Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/899,909

CONNECTING WI-FI-ENABLED DEVICE TO NON-TERRESTRIAL SATELLITE CONSTELLATIONS

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Sep 27, 2024
Examiner
POLLACK, MELVIN H
Art Unit
2445
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Dell Products L.P.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
86%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 1m
Est. Remaining
91%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 86% — above average
86%
Career Allowance Rate
639 granted / 743 resolved
+28.0% vs TC avg
Minimal +5% lift
Without
With
+5.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 1m
Avg Prosecution
16 currently pending
Career history
754
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
9.7%
-30.3% vs TC avg
§103
54.3%
+14.3% vs TC avg
§102
23.7%
-16.3% vs TC avg
§112
10.6%
-29.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 743 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1-20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Sadri et al. (2024/0,223,266) in view of Ashrafi (11,152,991). For claims 1, 10, 14, Sadri teaches a system (abstract; background, summary and claims), comprising: a Layer-1 (Para 50) physical interface (L1-PHY) (Para 47) transcoder (Paras 37-40) that: obtains uplink wireless fidelity (Wi-Fi) (Paras 36-37) communication signals (Para 25; wireless) from a Wi-Fi- enabled device (Para 26), converts the uplink Wi-Fi communication signals to non-terrestrial (Para 23) uplink (Paras 3-4) communication signals for a satellite (Para 24), outputs the non-terrestrial uplink communication signals for redirection to the satellite via the surface (Para 23, 32), obtains non-terrestrial downlink communication signals from the satellite, as redirected to the L1-PHY transcoder via the surface (Paras 33-35), converts the non-terrestrial downlink communication signals to downlink Wi-Fi communication signals for the Wi-Fi-enabled device (Paras 43-45), and outputs the downlink Wi-Fi communication signals to the Wi-Fi-enabled device (Para 45). Sadri does not expressly disclose a metasurface; and downlink signals redirected via the metasurface. Ashrafi teaches a method and system (abstract) in the relevant art (background, summary and claims) that includes this limitation (Figs 20A and 20B). At the time of filing, one of ordinary skill in the art would have added Ashrafi in order to provide improvements to the NTN system (background). For claim 2, Sadri teaches wherein the metasurface is incorporated into the L1-PHY transcoder (Para 36). For claim 3, Sadri teaches that the metasurface comprises a device externally radio frequency coupled to the L1-PHY transcoder (Para 61). For claim 4, Sadri teaches wherein the L1-PHY transcoder performs at least one of: filtering (N/A), amplification (Para 24), or frequency conversion (Paras 38-39) on the uplink Wi-Fi communication signals (Paras 40-41). For claim 5, Sadri teaches wherein the uplink Wi-Fi communication signals comprise first encoded packet data (Paras 41-42), and wherein the L1-PHY transcoder converts the uplink Wi-Fi communication signals to the non-terrestrial uplink communication signals based on decoding the first encoded packet data into decoded packet data (Paras 43-44), and encoding the decoded packet data into second encoded packet data. (Para 45) For claim 6, 11, 12, 15, 16, Sadri teaches wherein the L1-PHY transcoder performs at least one of: equalization (N/A), demodulation (Paras 52-55), or forward-error-correction decoding (N/A), to extract the first encoded packet data from the uplink Wi-Fi communication signals (Paras 43-45). For claim 7, Sadri teaches wherein the L1-PHY transcoder performs at least one of: filtering (N/A), amplification (Para 24), or frequency conversion (Paras 38-39) on the uplink Wi-Fi communication signals (Paras 40-41). For claims 8, 18, Sadri teaches that the non-terrestrial downlink communication signals comprise first encoded packet data (Paras 41-42), and wherein the L1-PHY transcoder converts the non-terrestrial downlink communication signals to the downlink Wi-Fi communication signals based on decoding the first encoded packet data into decoded packet data (Paras 43-44), and encoding the decoded packet data into second encoded packet data (Para 45). For claims 9, 11, 13, 15, 17, 19, Sadri teaches wherein the L1-PHY transcoder performs at least one of: filtering (N/A), amplification (Para 24), or frequency conversion (Paras 38-39), to extract the first encoded packet data from the non-terrestrial downlink communication signals (Paras 40-41). For claim 20, Sadri teaches that the first packet converter decodes the first packet data based on digital video broadcasting logic blocks (Para 5), and wherein the second packet converter decodes the third packet data based on Wi-Fi logic blocks (Paras 54-59). Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MELVIN H POLLACK whose telephone number is (571)272-3887. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 8:30-5:00. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Oscar Louie can be reached at (571)270-1684. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /MELVIN H POLLACK/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2445
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 27, 2024
Application Filed
Sep 17, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12750869
Multicast Message that includes Responses to Radio Resource Requests of Wireless Devices of a Multicast Group
2y 6m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12744710
SYSTEM IN WHICH PLURAL CONTROLLED DEVICES AND MAIN CONTROL DEVICE ARE CONNECTED VIA NETWORK
3y 0m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12739718
PDCCH MONITORING METHOD AND DEVICES
2y 8m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12726855
MULTI-LINK OPERATION TRANSMIT ARCHITECTURE FOR DYNAMIC MAPPING OF TRANSMIT QUEUES TO LINKS
3y 11m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12719743
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR PREVENTING ARC ON NETWORK CABLE DISCONNECT
3y 1m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
86%
Grant Probability
91%
With Interview (+5.0%)
3y 1m (~1y 1m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 743 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month