Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/903,088

POWER CONTOLLING METHOD FOR AN ELECTRIC VEHICLE AND AN ELECTRIC VEHICLE CONTROLLED BY THE SAME

Final Rejection §103
Filed
Oct 01, 2024
Priority
Oct 06, 2023 — RE 10-2023-0133397
Examiner
HINTON, HENRY R
Art Unit
3665
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Kia Corporation
OA Round
2 (Final)
74%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
10m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 74% — above average
74%
Career Allowance Rate
43 granted / 58 resolved
+22.1% vs TC avg
Strong +35% interview lift
Without
With
+34.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 10m
Avg Prosecution
15 currently pending
Career history
80
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
11.8%
-28.2% vs TC avg
§103
59.1%
+19.1% vs TC avg
§102
16.1%
-23.9% vs TC avg
§112
11.5%
-28.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 58 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Amendment/Arguments The 05/11/2026 Amendments to the claims are entered. Claims 1 and 14 are amended. No claims are canceled, withdrawn, or newly added. Claims 1-20 remain pending. Regarding Applicant’s arguments with respect to the prior art rejections, they are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1 and 14 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over US 20240092185 A1 to Zhao, Yanan et al. (“Zhao”), further in view of US 20130001058 A1 to Bowler, Mark et al. (“Bowler”). Regarding claim 1, Zhao teaches a method of controlling power of an electric vehicle (Zhao [0010]: “The following description relates to system and methods for operating a vehicle, including a battery electric vehicle (BEV).”), the electric vehicle including a start button (Zhao [0025]: “Still other examples may additionally or optionally use a start/stop button that is manually pressed by the operator to turn the vehicle on or off.”), a high voltage battery (Zhao [0015]: “In one example, electric energy storage device 132 is an onboard electrical energy storage device such as a high-voltage (HV) battery.”), at least one driving essential device configured to receive power from the high voltage battery (Zhao [0017]: “In one example, electric energy storage device 132 may supply power to one or more of electric machines 123, 135, and 126 for driving wheels 130b, 130a, 131a, and 131b, respectively.”), at least one convenience device configured to receive power from the high voltage battery (Zhao [0017]: “IN some examples, electric energy storage 132 may be configured to store electrical energy that may be supplied to other electrical loads residing on-board the vehicle (other than the electric machines 123, 135, 120, and 126), including HV components for auxiliary vehicle systems such as cabin heating and air conditioning, headlights, cabin audio and video systems, and the like.”). Zhao does not appear to expressly teach a controller configured to convert a power mode to one of an off mode, a first power mode, or a second power mode, the method comprising: converting, by the controller, the power mode to the first power mode in response to a determination that the start button is operated one time in the off mode; converting the power mode to the second power mode in response to a determination that the start button is operated and a brake is operated in the off mode or the first power mode; and converting the power mode to the off mode in response to a determination that a first set time elapses in the first power mode, wherein the first power mode is a mode in which the power is only applied to the at least one convenience device and power supply to the at least one driving essential device is restricted, and wherein the second power mode is a mode in which the power is applied to the at least one driving essential device. However, Bowler teaches a controller configured to convert a power mode to one of an off mode, a first power mode, or a second power mode (FIG. 3; [0025]: Controller 104 uses control logic to cycle through three “modes:” one mode where the vehicle is not running and the accessory output is not activated, one mode where only the accessory output is activated, and another mode where the vehicle is running.), the method comprising: converting, by the controller, the power mode to the first power mode in response to a determination that the start button is operated one time in the off mode (FIG. 3; [0026]: In initial step 302, when the first touch is received, the vehicle either turns on only the accessory output in step 310, or starts the engine 312. Because neither the engine nor the accessory mode is activated, the accessory mode must be entered from a mode in which both the vehicle and accessories are turned off. Only the accessory output being activated reads on the first power mode. All outputs being off, including the engine being off, taken as being in the off mode.); converting the power mode to the second power mode in response to a determination that the start button is operated and a brake is operated in the off mode (FIG. 3: Engine running taken as the second power mode, can be entered from the off mode if the