Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/900,999

COMMUNICATION SYSTEM, COMMUNICATION DEVICE AND COMMUNICATION TERMINAL DEVICE

Non-Final OA §101§DP
Filed
Sep 30, 2024
Examiner
MOORTHY, ARAVIND K
Art Unit
2407
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Maxell, Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
84%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 1m
To Grant
97%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 84% — above average
84%
Career Allow Rate
964 granted / 1144 resolved
+26.3% vs TC avg
Moderate +12% lift
Without
With
+12.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 1m
Avg Prosecution
15 currently pending
Career history
1159
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
10.9%
-29.1% vs TC avg
§103
38.6%
-1.4% vs TC avg
§102
24.3%
-15.7% vs TC avg
§112
13.8%
-26.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1144 resolved cases

Office Action

§101 §DP
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . 1. This is in response to the communications filed on 30 September 2024. 2. Claim 1 is pending in the application. 3. Claim 1 has been rejected. Information Disclosure Statement 4. The examiner has considered the information disclosure statement (IDS) filed on 30 September 2024. Specification 5. The title of the invention is not descriptive. A new title is required that is clearly indicative of the invention to which the claims are directed. Double Patenting A rejection based on double patenting of the “same invention” type finds its support in the language of 35 U.S.C. 101 which states that “whoever invents or discovers any new and useful process... may obtain a patent therefor...” (Emphasis added). Thus, the term “same invention,” in this context, means an invention drawn to identical subject matter. See Miller v. Eagle Mfg. Co., 151 U.S. 186 (1894); In re Vogel, 422 F.2d 438, 164 USPQ 619 (CCPA 1970); In re Ockert, 245 F.2d 467, 114 USPQ 330 (CCPA 1957). A statutory type (35 U.S.C. 101) double patenting rejection can be overcome by canceling or amending the claims that are directed to the same invention so they are no longer coextensive in scope. The filing of a terminal disclaimer cannot overcome a double patenting rejection based upon 35 U.S.C. 101. 6. Claim 1 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 101 as claiming the same invention as that of claim 1 of prior U.S. Patent No. 12,137,344 B2. This is a statutory double patenting rejection. 18/900,999 U.S. Patent No. 12,137,344 B2 Claim 1. A video processing apparatus comprising: a communication interface; a display interface; and a controller, wherein the communication interface is configured to communicate with a first communication terminal and communicate with a second communication terminal, wherein the display interface is configured to output data; wherein the controller is configured to control the communication interface and the display interface, wherein, if having permission to communicate from the first communication terminal for communicating with the video processing apparatus and the second communication terminal, the controller is configured to control the communication interface to communicate with the second communication terminal, wherein the controller is configured to control the display interface to output the data received from the second communication terminal, wherein the controller is configured to control the display interface to control how to display the data received from the second communication terminal while maintaining a connection between the video processing apparatus and the second communication terminal in accordance with a command to remotely control a display operation on the video processing apparatus connected with the first communication terminal, wherein the controller is configured to control the communication interface to transmit information to the first communication terminal at predetermined time intervals for confirming whether to maintain or terminate the permission for the second communication terminal, while maintaining the connection between the video processing apparatus and the second communication terminal, and wherein the controller is configured to control the communication interface to terminate the connection with the second communication terminal in accordance with the information to terminate permission received from the first communication terminal. Claim 1. A video processing apparatus comprising: a communication interface; a display interface; and a controller, wherein the communication interface is configured to communicate with a first communication terminal and communicate with a second communication terminal, wherein the display interface is configured to output data; wherein the controller is configured to control the communication interface and the display interface, wherein, if having permission to communicate from the first communication terminal for communicating with the video processing apparatus and the second communication terminal, the controller is configured to control the communication interface to communicate with the second communication terminal, wherein the controller is configured to control the display interface to output the data received from the second communication terminal, wherein the controller is configured to control the display interface to control how to display the data received from the second communication terminal while maintaining a connection between the video processing apparatus and the second communication terminal in accordance with a command to remotely control a display operation on the video processing apparatus connected with the first communication terminal, wherein the controller is configured to control the communication interface to transmit information to the first communication terminal at predetermined time intervals for confirming whether to maintain or terminate the permission for the second communication terminal, while maintaining the connection between the video processing apparatus and the second communication terminal, and wherein the controller is configured to control the communication interface to terminate the connection with the second communication terminal in accordance with the information to terminate permission received from the first communication terminal. Relevant Prior Art 7. The following references have been considered relevant by the examiner: A. Yang US 2014/0181515 A1 directed to Wireless Local Area Network (WLAN) authentication, and more particularly, to communication systems for integrating WLAN technology and cellular network technology, and WLAN authentication methods thereof [0003]. B. Pummill et al US 2006/0276139 A1 directed to a method for managing UMA communications within a local area network and a network controller [abstract]. C. Zhang US 2005/0154895 A1 directed to networking and, more particularly, method for transitive Authentication Authorization and Accounting (AAA) in the interworking between access networks [0002]. Conclusion 8. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ARAVIND K MOORTHY whose telephone number is (571)272-3793. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 4:30-3:00. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Catherine Thiaw can be reached at 571-270-1138. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ARAVIND K MOORTHY/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2407
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 30, 2024
Application Filed
Jan 13, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §101, §DP (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12596770
SECURE FILE SHARING SYSTEM AND METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12591645
Characterization of a user via association of a sound with an interactive element
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12585760
Monitoring for Security Threats in a Container System
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12587516
SECURE RDMA FOR LOW-LATENCY REAL-TIME APPLICATIONS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12587517
PROOF-OF-WORK CHALLENGE TO TRANSMIT DATA TO A NON-AUTHENTICATED GATEWAY
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
84%
Grant Probability
97%
With Interview (+12.3%)
3y 1m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1144 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month