Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 14, 2026
Application No. 18/899,762

Jack

Non-Final OA §102§103§112
Filed
Sep 27, 2024
Priority
Sep 04, 2024 — CN 2024221609733
Examiner
HALL JR, TYRONE VINCENT
Art Unit
3723
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Qingdao Zhaorun Auto Parts Co. Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
77%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
8m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 77% — above average
77%
Career Allowance Rate
730 granted / 953 resolved
+6.6% vs TC avg
Strong +23% interview lift
Without
With
+23.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
27 currently pending
Career history
974
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.8%
-39.2% vs TC avg
§103
45.8%
+5.8% vs TC avg
§102
30.3%
-9.7% vs TC avg
§112
20.6%
-19.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 953 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Objections Claim 2 is objected to because of the following informalities: Claim 2 recites “wherein it has a rod body (6)”. The examiner suggests amending to --wherein it has a second rod body (6)--. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claim(s) 5 and 10 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claims 5 and 10 recite the limitation "the second rod body" in line 2. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. The second rod body is introduced in claim 2 which claim 3 is not dependent from. For the purposes of advancing prosecution, the examiner has construed the claims as best understood as being dependent upon claim 2 which recites the limitation of a second rod body which would provide proper antecedent basis for the claim limitation. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1, 3-4 and 9 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Chen US 2011/0006273. PNG media_image1.png 320 482 media_image1.png Greyscale Chen discloses a jack comprising a first upper arm (230a upper), a second upper arm (230b upper), a first lower arm (230a lower), a second lower arm (230b lower) and a first rod body (240), wherein it is further provided with: a first pin shaft (232a) - the first upper arm (230a) and first lower arm (230a) are rotatably connected by the first pin shaft (232a); a second pin shaft (232b) - the second pin shaft (232b) has an internal chamber, the second upper arm (230b) and second lower arm (230b) are rotatably connected by the second pin shaft (232b), and the first rod body (240) is rotatably connected to the second pin shaft (232b); a locking component (250) - the locking component (2505) is set in the second pin shaft (232b) and can be connected (via 253) to the first rod body (240) through threads (fig. 7b) or to the first rod body (240) through sliding. As for claim 3, Chen discloses wherein the locking component (250) has a first locking part (252a) and a second locking part (252b); the first rod body (240) is set between the first locking part (252a) and second locking part (252b), and the ends of the first locking part (252a) and second locking part (252b) near the first rod body (240) have threads (253) matching with those of the first rod body (240). As for claim 4, Chen discloses wherein the first locking part (252a) is locked or fixedly connected to the second pin shaft (232b), and the second locking part (252b) is locked to the second pin shaft (232b). PNG media_image2.png 325 491 media_image2.png Greyscale As for claim 9, Chen discloses wherein the jack is further provided with a jack-up head (not labeled, see annotated figure above) and a fitting body (220); the first upper arm (230a) and second upper arm (230b) are both rotatably connected to the jack-up head, and the fitting body is fixedly connected to the jack-up head. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 2 and 7 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Chen US 2011/0006273 in view of Tsang YS 2014/0374680. PNG media_image3.png 426 752 media_image3.png Greyscale As for claim 2, Chen discloses all the limitations as recited above but does not specify a second rod body, the second rod body is rotatably connected to the first pin shaft and second pin shaft, and the locking component can be connected to the second rod body in a contact manner. However, Tsang teaches a jack having first and second arms (31, 32), a first rod body (7), and a first and second pin shaft (40, 50) wherein a second rod body (8) is rotatably connected to the first pin shaft (40) and the second pin shaft (50). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date, to modify the jack of Chen to include a second rod body connected to the first and second pin shafts and locking component as taught by Tsang in order to provide an additional means for linearly guiding and stabilizing the jack as it is actuated from a raised and lowered position. As for claim 7, the modified Chen teaches wherein the first pin shaft (232a) has a first through hole (not shown but formed to allow passage of rod 240, ¶0020), the second pin shaft (232b) has a second through hole (not shown but formed to allow passage of rod 240, ¶0020), and the second rod body (as taught by Tsang, 8) passes through the first through hole (not shown but formed to allow passage of rod 240, ¶0020) and second through hole (not shown but formed to allow passage of rod 240, ¶0020). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 6 and 8 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Claims 5 and 10 would be allowable if rewritten to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action and to include all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: The claims recite specific structural limitations to the locking component (claims 6 and 8) and the second rod body (claims 5 and 10) which the closest prior art of record fails to disclose, teach or suggest alone or in combination. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to TYRONE V HALL JR whose telephone number is (571)270-5948. The examiner can normally be reached Mon.-Fri. 7:30am-3:30pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Monica Carter can be reached at (571) 272-4475. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /TYRONE V HALL JR/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3723
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 27, 2024
Application Filed
Jul 23, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12702218
Tethering Point System
3y 11m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12686107
Hammer with Linearly Adjustable Claw
2y 12m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Patent 12690417
WAFER PLACEMENT TABLE
2y 5m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Patent 12684729
PUSHING AUXILIARY
3y 11m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12667921
AUTOMATICALLY REPLACEABLE FIXTURE PLATE
3y 3m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
77%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+23.3%)
2y 6m (~8m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 953 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month