Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 17, 2026
Application No. 18/899,443

SWIVEL WORKING MACHINE

Non-Final OA §103§112
Filed
Sep 27, 2024
Priority
Mar 31, 2022 — JP 2022-060022 +4 more
Examiner
HANNON, TIMOTHY
Art Unit
3653
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Kubota Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
82%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
93%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 82% — above average
82%
Career Allowance Rate
420 granted / 515 resolved
+29.6% vs TC avg
Moderate +12% lift
Without
With
+11.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
1y 10m
Avg Prosecution
23 currently pending
Career history
527
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.3%
-37.7% vs TC avg
§103
32.0%
-8.0% vs TC avg
§102
30.6%
-9.4% vs TC avg
§112
32.1%
-7.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 515 resolved cases

Office Action

§103 §112
DETAILED ACTION This is on the merits of Application No. 18/899443, filed on 09/27/2024. Claims 1-20 are pending. The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS), submitted on 09/27/2024 and 04/04/2025 are in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statements have been considered by the examiner. Claim Objections Claims 1, 3, 13, 15, 16, and 20 are objected to because of the following informalities: Claim 1 line 11 states “guide cooling air” and should state --guide the cooling air--. Claim 3 line 2 states “cool a to-be-cooled device” and should state --cool the to-be-cooled device--. Claim 3 line 11 states “guide cooling air” and should state --guide the cooling air--. Claim 13 line 7 states “a heat exchanger” and should state --the heat exchanger--. Claim 13 line 9 states “a fan” and should state --the fan--. Claim 15 line 2 states “cool a to-be-cooled device” and should state --cool the to-be-cooled device--. Claim 16 states “a heat exchanger” and should state --the heat exchanger--. Claim 16 states “a fan” and should state --the fan--. Claim 16 states “a shroud” and should state --the shroud--. Claim 20 states “a cooler” and should state --the cooler--. Claim 20 states “a fan” and should state --the fan--. Claim 20 states “a heat exchanger” and should state --the heat exchanger--. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 3-7, 10, and 15 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 3 states “the fan includes a radiator fan… and an oil cooler fan”. It is unclear how a fan can include multiple fans. It is suggested applicant establish “at least one fan” in claim 1 instead of “a fan”. Claim 15 states “the fan includes a radiator fan… and an oil cooler fan”. It is unclear how a fan can include multiple fans. Claim 15 states “the filter includes a first filter... and a second filter”. The term “the filter” lacks antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. It is also unclear how a single filter can include multiple filters. Claim 15 states “the mount portion”. There is a lack of antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Is claim 15 meant to depend on 13 or 14 where the filter and mount portion are established? Claims 4-7 and 10 are rejected for being dependent on a rejected claim. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-2 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over JP 2011016437 to Miyazaki et al (cited in applicant’s IDS) in view of U.S. Patent App. Pub. No. 20090199792 to Kondou et al. Miyazaki discloses: (Claim 1) A working machine (Fig. 1) comprising: a base (1); a working device (2) provided on the base; an exterior cover (13) to define a space where one or more devices are provided on the base; an inspection door (7) openably and closably provided in the exterior cover and including an air exit portion (73a 73b); a cooler (9) including a fan (92) to discharge cooling air sucked from an interior of a machine body toward the air exit portion and a heat exchanger (90) to cool a to-be-cooled target (60) using cooling air sucked by the fan; and a shroud (91) to surround the fan and guide cooling air generated by the fan; wherein when the inspection door is in a closed state (Fig. 5a), a duct (through 94 and 70) to guide cooling air generated by the fan to the air exit portion is defined by an opening edge portion (93a) of the shroud making contact with a portion of the inspection door (70a) that surrounds the air exit portion. (Claim 2) wherein the inspection door includes, on an inner side thereof, an elastic body (95) provided at the portion that surrounds the air exit portion; and when the inspection door is in the closed state, the elastic body is elastically deformable upon contact with the opening edge portion of the shroud to seal a contact area between the inspection door and the opening edge portion of the shroud (see Figs. 4 and 5). Miyazaki does not disclose: (Claim 1) the base being a swivel base. Kondou teaches: (Claim 1) a swivel base (Fig. 1 element 2). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified, with a reasonable expectation of success, the structure of Miyazaki to have a swivel base, as taught by Kondou, as an obvious design choice to the type of working vehicle this air conditioner could be applied to. It is well-known in the art to have working vehicles have swivel bases. A person of ordinary skill in the art could have easily applied the well-known swivel base working vehicle to the working vehicle of Miyazaki and produce predictable results. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 3-7, 10 and 15 would be allowable if rewritten to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action and to include all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Claims 8-9, 11-14, and 16-20 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Hirakawa (US 2023/0203781) discloses a support structure for work vehicle and work vehicle. Kumagai (US 2018/0245310) discloses a construction machine. Pfohl et al (US 2015/0017901) discloses a vehicle with selectively reversible cooling fan. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to TIMOTHY HANNON whose telephone number is (571)270-1943. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday 10-6. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Ernesto Suarez can be reached at (571) 270-5565. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /TIMOTHY HANNON/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3655
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 27, 2024
Application Filed
Jul 13, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12703240
OFF-ROAD VEHICLE
2y 7m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12703202
INTERNAL CONNECTION OF A BICYCLE REAR HUB
2y 10m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12700639
VEHICULAR BATTERY PACK AND RELATED ASSEMBLY METHOD
2y 4m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12691766
Work Vehicle
2y 8m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12692909
CLUTCH DEVICE
11m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
82%
Grant Probability
93%
With Interview (+11.7%)
1y 10m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 515 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month