Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/902,258

METHODS AND APPARATUS TO IDENTIFY STREAMING MEDIA SOURCES

Non-Final OA §DP
Filed
Sep 30, 2024
Examiner
KURIEN, CHRISTEN A
Art Unit
2421
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
The Nielsen Company (US), LLC
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
56%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 6m
To Grant
84%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 56% of resolved cases
56%
Career Allow Rate
249 granted / 446 resolved
-2.2% vs TC avg
Strong +28% interview lift
Without
With
+27.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 6m
Avg Prosecution
16 currently pending
Career history
462
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
9.7%
-30.3% vs TC avg
§103
66.9%
+26.9% vs TC avg
§102
13.8%
-26.2% vs TC avg
§112
3.8%
-36.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 446 resolved cases

Office Action

§DP
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Double Patenting The nonstatutory double patenting rejection is based on a judicially created doctrine grounded in public policy (a policy reflected in the statute) so as to prevent the unjustified or improper timewise extension of the “right to exclude” granted by a patent and to prevent possible harassment by multiple assignees. A nonstatutory double patenting rejection is appropriate where the conflicting claims are not identical, but at least one examined application claim is not patentably distinct from the reference claim(s) because the examined application claim is either anticipated by, or would have been obvious over, the reference claim(s). See, e.g., In re Berg, 140 F.3d 1428, 46 USPQ2d 1226 (Fed. Cir. 1998); In re Goodman, 11 F.3d 1046, 29 USPQ2d 2010 (Fed. Cir. 1993); In re Longi, 759 F.2d 887, 225 USPQ 645 (Fed. Cir. 1985); In re Van Ornum, 686 F.2d 937, 214 USPQ 761 (CCPA 1982); In re Vogel, 422 F.2d 438, 164 USPQ 619 (CCPA 1970); In re Thorington, 418 F.2d 528, 163 USPQ 644 (CCPA 1969). A timely filed terminal disclaimer in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(c) or 1.321(d) may be used to overcome an actual or provisional rejection based on nonstatutory double patenting provided the reference application or patent either is shown to be commonly owned with the examined application, or claims an invention made as a result of activities undertaken within the scope of a joint research agreement. See MPEP § 717.02 for applications subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA as explained in MPEP § 2159. See MPEP §§ 706.02(l)(1) - 706.02(l)(3) for applications not subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . A terminal disclaimer must be signed in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(b). The USPTO Internet website contains terminal disclaimer forms which may be used. Please visit www.uspto.gov/patent/patents-forms. The filing date of the application in which the form is filed determines what form (e.g., PTO/SB/25, PTO/SB/26, PTO/AIA /25, or PTO/AIA /26) should be used. A web-based eTerminal Disclaimer may be filled out completely online using web-screens. An eTerminal Disclaimer that meets all requirements is auto-processed and approved immediately upon submission. For more information about eTerminal Disclaimers, refer to www.uspto.gov/patents/process/file/efs/guidance/eTD-info-I.jsp. Claim 1-20 is rejected on the ground of nonstatutory double patenting as being unpatentable over claims 1-20 of U.S. Patent No. 12132957. Although the claims at issue are not identical, they are not patentably distinct from each other because they are different definitions or descriptions of the same subject matter varying in breadth and because of the claims in the instant application are broader than the claims in '301. A comparison of the claim language follows, where the similar language is underlined for identification: U.S. Patent No. 12132957 Instant Application 18/902258 1. A computing system comprising: a processor; and a non-transitory computer-readable storage medium, having stored thereon program instructions that, upon execution by the processor, cause performance of a set of operations comprising: determining that first media is exclusive to a streaming media provider based on an associated universal resource locator (“URL”) of the first media, metadata of the first media, or data provided by the streaming media provider about the first media; associating a first signature of the first media with the streaming media provider based on the first media being exclusive to the provider; and when a second signature of second media matches the first signature, identifying the streaming media provider as a provider of the second signature. 1. A computing system comprising: a processor; and a non-transitory computer-readable storage medium, having stored thereon program instructions that, upon execution by the processor, cause performance of a set of operations comprising: determining that media is exclusive to a streaming media provider based on data provided by the streaming media provider about the media; associating a signature of the media with the streaming media provider based on the media being exclusive to the streaming media provider; and logging the signature associated with the streaming media provider in a reference library. U.S. Patent No. 12132957 Instant Application 18/902258 9. A method comprising: determining that first media is exclusive to a streaming media provider based on an associated universal resource locator (“URL”) of the first media, metadata of the first media, or data provided by the streaming media provider about the first media; associating a first signature of the first media with the streaming media provider based on the first media being exclusive to the provider; and when a second signature of second media matches the first signature, identifying, the streaming media provider as a provider of the second signature. 9. A method comprising: determining that media is exclusive to a streaming media provider based on data provided by the streaming media provider about the media; associating a signature of the media with the streaming media provider based on the media being exclusive to the streaming media provider; and logging the signature associated with the streaming media provider in a reference library. U.S. Patent No. 12132957 Instant Application 18/902258 17. A non-transitory tangible computer readable storage medium comprising computer readable instructions which, when executed, cause a processor to at least: determine that first media is exclusive to a streaming media provider based on an associated universal resource locator (“URL”) of the first media, metadata of the first media, or data provided by the streaming media provider about the first media; associate a first signature of the first media with the streaming media provider based on the first media being exclusive to the provider; and when a second signature of second media matches the first signature, identify the streaming media provider as a provider of the second signature 17. A non-transitory computer-readable storage medium, having stored thereon program instructions that, upon execution by a processor, cause performance of a set of operations comprising: determining that media is exclusive to a streaming media provider based on data provided by the streaming media provider about the media; associating a signature of the media with the streaming media provider based on the media being exclusive to the streaming media provider; and logging the signature associated with the streaming media provider in a reference library. Claims 2-8, 10-16, and 18-20 of the instant application are similar to claims 2-8, 10-16, and 18-20 in patent application ‘957. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to CHRISTINE A KURIEN whose telephone number is (571)270-5694. The examiner can normally be reached M-F; 7:30-4:30. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Nathan Flynn can be reached on 571-272-1915. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /CHRISTINE A KURIEN/Examiner, Art Unit 2421 /NATHAN J FLYNN/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2421
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 30, 2024
Application Filed
Feb 07, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §DP (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12596327
Compact Self-Contained Holographic Display Device
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12587608
Signaling the Purpose of Preselection
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12587713
Screen Casting Method and Terminal
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12554155
TWO-WAY AUGMENTED SCREEN
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Patent 12556765
CONTENT ABRIDGEMENT
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
56%
Grant Probability
84%
With Interview (+27.8%)
3y 6m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 446 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month