Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/905,105

SUBSEQUENT PREAMBLE-LESS EARLY DATA TRANSMISSION

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Oct 02, 2024
Examiner
LEE, CHI HO A
Art Unit
2475
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Qualcomm Incorporated
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
92%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
3m
Est. Remaining
97%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 92% — above average
92%
Career Allowance Rate
1273 granted / 1382 resolved
+34.1% vs TC avg
Minimal +5% lift
Without
With
+4.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 3m
Avg Prosecution
32 currently pending
Career history
1410
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
4.5%
-35.5% vs TC avg
§103
43.7%
+3.7% vs TC avg
§102
22.2%
-17.8% vs TC avg
§112
14.3%
-25.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1382 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-7 and 9-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by PARK et al PG PUB 2022/0210868. Re Claims 1, 19 and 20, PARK et al teaches in figure 29, a UE (memory, processor) transmitting a EDT UL data including and RAI (an indication) indicating subsequent UL data [0270]; the UE transmitting the subsequent UP data after the EDT communication wherein the subsequent communication is transmitted in a transmission occasion based at least in part on the indication [0313]. Re Claims 2, 16, PARK et al teaches the RAI indicates subsequent EDT communication. Re Claims 3, 4, PARK et al the EDT communication includes NAS signaling [0242] such as first/second segment NAS PDU. Re Claim 5, PARK et al teaches in figure 17 the EDT transmission includes a PDU session ID (identifier) associated with the data, and subsequent EDT communication includes a PDU session ID (an identifier) associated with the data [0234]. Re Claims 6, 13, PARK et al teaches EDT communication includes a RRC early data request message (RRC message) [0233]. Re Claim 7, PARK et al teaches in figure 27, the UE receiving DL data (a subsequent transmission) response after transmitting the EDT transmission wherein the gNB-CU determines whether to perform RRC release procedure (the subsequent transmission response). Re Claim 9, PARK et al teaches the EDT communication includes UL RRC message transfer message [0288]. Re Claim 10, PARK et al teaches the subsequent transmission response, See figure 13B, a Msg B 1332 which includes a contention resolution identifier, RNTI to be used for the subsequent EDT transmission, uplink grant (a set of resources) to be used for the subsequent EDT transmission, and a TA command [0199]. Re Claims 11, 12, PARK et al teaches subsequent transmission response can include a plurality of multiplexed MAC PDU [0082 0278] or a single subsequent DL data transmission or MAC PDU [0278]. Re Claim 14, PARK et al teaches in figure 13A teaches a contention-based for supporting subsequent EDT communication associated with PUR (preconfigured uplink resources) [0244] wherein based on the PUR configuration [0246] which can indicate the periodicity (a periodic common uplink channel resource). Re Claim 15, PARK et al teaches the PUR configuration can indicate a time offset (the indication) [0246] wherein based on the time offset, the UE will wait for a subsequent transmission response, prior to transmitting the subsequent EDT communication. Re Claims 17, 18, PARK et al teaches based on the PUR fallback indication (EDT fallback) and the PUR was successful (satisfaction of an EDT fallback condition) after retransmission (after transmitting the subsequent EDT communication) [0257], the one or more successfully transmitted NAS PDUs are discarded. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim 8 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over PARK et al PG PUB 2022/0210868 in view of Myrberg et al PG PUB 2026/0059463. Re Claim 8, PARK et al fails to explicitly teach the subsequent EDT transmission in a contention-free resource indicated in the subsequent transmission response.”. However, Myrberg et al teaches the NR-Rel-17 supports contention-free resources to carry user data in RRC messages [0008]. By combining the teachings, based on the subsequent transmission response, the subsequent EDT transmission can be transmitted in the contention-free resources as supported by the NR-Rel-17. One skilled in the art would have been motivated to be consistent with the known standard. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one skilled to have combined the teachings. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ANDREW LEE whose telephone number is (571)272-3130. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 8:30AM-5PM ET. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, KASSIM KHALAD can be reached at 5712703770. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ANDREW LEE/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2475
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 02, 2024
Application Filed
Aug 13, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12750861
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR INDICATING PHYSICAL DOWNLINK SHARED CHANNEL MONITORING, AND MEDIUM
3y 3m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12745258
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR DETERMINING POSITION OF CONTROL CHANNEL ELEMENT, AND STORAGE MEDIUM
3y 5m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12745175
Network Energy Saving for Bandwidth Part
1y 10m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12739842
COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK AND METHODS WITH ENHANCED DUPLEX
3y 10m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12739843
Conditions for Skipping Resource Evaluation for Sidelink
3y 5m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
92%
Grant Probability
97%
With Interview (+4.6%)
2y 3m (~3m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1382 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month