touch input and brake input are detected. Note that engine running includes power to the accessories, but the first power mode is that in which only the accessories are operational.) or the first power mode (FIG. 3: The controller can start the vehicle from the state of only the accessory mode being activated (310) if a touch input and brake input are detected. ); and converting the power mode to the off mode in response to a determination that a first set time elapses in the first power mode ([0029]: “In step 320, the accessory output 111 will remain on for ten minutes, . . . upon which point the accessory output w11 will be shut off in step 324.” Only powering the accessories remains the first power mode, regardless of whether the controller enters that mode before or after the vehicle was started and running.), wherein the first power mode is a mode in which the power is only applied to the at least one convenience device and power supply to the at least one driving essential device is restricted ([0020]; [0024]: “The purpose of powering the accessory devices 18 separately is to isolate them from other components of the vehicle 1 that are generally only needed when the vehicle 1 is being used for transportation, is to keep them from being powered on while the engine 3 is not running thus saving battery 13 power needed to start the engine 3.” Bowler also considers that the vehicle may be a battery-powered electric vehicle, see [0012]. One of ordinary skill in the art would have understood that the techniques would apply to the electric drive motor of an EV as well as to the engine of an internal combustion engine car. Accessories are disclosed as entertainment and convenience features.), and wherein the second power mode is a mode in which the power is applied to the at least one driving essential device ([0027]-[0028]: The engine running taken as the second power mode. One of ordinary skill in the art would have recognized from [0012] that a similar technique can be used for activating driving essential devices of an electric vehicle as well as those of an internal combustion engine vehicle.). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date to have combined the electric vehicle comprising a start button of Zhao with the system for entering various power states based on combinations of button, brake, and time inputs of Bowler. Doing so would have provided the user more options for how to control the vehicle, improving its versatility. Claim 14 is rejected over similar reasons to claim 1, as applied to the electric vehicle described in claim 1. Claims 2-4, 13, and 15-17 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over US 20240092185 A1 to Zhao, Yanan et al. (“Zhao”) in view of US 20130001058 A1 to Bowler, Mark et al. (“Bowler”), further in view of The Kia EV6 Owner’s Manual (“the KIA Manual”). Regarding claim 2, the above combination of prior art teaches the method of claim 1. This combination does not appear to expressly teach converting, by the controller, the power mode to the off mode in response to a determination that the start button is operated before the first set time elapses in the first power mode. However, the Kia Manual teaches converting, by the controller, the power mode to the off mode in response to a determination that the start button is operated before the first set time elapses in the first power mode (Manual 6-8: The KIA manual teaches pressing the EV button twice when in ACC to exit ACC and go into OFF mode. Bowler is relied upon to teach the structure of ACC mode and off mode, while the Manual is relied upon to teach exiting an ACC mode and going to off mode on demand via button operation.). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the present invention to have combined the system that keeps the accessories powered for some time after powering off the vehicle ignition of the above combination of prior art with the system that allows the accessories to be powered off upon operation of the button before they turn off automatically of the Kia Manual. Doing so would have provided the user more functionality by allowing them to control powering off of the system outside of any elapsed time. Regarding claim 3, the above combination of prior art teaches the method of claim 1. This combination does not appear to expressly teach converting, by the controller, the power mode from the second power mode to the first power mode in response to a determination that the start button is operated in a state that a shift lever is not in P range or during driving. However, the KIA Manual teaches converting, by the controller, the power mode from the second power mode to the first power mode in response to a determination that the start button is operated in a state that a shift lever is not in P range or during driving (Manual 6-7: “When you press the EV button without the shifter dial in the P (Park) position, the EV button will not change to the ACC position.”). