Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/901,916

ULTRA-WIDEBAND ANTENNA ARRAY AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Sep 30, 2024
Priority
Apr 01, 2022 — CN 202210347408.0 +1 more
Examiner
DUONG, DIEU HIEN
Art Unit
2845
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Vivo Mobile Communication Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
78%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
10m
Est. Remaining
95%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 78% — above average
78%
Career Allowance Rate
817 granted / 1044 resolved
+10.3% vs TC avg
Strong +17% interview lift
Without
With
+16.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
24 currently pending
Career history
1064
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
§103
83.4%
+43.4% vs TC avg
§102
8.8%
-31.2% vs TC avg
§112
2.5%
-37.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1044 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant's election with traverse of claims 1-5, 8-14 and 17-18 in the reply filed on 04/01/26 is acknowledged. However, applicant did not distinctly and specifically point out the supposed errors in the restriction requirement. These inventions are independent or distinct and they are mutually exclusive and have acquired a separate status in the art due to their recognized divergent subject matter that requires a different field of search (for example, searching different classes/subclasses or electronic resources, or employing different search queries). In view of this reason, a restriction imposed is clearly proper. Currently, claims 6-7, 15-16 and 19-20 are withdrawn in this action. The requirement is still deemed proper and is therefore made FINAL. Drawings Figure 1 should be designated by a legend such as --Prior Art-- because only that which is old is illustrated. See MPEP § 608.02(g). Corrected drawings in compliance with 37 CFR 1.121(d) are required in reply to the Office action to avoid abandonment of the application. The replacement sheet(s) should be labeled “Replacement Sheet” in the page header (as per 37 CFR 1.84(c)) so as not to obstruct any portion of the drawing figures. If the changes are not accepted by the examiner, the applicant will be notified and informed of any required corrective action in the next Office action. The objection to the drawings will not be held in abeyance. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-2 and 10-11 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Yoo et al (US 2022/0393367). Regarding claims 1 and 10, Yoo discloses in Figures 3, 8A, an electronic device comprising an ultra-wideband antenna array, wherein the ultra-wideband antenna array comprises a first antenna unit (316), a second antenna unit (314), and a third antenna unit (312), wherein a first distance and a second distance are less than a third distance (316-314), wherein the first distance (312-316) is a distance between the first antenna unit (316) and the third antenna unit (312), the second distance (312-316) is a distance between the second antenna unit (314) and the third antenna unit (312), and the third distance (316-314) is a distance between the first antenna unit (316) and the second antenna unit (314); and phase centers of the first antenna unit (316), the second antenna unit (314), and the third antenna unit (312) are deviated from geometric centers (see Fig. 8A and par. 0142). Regarding claims 2 and 11, as applied to claims 1 and 10, Yoo discloses in Figure 11, wherein a phase center distance (D5) between at least two of the first antenna unit (316), the second antenna unit (314), and the third antenna unit (312) is greater than a geometric center distance (D1). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 9 and 18 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Yoo et al (US 20220393367) in view of Baheti et al (US 2018/0219272). Regarding claims 9 and 18, Yoo discloses every feature of claimed invention as expressly recited in claims 1 and 10, except for a metallic ground disposed between two adjacent antenna units of the first antenna unit, the second antenna unit, and the third antenna unit. Baheti discloses in Figure 1A, a metallic ground (12) disposed between two adjacent antenna units of the first antenna unit (40), the second antenna unit (40), and the third antenna unit (40) It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of claimed invention to modify the antenna units of Yoo with the antenna units having a metallic ground disposed between two adjacent antenna units as taught by Baheti to isolate the antenna units from each other. Therefore, to employ having the metallic ground as claimed invention would have been obvious to person skill in the art. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 3-5, 8, 12-14 and 17 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to DIEU HIEN T DUONG whose telephone number is (571)272-8980. The examiner can normally be reached 8:00am-4:00pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, DIMARY CRUZ LOPEZ can be reached at 571-270-7893. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /DIEU HIEN T DUONG/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2845
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 30, 2024
Application Filed
Jun 03, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12683281
ANTENNA DEVICE
2y 6m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12665307
CIRCULARLY POLARIZED ANTENNA ELEMENT WITH SEQUENTIALLY ROTATED FEEDING
2y 7m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12658560
Resonant Cavity Antenna and Electronic Device
3y 0m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12658584
ANTENNA MODULE ARRANGED IN VEHICLE
1y 1m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12646826
ELECTRONIC PACKAGE AND MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREOF
3y 5m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
78%
Grant Probability
95%
With Interview (+16.9%)
2y 7m (~10m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1044 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month