Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/900,611

ENDOSCOPE

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Sep 27, 2024
Examiner
NEAL, TIMOTHY JAY
Art Unit
3795
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Fujifilm Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
78%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 11m
To Grant
91%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 78% — above average
78%
Career Allow Rate
608 granted / 784 resolved
+7.6% vs TC avg
Moderate +13% lift
Without
With
+13.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 11m
Avg Prosecution
31 currently pending
Career history
815
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.9%
-39.1% vs TC avg
§103
43.7%
+3.7% vs TC avg
§102
22.6%
-17.4% vs TC avg
§112
27.4%
-12.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 784 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1 and 4-9 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102a1/a2 as being anticipated by Komi (US 5,343,853). Regarding Claim 1, Komi discloses: An endoscope comprising: a distal end part (10) formed with an elevator housing portion (distal housing shown in Fig. 1); an elevator (16) disposed in the elevator housing portion (shown in Fig. 1); and a treatment tool insertion path (channel 13) communicating with a treatment tool outlet that is open to the elevator housing portion (shown in Fig. 1 showing 13 leading to the elevator housing), wherein the treatment tool insertion path has a diameter-enlarged portion that enlarges in diameter toward the treatment tool outlet (see the distal portion of 13 that includes an unnumbered funnel opening to the tool outlet). Regarding Claim 4, Komi further discloses a wire insertion path (the path of wire 18; see Fig. 3) into which an operation wire (18) is inserted, wherein the elevator is rotatably disposed in the elevator housing portion, and the operation wire is connected to the elevator (see Fig. 1 showing 18 connected to 16). Regarding Claim 5, Komi further discloses wherein the elevator housing portion is provided with an opening portion that has a component (shown as R in Fig. 1) in a direction orthogonal to an opening direction of the treatment tool outlet and that is open in a first direction, and in a cross section of the diameter-enlarged portion along a plane determined by the opening direction of the treatment tool outlet and the first direction, an extension line of a bottom portion of the diameter-enlarged portion on a second direction side opposite to the first direction is located on the second direction side with respect to a rotation shaft of the elevator (see Fig. 1 and marked up drawing below with the extension line opposite the opening). PNG media_image1.png 352 556 media_image1.png Greyscale Regarding Claim 6, Komi further discloses wherein the elevator housing portion is provided with an opening portion that has a component (shown as R in Fig. 1) in a direction orthogonal to an opening direction of the treatment tool outlet and that is open in a first direction, the elevator has a treatment tool guide surface that guides a treatment tool led out from the treatment tool outlet toward the opening portion, and in a cross section of the treatment tool insertion path along a plane determined by the opening direction of the treatment tool outlet and the first direction, an extension line of a bottom portion of a connecting portion, which is connected to a base end side of the diameter-enlarged portion, in the treatment tool insertion path on a second direction side opposite to the first direction intersects the treatment tool guide surface (see Fig. 1 and marked up drawing below with the extension line opposite the opening). PNG media_image2.png 352 556 media_image2.png Greyscale Regarding Claim 7, Komi further discloses wherein the treatment tool outlet also serves as a liquid supply port for supplying a liquid for cleaning or disinfection to the elevator (functional language; the outlet can receive a tool as shown in Fig. 1 such that liquid can also be supplied through the outlet). Regarding Claim 8, Komi further discloses wherein the elevator has a liquid guide surface (19) that guides the liquid supplied to the elevator in a direction in which a rotation shaft of the elevator is provided (the claim is functional in nature, if liquid is applied to the guide surface 19, because the surface has multiple arcuate portions 19A-19D, 19A or 19C will direct fluid toward the rotation shaft of the elevator at least in some orientations (while the fluid would be directed toward the rotation shaft as seen in Fig. 6, the Examiner also notes that the liquid can be directed along the surface via gravity in at least some spatial orientations such that the fluid will flow toward the shaft)). Regarding Claim 9, Komi further discloses wherein the liquid guide surface is provided at a position facing the treatment tool outlet in a case in which the elevator is in an elevated state (shown in Fig. 6). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 2-3 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Komi (US 5,343,853) in view of Matsuno (US 5,562,600). Komi discloses the invention substantially as claimed as stated above. Regarding Claim 2, Komi does not explicitly disclose a wire insertion path into which an operation wire is inserted, wherein the wire insertion path and the elevator are disposed on sides opposite to each other across a partition wall, the partition wall is provided with a through-hole penetrating a space between a side where the wire insertion path is disposed and a side where the elevator is disposed, and a power transmitting member that is inserted into the through-hole and that has one end connected to the elevator and the other end connected to the operation wire is provided. Matsuno teaches such a configuration with a control wire (22) on the opposite side of wall (15) relative to elevator (5). The wire connects to the elevator by means of driving shaft 13 (See Figs. 3-6) that extends through the wall 15 (see Fig. 3, for example). This configuration isolates the control wire from the tool guide member to remove the possibility of the tool getting caught on the control wire. Therefore, it would have been obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify Komi’s device to include Matsuno’s wire and control lever configuration. Such a modification prevents the tool from getting caught on the control wire. Regarding Claim 3, Komi as modified further discloses wherein the power transmitting member includes a rotation shaft (Matsuno – 13) to which the elevator is connected on one end side, and an elevating lever (Matsuno – 21) that is provided on the other end side of the rotation shaft and to which the operation wire is connected (see Fig. 6, for example of Matsuno). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to TIMOTHY JAY NEAL whose telephone number is (313)446-4878. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Fri 7:30-5:30. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Anhtuan Nguyen can be reached at (571)272-4963. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /TIMOTHY J NEAL/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3795
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 27, 2024
Application Filed
Feb 25, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12593966
ENDOLUMINAL TRANSHEPATIC ACCESS PROCEDURE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12593963
IMAGING SYSTEM AND LAPROSCOPE FOR IMAGING AN OBJECT
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12588956
TRAJECTORY TRACKING FOR MEDICAL DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12588805
System for Telescoping Members Through an Elongate Tube
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12582296
INTERNAL SEAL FOR BIOPSY CAP
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
78%
Grant Probability
91%
With Interview (+13.2%)
2y 11m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 784 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month