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date to have combined the system that converts from a running state to an accessory state in response to the push of a button of Bowler with the system that ensures that an accessory position is entered when the button is operated in a running vehicle not in Park of the KIA Manual. Doing so would have improved user operability by providing another way to enter accessory mode. Regarding claim 4, the above combination of prior art teaches the method of claim 1. This combination does not appear to expressly teach converting, by the controller, the power mode to a third power mode in response to a determination that the third power mode is selected through a user settings menu of a user interface in the first power mode or the second power mode, wherein the third power mode is a mode in which the power is applied to the at least one convenience device. However, the KIA Manual teaches converting, by the controller, the power mode to a third power mode in response to a determination that the third power mode is selected through a user settings menu of a user interface in the first power mode or the second power mode (Manual 1-16, System Setting and Activation: Users can select utility mode from the vehicle infotainment system, which is accessible when the vehicle is running or in ACC.) wherein the third power mode is a mode in which the power is applied to the at least one convenience device (Manual 1-16: “When driving is not necessary . . . , it is possible to use the electrical devices (audio, lights, etc.) for long hours.” Description of Utility Mode.) It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date to have combined the vehicle system that converts between power modes of an electric vehicle using button inputs of Bowler with the vehicle infotainment system and controller that allows for selection of a utility mode where the accessory devices stay on for long periods of the KIA Manual. Doing so would have improved user convenience by allowing them to operate accessories for a long time without having to restart the accessory mode timer. Regarding claim 13, the above combination of prior art teaches the method of claim 1. This combination does not appear to expressly teach outputting, by the controller, a warning message, in at least one of a first case where conversion to the off mode is requested according to operation of the start button or a vehicle door is opened in a state where a shift lever is not in P range in the second power mode, a second case where conversion to the second power mode is requested by operation of the start button in a state where the shift lever is not in P range in the first power mode, or a third case where conversion to the second power mode is requested by operation of the brake and the start button in a state where the shift lever is not in P range. However, the KIA Manual teaches outputting, by the controller, a warning message, in at least one of a first case where conversion to the off mode is requested according to operation of the start button or a vehicle door is opened in a state where a shift lever is not in P range in the second power mode (Manual 5-74: “Shift to P[:] This warning message is displayed if you try to turn off the vehicle with the gear in the N (Neutral) position.”), a second case where conversion to the second power mode is requested by operation of the start button in a state where the shift lever is not in P range in the first power mode, or a third case where conversion to the second power mode is requested by operation of the brake and the start button in a state where the shift lever is not in P range (Manual 5-74: “Shift to P to start vehicle[:] This warning message is displayed if you try to start the vehicle without shifting to the P (Park) position.”). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the present invention to have combined the system that puts the vehicle in various power modes depending on the operation of a pushbutton and the brake pedal taught by the above combination of prior art with the system of the KIA Manual which further teaches displaying warning messages when the button and brake pedal are not operated in the proper gear. Doing so would have improved user convenience and safety by providing guidance to the user if their inputs are incorrect or unsafe. Claims 15-17 are rejected over similar reasons to claims 2-4, respectively, applied to an electric vehicle as similarly described in the method of claim 1. Claims 6 and 19 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over US 20240092185 A1 to Zhao, Yanan et al. (“Zhao”) in view of US 20130001058 A1 to Bowler, Mark et al. (“Bowler”) and the KIA Manual, further in view of Tesla Model Y Camping (Camp Mode)-All your questions answered., a YouTube video to Iowa Tesla Guy (“Iowa Tesla Guy”). Regarding claim 6, the above combination of prior art teaches the method of claim 4. This combination does not appear to expressly teach automatically converting the power mode to the third power mode in response to a determination that a state of charge (SOC) of the high voltage battery equal to or greater than a first set SOC. However, Iowa Tesla Guy teaches automatically converting the power mode to the third power mode in response to a determination that a state of charge (SOC) of the high voltage battery equal to or greater than a first set SOC (Iowa Tesla Guy [04:55]: The video shows that Camp Mode may only be activated when the battery level is above 20 percent.). