Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026
Application No. 18/902,851

HEAT DISSIPATION DEVICE

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Sep 30, 2024
Priority
Jun 24, 2024 — CN 202410816512.9
Examiner
RUPPERT, ERIC S
Art Unit
3763
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Zhejiang Jinko Energy Storage Co. Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
60%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
9m
Est. Remaining
84%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 60% of resolved cases
60%
Career Allowance Rate
467 granted / 781 resolved
-10.2% vs TC avg
Strong +24% interview lift
Without
With
+24.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
45 currently pending
Career history
822
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
§103
51.4%
+11.4% vs TC avg
§102
17.4%
-22.6% vs TC avg
§112
28.8%
-11.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 781 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-2, 18-19 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102 (a) (1) as being anticipated by Takao (JP20211996086A). Regarding claim 1, Takao discloses a heat dissipation device (see Fig. 8-10) for an energy storage converter, configured to dissipate heat from a plurality of heating element, each heating element of the plurality of heating elements (10A-10C) including a respective plurality of heating units, the heat dissipation device comprising: a liquid-cooling plate (cooling device 1) and a plurality of heat pipes (heat pipes 3A-3D) arranged in a plurality of heat pipe assemblies, and each heat pipe assembly of the plurality of heat pipe assemblies including at least one respective heat pipe, wherein: a respective heat pipe assembly of the plurality of heat pipe assemblies is configured to be in contact with at least one corresponding heating element of the plurality of heating elements; each heat pipe of the respective heat pipe assembly is configured to be in contact with at least one heating unit of the at least one corresponding heating element, each heating unit of the at least one corresponding heating element is in contact with at least one heat pipe of the respective heat pipe assembly; and the liquid-cooling plate includes a liquid-cooling flow channel (path 50), and at least a portion of each heat pipe of the plurality of heat pipes is in thermal contact with the liquid-cooling flow channel and configured to transfer heat generated by the plurality of heating elements to the liquid-cooling flow channel. Regarding claim 2, Takao teaches the limitations of claim 1, and Takao further teaches each heat pipe of the plurality of heat pipes (heat pipes 3A-3D) has at least one of a configurable length or a configurable width, to enable control a temperature difference between every two heating units within a preset range of each other among the plurality of heating units. Regarding claim 18, Takao teaches the limitations of claim 2, and Takao further teaches each heat pipe (heat pipes 3A-3D) of the at least one respective heat pipe has a straight shape. Regarding claim 19, Takao teaches the limitations of claim 2, and Takao further teaches each heat pipe of the at least one respective heat pipe (heat pipes 3A-3D) is embedded in the liquid-cooling plate (via recesses 21A-21D). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 3, 16-17 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Takao (JP20211996086A) in view of Terakado (JP2012075251A). Regarding claim 3, Takao teaches the limitations of claim 2, and Takao does not teach the plurality of heat pipe assemblies are arranged at intervals along a flowing direction of liquid in the liquid-cooling flow channel, and the one respective heat pipe assembly of the plurality of heat pipe assemblies is arranged in contact with a same number of corresponding heating elements of the plurality of heating elements. Terakado teaches (see Fig. 1-3) the plurality of heat pipe assemblies (see array of heat pipes 41) are arranged at intervals along a flowing direction of liquid in the flow channel (see flow through fins 2), and the one respective heat pipe assembly of the plurality of heat pipe assemblies is arranged in contact with a same number of corresponding heating elements of the plurality of heating elements (see respective heating elements 3 for each grouping of three heat pipes). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified Takao to include the heat pipe arrangement of Terakado, in order to improve cooling efficiency (Page 3). Regarding claim 16, Takao teaches the limitations of claim 3, and Terakado further teaches the plurality of heating elements are arranged in rows and columns (3, see columns and rows thereof); a number of the plurality of heat pipe assemblies (41) is equal to a number of the columns of the plurality of heating elements; heating elements of the plurality of heating elements in a same column are arranged in contact with a corresponding heat pipe assembly of the plurality of heat pipe assemblies, and each heat pipe assembly of the plurality of heat pipe assemblies is arranged in contact with one respective column of heating elements. Regarding claim 17, Takao teaches the limitations of claim 16, and Terakado further teaches the respective plurality of heating units (3) arranged on each heating element of the plurality of heating elements are arranged in rows and columns; a number of the at least one respective heat pipes (41) of each heat pipe assembly of the plurality of heat pipe assemblies is equal to a number of the columns of the respective plurality of heating units arranged on each heating element of the plurality of heating elements; each column of heating units arranged on the at least one corresponding heating element of the plurality of heating elements is in contact with one respective heat pipe of the one respective heat pipe assembly of the plurality of heat pipe assemblies, and each heat pipe of the one respective heat pipe assembly is in contact with one respective column of heating units arranged on the at least one corresponding heating element. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 4-15, and 20 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ERIC S RUPPERT whose telephone number is (571)272-9911. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday 8 am - 4 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Len Tran can be reached at 571-272-1184. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ERIC S RUPPERT/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3763
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 30, 2024
Application Filed
Jul 28, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12751236
TEMPERATURE CONTROL SYSTEM WITH FLAMMABLE HEAT TRANSFER FLUID
2y 8m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12736268
REFRIGERATOR
2y 0m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12729883
SINGLE-WELL HEAT EXCHANGE SYSTEM AND DOWNHOLE ENHANCED HEAT EXCHANGE DEVICE OF GEOTHERMAL WELL
1y 11m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12723776
STEPPED SEGMENTAL BAFFLE FOR ELECTRIC PROCESS HEATER
3y 1m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12723818
HEAT EXCHANGER AND AIR CONDITIONER INCLUDING THE SAME
2y 11m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
60%
Grant Probability
84%
With Interview (+24.3%)
2y 9m (~9m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 781 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month