Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/903,053

Work Vehicle

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Oct 01, 2024
Priority
Oct 18, 2023 — JP 2023-179845
Examiner
BROWN, DREW J
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Kubota Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
90%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
95%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 90% — above average
90%
Career Allowance Rate
1235 granted / 1378 resolved
+29.6% vs TC avg
Moderate +6% lift
Without
With
+5.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
1y 10m
Avg Prosecution
28 currently pending
Career history
1390
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
§103
68.9%
+28.9% vs TC avg
§102
16.3%
-23.7% vs TC avg
§112
10.5%
-29.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1378 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Takagi et al. (US 9,796,406). With respect to claim 1, Takagi et al. disclose a work vehicle (Fig 1, column 12, l2ines 45-47), comprising: a body comprising a body frame (lateral frame 42 and vehicle frame) and provided with: a travel device (11, 12); and a transmission device (46) configured to adjust motive power for use to drive the travel device; a support frame (52) attached to the body frame (Figs 4-5); a steering wheel (21) attached to the support frame (attached to 52B via steering frame 51) and manually operable to steer the work vehicle; and a gear shifter (22) attached to the support frame (attached to 52E via guide member 54) and manually operable to operate the transmission device, and wherein the support frame allows the steering wheel and the gear shifter to be attached to the body (Figs 3-6). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 2 and 4 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Takagi et al. With respect to claim 2, Takagi et al. disclose a power steering motor (57) attached to the support frame (52D) and configured to assist operation of the steering wheel; and a steering control device (58) configured to operate the power steering motor, and wherein the support frame allows the power steering motor and the steering control device to be attached to the body (Figs 3-6), but Takagi et al. do not disclose that the steering control device is attached to the support frame. However, it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the invention was filed to also mount the control device to the support frame, since it has been held that rearranging parts of an invention involves only routine skill in the art. With respect to claim 4, Takagi et al. disclose wherein: the travel device comprises front wheels and rear wheels, the work vehicle further comprises a switching operation member manually switchable to set the work vehicle into a four-wheel drive mode in which the front wheels and the rear wheels are drivable, and a two-wheel drive mode in which the rear wheels are drivable, and the support frame allows the switching operation member to be attached to the body (column 7, lines 46-50), but do not disclose that the switching operation member is attached to the support frame. However, it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the invention was filed to also mount the switching operation member to the support frame, since it has been held that rearranging parts of an invention involves only routine skill in the art. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 3 and 5 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: With respect to claim 3, Takagi et al. disclose a parking brake but do not disclose that it is attached to the support frame; and one would not have found it obvious to move the parking brake from the seat area to the steering wheel area of the vehicle. With respect to claim 5, Takagi et al. disclose a vertical section of the body frame member 42 that is connected to a section of the support frame 52 but the section of the support frame that is attached to the body frame member 42 is below the body frame member 42 rather than above as shown in Fig 5. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to DREW J BROWN whose telephone number is (571)272-1362. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, John Olszewski can be reached at 571-272-2706. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. DREW BROWN Primary Examiner Art Unit 3616 /DREW J BROWN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3617
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 01, 2024
Application Filed
Jun 16, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12679500
MOTOR UNIT AND ELECTRIC BICYCLE
3y 1m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12679473
CAB SYSTEM FOR A VEHICLE
3y 7m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12673660
MACHINE TRACTION INDICATION FOR REMOTE CONTROL
2y 12m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12673738
WATERPROOF INTERNAL WIRING STRUCTURE FOR BICYCLE HEADSET
2y 4m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12673718
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR CONTROLLING HANDWHEEL RETURN TO CENTER VELOCITY
2y 9m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
90%
Grant Probability
95%
With Interview (+5.7%)
1y 10m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1378 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month