Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/900,019

METHOD FOR RESOURCE ALLOCATION ON SHARED SPECTRUM AND DEVICE THEREOF

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Sep 27, 2024
Priority
Nov 04, 2022 — continuation of PCTCN2022130064
Examiner
LY, ANH VU H
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
ZTE Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
89%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
6m
Est. Remaining
89%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 89% — above average
89%
Career Allowance Rate
954 granted / 1069 resolved
+29.2% vs TC avg
Minimal -0% lift
Without
With
+-0.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
32 currently pending
Career history
1089
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
5.9%
-34.1% vs TC avg
§103
36.6%
-3.4% vs TC avg
§102
30.2%
-9.8% vs TC avg
§112
14.4%
-25.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1069 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-15 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Han et al (US 2025/0274952 A1). Regarding claim 1, Han discloses a wireless communication method for use in a wireless terminal (Fig. 4), the wireless communication method comprising: determining a sidelink channel access priority for a sidelink transmission in an unlicensed carrier based on a channel access priority class value (Fig. 4, 93rd, 103rd – 105th paragraphs, sidelink DRB, SL SRB, and SL MAC CE transmission priority on unlicensed spectrum is determined based on CAPC), and performing a listen-before-talk (LBT) procedure in the unlicensed carrier for the sidelink transmission based on the sidelink channel access priority (73rd paragraph, LBT performed for sidelink transmission), wherein the channel access priority class value is selected from a plurality of channel access priority class values associated with a plurality of quality of service (QoS) files of the sidelink transmission (57th paragraph and Table 1, a CAPC can be selected from a plurality of CPACs associated with 5QIs for different sidelink transmission). Regarding claims 2, 7, and 12, Han discloses that wherein the plurality of channel access priority class values is corresponding to a plurality of PC5 QoS identifier (PQI) values (73rd paragraph and Table 3, CAPCs vs PQIs) or a plurality of packet delay budget values determined for the plurality of QoS files (73rd paragraph and Table 3, CAPCs vs Delay values). Regarding claims 3, 8, and 13, Han discloses that wherein the selected channel access priority class value is the lowest or the highest channel access priority class value in the plurality of channel access priority class values (58th paragraph and Table 2, CAPCs include a lowest priority and a highest priority). Regarding claims 4, 9, and 14, Han discloses that wherein the selected channel access priority class value is a default channel access priority class value for a QoS flow corresponding to a non-standardized PC5 QoS identifier (PQI), and wherein the non-standardized PQI has no corresponding channel access priority class value or is mapped to a default data radio bearer (57th paragraph, a non-standardized 5QI should use a suitable CAPC based on the table, i.e., CAPC used for a non-standardized 5QI should be a CAPC of the standardized 5QIs which best matches the traffic class or QoS characteristics, of the non-standardize 5QI. Herein, non-standardized 5QI has no corresponding CAPC value). Regarding claims 5, 10, and 15, Han discloses that wherein the default value is received from a wireless network node or preconfigured (57th paragraph, a non-standardized 5QI should use a suitable CAPC based on the table, i.e., CAPC used for a non-standardized 5QI should be a CAPC of the standardized 5QIs which best matches the traffic class or QoS characteristics, of the non-standardize 5QI. Herein, the suitable CAPC is a preconfigured). Regarding claim 6, Han discloses a wireless terminal (Fig. 2), comprising: a processor (Fig. 2, processor 202), configure to: determine a sidelink channel access priority for a sidelink transmission in an unlicensed carrier based on a channel access priority class value (Fig. 4, 93rd, and 103rd – 105th paragraphs, sidelink DRB, SL SRB, and SL MAC CE transmission priority on unlicensed spectrum is determined based on CAPC), and perform a listen-before-talk (LBT) procedure in the unlicensed carrier for the sidelink transmission based on the sidelink channel access priority (73rd paragraph, LBT performed for sidelink transmission), wherein the channel access priority class value is selected from a plurality of channel access priority class values associated with a plurality of quality of service (QoS) files of the sidelink transmission (57th paragraph and Table 1, a CAPC can be selected from a plurality of CPACs associated with 5QIs for different sidelink transmission). Regarding claim 11, Han discloses a non-transitory computer readable program product comprising a computer-readable program medium code stored thereupon (Fig. 2, memory 204 storing program code), the code, when executed by at least one processor (Fig. 2, processor 202 executing the program code), causing the at least one processor to implement a wireless communication method comprising: determining a sidelink channel access priority for a sidelink transmission in an unlicensed carrier based on a channel access priority class value (Fig. 4, 93rd, and 103rd – 105th paragraphs, sidelink DRB, SL SRB, and SL MAC CE transmission priority on unlicensed spectrum is determined based on CAPC), and performing a listen-before-talk (LBT) procedure in the unlicensed carrier for the sidelink transmission based on the sidelink channel access priority (73rd paragraph, LBT performed for sidelink transmission), wherein the channel access priority class value is selected from a plurality of channel access priority class values associated with a plurality of quality of service (QoS) files of the sidelink transmission (57th paragraph and Table 1, a CAPC can be selected from a plurality of CPACs associated with 5QIs for different SL transmission). Conclusion Li et al (US 2024/0064553 A1), same field of endeavor, discloses mapping QoS parameter to CAPC (Figs. 6-12). Li et al (US 2026/0164294 A1), same field of endeavor, discloses SL DRB and CAPC configuration (Figs. 3-6). Golitschek Edler von Elbwart et al (US 2026/0067947 A1), generally related, discloses CAPC associated with a sidelink transmission (Fig. 6). Talarico et al (US 2025/0247858 A1), same field of endeavor, discloses mapping between CAPCs and PQIs (Figs. 11-13). Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ANH VU H LY whose telephone number is (571)272-3175. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 8am-5pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Nick Jensen can be reached at 571-270-5443. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. ANH VU H. LY Primary Examiner Art Unit 2472 /ANH VU H LY/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2472
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 27, 2024
Application Filed
Sep 03, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12750784
SIGNALING OPTIMIZATIONS FOR WIRELESS DEVICES OPERATING ON HARVESTED ENERGY
2y 9m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12750279
METHODS, ARCHITECTURES, APPARATUSES AND SYSTEMS FOR PROGRAMMABLE INTERFACE FOR SERVICE COMMUNICATION PROXY
2y 4m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12739070
METHODS AND APPARATUS TO PERFORM SHORT-RANGE WIRELESS COMMUNICATION
2y 11m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12732308
RADIO NETWORK NODE, USER EQUIPMENT AND METHODS FOR MULTI-LEVEL ACK/NACK FEEDBACK
3y 1m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12706775
INTERNET PROTOCOL COMMUNICATIONS OVER ALTERNATIVE FREQUENCY BAND OF EXISTING MIL-STD-1553 BUS
2y 9m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
89%
Grant Probability
89%
With Interview (-0.1%)
2y 6m (~6m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1069 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month