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the present invention to have combined the system that allows for menu selection of a third power mode taught by the above combination of prior art with the menu-selected third power mode that cannot be activated when the battery level is lower than 20 percent taught by Iowa Tesla Guy. Doing so would have prevented excessive battery discharge while in the third mode, improving the life of the battery. Claim 19 is likewise rejected over similar reasons to claim 6, applied to the electric vehicle of claim 14. Claims 7 and 20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over US 20240092185 A1 to Zhao, Yanan et al. (“Zhao”) in view of US 20130001058 A1 to Bowler, Mark et al. (“Bowler”) and the KIA Manual, further in view of Ford F-150 LIGHTNING Owner’s Manual (“the Ford Manual”), copyright 2022 to the Ford Motor Company. Regarding claim 7, the above combination of prior art teaches the method of claim 4. This combination does not appear to expressly teach outputting, by the controller, a warning message through the user interface in response to a determination that the SOC of the high voltage battery reaches a second set SOC in the third power mode. However, the Ford Manual teaches outputting, by the controller, a warning message through the user interface in response to a determination that the SOC of the high voltage battery reaches a second set SOC in the third power mode (Ford Manual p. 187: “A notification indicates when the vehicle reaches the pre-set limit and Pro Power Onboard turns off.” Notification taken as a warning message. The pre-set limit is described as a battery reserve limit. Pro Power Onboard taken as analogous to a utility mode, as it allows the high-voltage battery to power loads other than the wheels.). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the present invention to have combined the system enabling the vehicle to switch between power modes including a utility mode taught by the above combination of prior art with the system that issues a notification when a pre-set reserve limit is reached in a utility mode taught by the Ford manual. Doing so would have prevented excessive battery drain by notifying the user of when the reserve limit is reached. Claim 20 is likewise rejected over similar reasons as claim 7, applied to the electric vehicle of claim 14. Claim 11 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over US 20240092185 A1 to Zhao, Yanan et al. (“Zhao”) in view of US 20130001058 A1 to Bowler, Mark et al. (“Bowler”) and the KIA Manual, further in view of 2022 KIA EV6 Features & Functions Guide (“the Features & Functions Guide”). Regarding claim 11, the above combination of prior art teaches the method of claim 1, comprising: converting, by the controller the power mode to the first power mode (Bowler FIG. 3: The controller can at least convert to the first mode where only accessories are powered.). This combination does not appear to expressly teach converting a shift lever to the P range. However, the KIA manual teaches converting a shift lever to P range in order to turn off the vehicle power (KIA Manual 6-11: “N (Neutral) . . . To turn off the vehicle from the ACC position, press the [P] button within 3 minutes. The vehicle will shift to P (Park) and turn off.”). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the present invention to have combined the system that uses a button to change between vehicle power modes of the above combination of prior art with the controller that can convert a shift range to P when a button is operated to turn the vehicle off in Neutral. Doing so would have improved vehicle safety by preventing the user from accidentally leaving the vehicle in neutral when they shut the vehicle off, preventing the vehicle from rolling away. Bowler further teaches converting the second power mode to the first power mode upon touch input of the button by exiting the vehicle running state and leaving only accessory power on when the input is performed while the vehicle is running. See for example FIG. 3. The accessory mode automatically turns off after an amount of time elapses, entering the off mode. This reads on converting the first power mode to the off mode, in response to a determination that the start button is operated in the second power mode because the start button is operated in the running state, causing entry into the accessory state which eventually shifts to the off state. The above combination does not appear to expressly teach performing this conversion when the start button in the second power mode is operated during driving. However, the Features & Functions Guide teaches performing this conversion when the start button in the second power mode is operated during driving (Features & Functions Guide p. 40: “REMINDERS: IN an emergency situation while the vehicle is in motion, you are able to turn the vehicle off and to the ACC position by pressing the POWER button for more than 2 seconds or 3 times successively