Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/905,499

DISPLAY APPARATUS AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING THE SAME

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Oct 03, 2024
Examiner
LEA EDMONDS, LISA S
Art Unit
2847
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
LG Display Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
87%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 0m
To Grant
92%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 87% — above average
87%
Career Allow Rate
658 granted / 759 resolved
+18.7% vs TC avg
Minimal +5% lift
Without
With
+4.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 0m
Avg Prosecution
9 currently pending
Career history
768
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.5%
-39.5% vs TC avg
§103
22.9%
-17.1% vs TC avg
§102
56.3%
+16.3% vs TC avg
§112
15.1%
-24.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 759 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 10/03/2024 was considered by the examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1-4 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Hirabayshi (20180164923) in view of Kim et al. (12568592). With respect to claim 1, Hirabayshi discloses a display apparatus comprising: a display module (3, 101) configured to display an image; a metal plate (8) disposed behind the display module (101); a cover member (1) disposed in front of the display module (101); and an adhesive member (2, 6) disposed between the display module (101) and the metal plate (8), wherein the adhesive member (2, 6) includes a protective part (6) attached to side surfaces of the display module (3). Hirabayshi fails to teach the protective part having an end attached to the cover member. Kim et al. discloses an adhesive member (530) includes a protective part (side of 530). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill I the art at the time the invention was made to incorporate the teachings of Kim et al. into the apparatus of Hirabayshi. One having ordinary skill in the art would have been motivated to integrally form the adhesive member (2, 6) so that the number of parts and steps in an assembling process can be reduced, since it has been held to be within the general skill of a worker in the art to make plural parts unitary as a matter of obvious engineering choice. With respect to claim 2, Hirabayshi in view of Kim et al. discloses the display apparatus of claim 1, wherein the protective part (6 of Hirabayshi as modified by 530 of Kim et al.) is bent from the side surfaces of the display module (3, 101). With respect to claim 3, Hirabayshi in view of Kim et al. discloses the display apparatus of claim 1. Hirabayshi in view of Kim et al. fails to expressly teach the adhesive member (6 or 530) being made of an opaque material. One having ordinary skill in the art would have been motivated to select an adhesive that is opaque, since it has been held that such selection of materials are within the general skill of a worker in the art as a matter of obvious engineering choice. With respect to claim 4, Hirabayshi in view of Kim et al. discloses the display apparatus of claim 2, further comprising an adhesive layer (2, 6 of Hirabayshi as modified by 530 of Kim et al.) disposed between the cover member (1) and the display module (3, 101), wherein the protective part (6 of Hirabayshi as modified by 530 of Kim et al.) is attached to side surfaces of the adhesive layer (2). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 12-17 are allowed. The following is an examiner’s statement of reasons for allowance: as to claims 12-14, patentability resides, at least in part, in the method of manufacturing a display apparatus, comprising: providing a package including an adhesive member and a metal plate coupled to the adhesive member; coupling the package to a display module; removing an adhesive film that couples a cutting part of the metal plate to the adhesive member; bending the protective part of the adhesive member; and attaching the protective part to side surfaces of the display module as claimed; as to claims 15-17; patentability resides, at least in part, in the display apparatus comprising: a display module configured to display an image; a metal plate disposed behind the display module; a printed circuit board disposed behind the metal plate; a chip on film (COF) having a first side electrically connected to the display module and a second side electrically connected to the printed circuit board; a cover member disposed in front of the display module; and an adhesive member disposed between the display module and the metal plate, wherein the adhesive member includes a protective part attached to side surfaces of the display module, the protective part having one end attached to the cover member as claimed. Any comments considered necessary by applicant must be submitted no later than the payment of the issue fee and, to avoid processing delays, should preferably accompany the issue fee. Such submissions should be clearly labeled “Comments on Statement of Reasons for Allowance.” Claims 5-11 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: as to claims 5 and 6, patentability resides, at least in part, in the display module includes: a back plate disposed in front of the adhesive member; and a display panel disposed in front of the back plate and configured to display the image as claimed and including all of the other limitations of the base claim(s) respectfully; as to claims 7-11, patentability resides, at least in part, in the adhesive member and the metal plate are one package coupled to the display module as claimed and including all of the other limitations of the base claim(s) respectfully. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. The prior art of record fails to teach or fairly suggest the invention as claimed. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to LISA LEA-EDMONDS whose telephone number is (571)272-2043. The examiner can normally be reached M-F. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Timothy Thompson can be reached at 571-272-2342. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. LISA LEA-EDMONDS Primary Examiner Art Unit 2847 /LISA LEA-EDMONDS/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2847 2026-03-16
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 03, 2024
Application Filed
Mar 16, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12602075
ELECTRONIC DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12602092
FOLDABLE-SCREEN DEVICE AND HINGE COMPONENT
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12591275
SUPPORT AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING SAME, FLEXIBLE DISPLAY MODULE, AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12591269
ELECTRONIC DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12585306
DEVICE TO ALLOW SENSORS T0 OPERATE WHEN LID IS CLOSED
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
87%
Grant Probability
92%
With Interview (+4.9%)
2y 0m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 759 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month