Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026
Application No. 18/904,897

METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR CHANNEL STATE INFORMATION REPORTING IN MOBILE WIRELESS COMMUNICATION SYSTEM

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Oct 02, 2024
Priority
Oct 10, 2023 — RE 10-2023-0134266
Examiner
MOORE JR, MICHAEL J
Art Unit
2467
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Soenghun KIM
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
90%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
8m
Est. Remaining
94%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 90% — above average
90%
Career Allowance Rate
826 granted / 918 resolved
+32.0% vs TC avg
Minimal +4% lift
Without
With
+4.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
25 currently pending
Career history
951
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
7.4%
-32.6% vs TC avg
§103
35.1%
-4.9% vs TC avg
§102
26.2%
-13.8% vs TC avg
§112
17.7%
-22.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 918 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 10/2/24 is in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner. Claim Objections Claims 6-12, 14, and 19 are objected to because of the following informalities: Regarding claim 6, on line 5, it appears that the word “a” is missing before the word “first”. Regarding claim 7, on line 5, it appears that the word “a” is missing before the word “second”. Regarding claim 8, on line 5, it appears that the word “a” is missing before the word “first”. Also, on line 7, it appears that the word “a” is missing before the word “number”. Also, on line 8, it appears that the word “a” is missing before the word “number”. Regarding claim 9, on line 5, it appears that the word “a” is missing before the word “second”. Regarding claim 10, on line 3, it appears that the word “a” is missing before the term “SSB”. Also, on line 4, it appears that the word “a” is missing before the term “SSB”. Regarding claim 11, on line 3, it appears that the word “a” is missing before the word “number”. Also, on line 4, it appears that the word “a” is missing before the word “number”. Regarding claim 12, on line 3, it appears that the word “a” is missing before the term “SSB”. Also, on line 4, it appears that the word “a” is missing before the term “SSB”. Regarding claim 14, on line 3, it appears that the word “is” should instead be “are”. Regarding claim 19, on line 19, it appears that the word “is” should instead be “are”. Also, on line 24, it appears that the word “is” should instead be “are”. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claim 15 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 15 recites the limitation "the first specific bit of the second MAC CE" in lines 2-3. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Claim 15 also recites the limitation "the second specific bit of the second MAC CE" in lines 4-5. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-14 and 16-19 are allowable over the prior art of record. Claim 15 would be allowable if rewritten or amended to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: Regarding claim 1, the prior art of record generally teaches the reception of an RRC reconfiguration message as well as the reception of MAC CEs and related CSI reporting and CSI configurations (see e.g. paragraphs [0101], [0186], [0354], and [0672] of Zhou et al. (U.S. 2025/0380174)). However, Zhou et al. as well as the other prior art of record fail to teach or suggest “wherein: the RRC reconfiguration message comprises a first Channel State Information (CSI) resource configuration list and one or more embedded RRC reconfiguration messages; each of the one or more embedded RRC reconfiguration messages comprises a special cell configuration and one or more secondary cell configurations; and the special cell configuration comprises a first CSI report configuration list, a second CSI report configuration list, and a second CSI resource configuration list” as well as “wherein the specific CSI report configuration is determined based on: the first CSI report configuration list in case of the first MAC CE for CSI report; and the second CSI report configuration list in case of the second MAC CE for CSI report” in combination with the other limitations of claim 1. Regarding claims 2-14, 16, and 17, these claims are further limiting to claim 1 and are thus also allowable over the prior art of record. Similar reasoning applies to corresponding “terminal” and “method by a base station” claims 18 and 19. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. References considered relevant to this application are listed in the attached “Notice of References Cited” (PTO-892). Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MICHAEL J. MOORE, JR., whose telephone number is (571)272-3168. The examiner can normally be reached M-F (9am-4pm). Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Hassan A Phillips can be reached at (571)272-3940. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /MICHAEL J MOORE JR/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2467
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 02, 2024
Application Filed
Oct 15, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12745262
TECHNIQUES FOR UPDATING TRANSMISSION CONFIGURATION INDICATOR (TCI) STATES IN WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS
2y 12m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12745198
Configuring Timing Offsets in Integrated Access Backhaul (IAB) Networks with Multiple Available Timing Modes
2y 9m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12732966
METHOD AND DEVICE IN NODES USED FOR WIRELESS COMMUNICATION
3y 0m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12726984
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR TRANSMITTING UPLINK CONTROL INFORMATION
2y 11m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12707476
METHOD, USER EQUIPMENT, PROCESSING DEVICE AND STORAGE MEDIUM FOR RECEIVING DOWNLINK SIGNAL, AND METHOD AND BASE STATION FOR TRANSMITTING DOWNLINK SIGNAL
2y 11m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
90%
Grant Probability
94%
With Interview (+4.3%)
2y 9m (~8m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 918 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month