Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/904,317

SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR UTILITY CONTAINER WITH GRINDER

Final Rejection §112
Filed
Oct 02, 2024
Priority
Oct 09, 2023 — provisional 63/543,244
Examiner
ALAWADI, MOHAMMED S
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Brakr LLC
OA Round
2 (Final)
74%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
9m
Est. Remaining
98%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 74% — above average
74%
Career Allowance Rate
533 granted / 718 resolved
+14.2% vs TC avg
Strong +24% interview lift
Without
With
+23.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
77 currently pending
Career history
773
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
68.6%
+28.6% vs TC avg
§102
8.3%
-31.7% vs TC avg
§112
21.9%
-18.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 718 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed 06/11/2026 with respect Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. The Applicant argued that “claims 1, 12 and 19 and their associated dependent claims, collectively claims 1-25, are believed in condition for allowance as noted by the Examiner”. In response to this argument, claims 1, 12 and 19 still rejected under 35 U.S.C. §112 because it is unclear which element having “a first end”. Accordingly, this argument is not persuasive. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-25 rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Regarding claim 1, the phrase “a housing providing an at least one internal storage area proximate to a first end” because it is unclear which element having “a first end”. Claims 2-11 are rejected because they depend from claim 1. Regarding claim 12, the phrase “a housing providing an at least one internal storage area proximate to a first end” because it is unclear which element having “a first end”. Claims 13-18 are rejected because they depend from claim 12. Regarding claim 19, the phrase “providing a housing providing an at least one internal storage area proximate to a first end” because it is unclear which element having “a first end”. Claims 20-25 are rejected because they depend from claim 19. Allowable Subject Matter The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: Regarding claim 1, the closet prior art is Griffin (US8220732B2), however in the opinion of the Examiner that the arts of record neither anticipates nor render obvious the limitation of “the removable grinder cap structured and arranged to be disposed within the housing below the lid” in combination with the other limitations of the claim. Claims 2-11 are depended from claim 1. Regarding claim 12, the closet prior art is Griffin (US8220732B2), however in the opinion of the Examiner that the arts of record neither anticipates nor render obvious the limitation of “the second grinder element structured and arranged to in a first instance nest within the at least one internal storage area adjacent to the lid” in combination with the other limitations of the claim. Claims 13-18 are depended from claim 12. Regarding claim 19, the closet prior art is Griffin (US8220732B2), however in the opinion of the Examiner that the arts of record neither anticipates nor render obvious the limitation of “the second grinder element structured and arranged to in a first instance nest within the at least one internal storage area adjacent to the lid” in combination with the other limitations of the claim. Claims 20-25 are depended from claim 19. Claims 1, 12 and 19 would be allowable if rewritten or amended to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action. Conclusion THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MOHAMMED S ALAWADI whose telephone number is (571)272-2224. The examiner can normally be reached 08:00 am- 05:00 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, CHRISTOPHER TEMPLETON can be reached at (571)270-1477. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /MOHAMMED S. ALAWADI/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3725
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 02, 2024
Application Filed
Jun 02, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112
Jun 11, 2026
Response Filed
Jun 30, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12678846
PLATE CROWN CONTROL DEVICE
2y 8m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12673306
PULPING MACHINE
2y 8m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12673327
FRETTING WEAR REDUCTION IN INTERFERENCE FIT OF CONE CRUSHER HEAD
2y 6m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12668539
ARRANGEMENT AND METHOD FOR MIXING A PASTE AT A WASTE DISPOSAL SITE
4y 7m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12667226
BEAN GRINDING COFFEE MACHINE AND BEAN GRINDING COFFEE MACHINE CONTROL METHOD
2y 7m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
74%
Grant Probability
98%
With Interview (+23.8%)
2y 7m (~9m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 718 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month