within 3 seconds”). In light of the Features & Functions Guide, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the present invention that button operation during the run state of Bowler to change to the accessory state would have been performable while the vehicle is driving. Claim 12 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over US 20240092185 A1 to Zhao, Yanan et al. (“Zhao”) in view of US 20130001058 A1 to Bowler, Mark et al. (“Bowler”) and the KIA Manual, further in view of 2022 KIA EV6 Features & Functions Guide (“the Features & Functions Guide”). Regarding claim 12, the above combination of prior art teaches the method of claim 1. This combination does not appear to expressly teach wherein converting the power mode to the second power mode comprises: converting the power mode to the second power mode in response to recognition of a digital key within the electric vehicle when a second set time has elapsed since a start of the first power mode; and converting the power mode to the second power mode without the recognition of a digital key within the electric vehicle when the second set time has not yet elapsed. However, Shimomura teaches wherein converting the power mode to the second power mode comprises: converting the power mode to the second power mode in response to recognition of a digital key within the electric vehicle when a second set time has elapsed since a start of the first power mode (Shimomura [0046]: “The immobilizer ECU 11 furthermore sets the remote immobilizer as shown from the point F to a time point G in (a) and (b) of FIG. 2, when ACC of the power supply condition has elapsed for a predetermined time.”; Shimomura [0017]: “The immobilizer ECU 11 outputs a drive signal to the engine ECU 20 based upon an identification signal transmitted from the key 40 . . . .”; Shimomura [0024]: “Only in a case that the immobilizer ECU 11 unsets the immobilizer, that is, when a drive signal indicative of driver permission of engine 30 is outputted, the engine ECU 20 starts operations of its starter motor, fuel injection device and ignition device based upon a starting signal supplied from an ignition switch (not shown).” One of ordinary skill in the art would have recognized that starting a gasoline engine based on switch output is analogous to turning electric drive motors on in an electric vehicle); and converting the power mode to the second power mode without the recognition of a digital key within the electric vehicle when the second set time has not yet elapsed (Shimomura FIG. 2: See for example time period A-B. When the immobilizer is unset while power is in ACC, the vehicle may be started (taken as switched to IG) without needing to first receive a signal from the key (which would be needed to unset the immobilizer, see above).). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the present invention to have combined the system for starting/stopping a vehicle using a pushbutton taught by the above combination of prior art with the system that only allows the stopping/starting of a vehicle after a predetermined time elapsed in the ACC mode upon the receipt of a signal from a key taught by Shimomura. Doing so would have improved vehicle security by ensuring the vehicle cannot be started and driven away without key registration after a certain amount of time. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 5, 8-10 ,and 18 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Kim Jun Ki. KR 20180076737 A. POWER CONTROL METHOD AND DEVICE FOR A CAR HAVING PUSH-BUTTON IGNITION SYSTEM AND SBW SYSTEM. Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to HENRY RICHARD HINTON whose telephone number is (703)756-1051. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 7:30-4:30. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Hunter Lonsberry can be reached at (571) 272-7298. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /HENRY R HINTON/Examiner, Art Unit 3665 /HUNTER B LONSBERRY/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 3665
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 01, 2024
Application Filed
Feb 09, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
May 11, 2026
Response Filed
Aug 25, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12749202
STARNAV OPTICAL SENSOR SYSTEM
2y 9m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12703396
UNKNOWN DRIVING HAZARD DETECTION AND RESPONSE SYSTEM
2y 7m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12680830
METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR ESTIMATING THE POSITION OF A RAILWAY VEHICLE TRAVELLING ALONG A RAILWAY LINE, AND RAILWAY VEHICLE COMPRISING SUCH SYSTEM
2y 0m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12662165
TRAJECTORY PREDICTION BY SAMPLING SEQUENCES OF DISCRETE MOTION TOKENS
2y 3m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12644711
ON-PREMISES POSITIONING DETERMINATION AND ANALYTICS SYSTEM
3y 8m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
74%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+34.8%)
2y 10m (~10m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 58 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month