) or cancelling the system claims that depend on the method claim. Conclusion In view of the limitations the closest prior art as shown in the pto1449/Pto 896 including the prior works of the assignee/inventor does not explicitly describe or reasonably suggest or render obvious in combination with all the given limitations a method a method for track calibration of a linear motor system having at least one transport element, a plurality of linear motors being arranged in a row and having a track, wherein adjacent linear motors adjoin each other at a segment boundary and each of the linear motors is configured to apply a driving force for moving the transport element along the track and comprises at least one position sensor for detecting the position of the transport element as it travels along the track, and a control unit configured to control the linear motors to apply the driving force to the transport element, the control unit comprising a processing unit and a storage unit, the method comprising: controlling the linear motors to move the transport element along the track in a calibration run, determining position jumps at the segment boundaries of at least a part of the linear motors based on position feedback signals from the position sensors of the respective linear motor and its adjacent linear motors in the calibration run, generating an offset value and/or a gain value for at least the part of the linear motors from the determined position jumps, storing the offset values and/or the gain values in the storage unit as claimed and the subject matter of the claims appears to be allowable if the rejections under 35 U.S.C. 112 can be overcome. The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure: (US 2015/0028098 A1): A system for tracking position and identification of a moving element on a conveyor system having a track, the system including: a machine readable medium provided to one of the moving element or the track, wherein the machine readable medium is configured with at least two channels with a predetermined phase difference therebetween; a sensor provided to the other of the moving element or the track, wherein the sensor is configured to read the at least two channels; and a controller configured to receive data from the sensor and determine a position and/or identification of the moving element on the track based on the phase difference (see [Abstract]). US 20150268122 A1: A method for force calibration, force computation and force limitation of iron core linear motors by detecting interfering influences during the operating of the sled, wherein a winding current measured in the linear motor is used as value for these interfering forces, and the sled of the linear motor with all add-ons but without application forces over a desired travel area with a one-time calibration and, in the process, at least one interfering current value and at least one position value are recorded and stored by at least one current and position sensor per travel interval, wherein the interfering current value represents the sum of the interfering forces and, in the later application operation, the saved data record of interfering current and position values is interpolated and used as compensation value for computing the force-proportional application current of the linear motor (see [Abstract]). A linear motor system includes a discontinuous linear motor and motor control device. The discontinuous linear motor includes a mover and a plurality of individual motors spaced from each other along a movement path of the mover. Each of the individual motors functions as an armature on a primary side of one independent linear motor. A sensor, arranged to act as a linear scale, is disposed for each individual motor and detects a position of the mover. The motor control device includes a plurality of individual motor control units and a multiple unit controller to comprehensively control the individual motor control units. The individual motor control units control the individual motors disposed in curved path sections, and each of the individual motor control units includes a curved-line correspondence corrector to correct a detection value obtained from the sensor according to a relationship between a curved line of the path and a position of the sensor (see [Abstract]). Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to GABRIEL T AGARED whose telephone number is (571)270-1981. The examiner can normally be reached 8-5 (Mon- Thur). Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Eduardo Colon-Santana can be reached at (571) 272-2060. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /GABRIEL AGARED/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2837
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 27, 2024
Application Filed
Jun 17, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12683534
MOTOR CONTROL DEVICE AND IMAGE FORMING APPARATUS
3y 1m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12683527
SENSORLESS TRAPEZOIDAL MOTOR CONTROL
2y 9m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12675092
Frequency Domain Work Analysis of Machinery including Turbomachinery
3y 3m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12673764
MULTIPIVOT USER INTERFACE DEVICES AND RELATED VEHICLE SYSTEMS AND METHODS
2y 6m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12671354
SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR DETERMINING AN ANGULAR POSITION OF AN ELECTRIC MOTOR
2y 5m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
83%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+19.2%)
2y 6m (~9m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 583 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month