Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 01, 2026
Application No. 18/905,830

POE PD Redundant System

Final Rejection §102§112
Filed
Oct 03, 2024
Priority
Apr 04, 2024 — provisional 63/574,589
Examiner
PATEL, HETUL B
Art Unit
3992
Tech Center
3900
Assignee
Microchip Technology Incorporated
OA Round
2 (Final)
63%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
1y 3m
Est. Remaining
66%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 63% of resolved cases
63%
Career Allowance Rate
132 granted / 209 resolved
+3.2% vs TC avg
Minimal +3% lift
Without
With
+3.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 3m
Avg Prosecution
4 currently pending
Career history
214
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
5.1%
-34.9% vs TC avg
§103
39.9%
-0.1% vs TC avg
§102
25.2%
-14.8% vs TC avg
§112
19.8%
-20.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 209 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
DETAILED ACTION This Office action is in response to the response filed on 4/29/2026. Claims 1-2, 7-9, 11-12, 14-16 and 18 are amended. Claims 1-20 are currently pending this application. Specification The specification amendment filed 4/29/2026 is accepted and entered. Drawings The specification amendment filed 4/29/2026 is accepted and entered. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of 35 U.S.C. 112(a): (a) IN GENERAL.—The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor or joint inventor of carrying out the invention. The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112: The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor of carrying out his invention. Claims 1-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(a) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), first paragraph, as failing to comply with the written description requirement. The claim(s) contains subject matter which was not described in the specification in such a way as to reasonably convey to one skilled in the relevant art that the inventor or a joint inventor, or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the inventor(s), at the time the application was filed, had possession of the claimed invention. Every claim now recites the limitation of "a non-PoE power source directly connected to the PD consumer device" (Emphasis added). Applicant points to [0025] for support, however, it does not specifically support "a non-PoE power source directly connected to the PD consumer device". For purpose of this Office action, Examiner going to interpret this limitation as "a non-PoE power source connected to the PD consumer device". Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-4, 7-11 and 15-18 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Heath et al. (USPN: 2012/0303981), hereinafter, Heath. As per claim 1, Heath teaches an apparatus, comprising: a first interface to a first direct-current-to-direct-current (DC/DC) power converter, the first DC/DC power converter to convert power from a first Ethernet port to provide power over Ethernet (POE) through a first POE front-end (FE) circuit to a powered device (PD) consumer device; a second interface to a second direct-current-to-direct-current (DC/DC) power converter, the second DC/DC power converter to convert power from a second Ethernet port to provide POE through a second POE FE circuit to the PD consumer device (i.e. a system for providing power is provided to a powered device (PD) in a POE/POE+ environment. The system provides power to a power converter, such as a DC/DC converter 116 or 102, that generates a power output required by the PD. An eight-wire Ethernet connector, such as a Registered Jack-45 (RJ-45) connector, is used for providing electrical connection to the Ethernet cabling; See Fig. 2 and [0055], [0062]); a non-PoE power source (i.e. the auxiliary power input (106)) connected to the PD consumer device (See Fig. 2 and [0055]); and a control circuit to: cause redundant power to be selectively provided to the PD consumer device from one or more of the first Ethernet port and the second Ethernet port; when the non-PoE power source is inactive: determine a power characteristic of the first POE FE circuit and the second POE FE circuit; the power characteristic comprising at least one of voltage, current, energy or power (i.e. based on the PoE/PoE+ voltage and the auxiliary power source voltage; see [0066]); and based on the non-PoE power source being inactive and the first power characteristic of the first POE FE circuit and the second POE FE circuit, determine a first portion of power from the first DC/DC power converter to provide to the PD consumer device and a second portion of power from the second DC/DC power converter to provide to the PD consumer device (i.e. the system further includes a control circuit that controls the power converter and the minimum load current circuit to provide seamless switching between the PoE/PoE power supply input and the auxiliary power supply input. When the auxiliary power is removed, the control circuit manages the delivery of power to the load; see [0065]-[0070]). As per claim 2, Heath further teaches that the control circuit is to, when the non-PoE power source is active, cause power to the PD consumer device from the first DC/DC power converter and the second DC/DC power converter to be disconnected (see [0069]-[0070]). As per claim 3, Heath further teaches that the first DC/DC power converter and the second DC/DC power converter are to electrically isolate the PD consumer device from the first POE FE circuit and the second POE FE circuit (see [0071]-[0072]). As per claim 4, Heath further teaches that the control circuit is to: cause measurement of a power characteristic of a secondary side of the first DC/DC power converter and of a secondary side of the second DC/DC power converter; and cause determination of a power characteristic of a primary side of the first DC/DC power converter and of a primary side of the second DC/DC power converter (see [0081] and [0086]). As per claim 7, Heath further teaches that the control circuit is to communicate with the PD consumer device and determine power needs of the PD consumer device; the non-PoE power source, the first DC/DC power converter, and the second DC/DC power converter are connected to provide power to the PD consumer device in parallel; and the control circuit is to selectively enable a combination of the first DC/DC power converter and the second DC/DC power converter to power the PD consumer device (see [0066]-[0068]). As per claims 8-11 and 14, refer to the rejection of claims 1-4 and 7, respectively. Claims 8-11 and 14 are also rejected based on same rationale as the rejection of claims 1-4 and 7, respectively. As per claims 15-18, refer to the rejection of claims 1-4, respectively. Claims 15-18 are also rejected based on same rationale as the rejection of claims 1-4, respectively. Remarks The 4/29/2026 amendments to claims, specification and drawings have overcome the objections to claims, specification and drawings, respectively. Thus, those objections are withdrawn. The 4/29/2026 amendments to claims have overcome the prior §112(b) rejection. Thus, they are withdrawn. Applicant’s arguments with respect to rejections made using Huff prior art is moot as those rejections are withdrawn. Examiner disagree with Applicant’s allegation that the auxiliary power input 106 of Heath is not directly connected to PD consumer device because (i) as indicated below in the 112(a) rejection above, the current spec does not support the newly added limitation of "a non-PoE power source directly connected to the PD consumer device", and (ii) Heath, in [0055], clearly discloses that “the system may include an auxiliary power supply channel 106 for providing power from an auxiliary AC or DC power source such as a wall transformer”. Conclusion Claims 1-20 are rejected THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Hetul Patel whose telephone number is (571)272-4184. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9am-5pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /HETUL B PATEL/ Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 3992
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 03, 2024
Application Filed
Jan 30, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §112
Apr 09, 2026
Interview Requested
Apr 16, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Apr 16, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
Apr 29, 2026
Response Filed
Aug 04, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12625970
PROVIDING BIOS FEATURES IN A PRE-BOOT ENVIRONMENT FOR A CLIENT COMPUTER SYSTEM
1y 8m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 8255618
PERFORMANCE ISOLATION IN A SHARED MEMORY DEVICE
10m to grant Granted Aug 28, 2012
Patent 8234473
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR BACKUP AND RECOVERY USING STORAGE BASED JOURNALING
2y 0m to grant Granted Jul 31, 2012
Patent 8219754
NOVEL CONTEXT INSTRUCTION CACHE ARCHITECTURE FOR A DIGITAL SIGNAL PROCESSOR
1y 12m to grant Granted Jul 10, 2012
Patent 8214622
FACILITATING MANAGEMENT OF STORAGE OF A PAGEABLE MODE VIRTUAL ENVIRONMENT ABSENT INTERVENTION OF A HOST OF THE ENVIRONMENT
8y 1m to grant Granted Jul 03, 2012
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
63%
Grant Probability
66%
With Interview (+3.3%)
3y 3m (~1y 3m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 209 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month