Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 17, 2026
Application No. 18/906,090

METHOD FOR EXCHANGING FUNCTIONALITY INFORMATION BETWEEN UE AND NETWORK

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Oct 03, 2024
Examiner
ACOLATSE, KODZOVI
Art Unit
2478
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Sharp Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
84%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
8m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 84% — above average
84%
Career Allowance Rate
783 granted / 935 resolved
+25.7% vs TC avg
Strong +21% interview lift
Without
With
+21.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
51 currently pending
Career history
989
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
5.5%
-34.5% vs TC avg
§103
54.9%
+14.9% vs TC avg
§102
22.3%
-17.7% vs TC avg
§112
9.1%
-30.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 935 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . This is responsive to application 19/906,090 filed 10/03/2024 in which claims 1-15 are presented for examination. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-15 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Kwak et al (US 2026/0082274 A1). Regarding claim 1, Kwak teaches a user equipment (UE) (Kwak: Figs. 2-3, WTRU/UE), comprising: one or more non-transitory computer-readable media storing one or more computer-executable instructions; and at least one processor coupled to the one or more non-transitory computer-readable media, and configured to execute the one or more computer-executable instructions to cause the UE to: receive cell information, via a serving cell, the cell information comprising one or more network-side conditions and an associated identifier (ID) of at least one cell (Kwak: Figs. 2-3; [0103], [0133],[0149], WTRU receives network cell ID and network conditions); evaluate one or more functionalities of the at least one cell based on the cell information; report evaluation results of the one or more functionalities of the at least one cell to the serving cell (Kwak: Figs. 2-3; [0098]-[0110], [0110], WTRU performs measurement and reporting to the network). Regarding claim 15, Kwak teaches a method by a user equipment (UE), the method comprising: receiving cell information via a serving cell, the cell information comprising one or more network-side conditions and an associated identifier (ID) of at least one cell (Kwak: Figs. 2-3; [0103], [0133],[0149], WTRU receives network cell ID and network conditions); evaluating one or more functionalities of the at least one cell based on the cell information; reporting evaluation results of the one or more functionalities of the at least one cell to the serving cel (Kwak: Figs. 2-3; [0098]-[0110], [0110], WTRU performs measurement and reporting to the network). Regarding claim 2, Kwak teaches wherein the at least one processor is further configured to execute the one or more computer-executable instructions to cause the UE to: receive one or more functionality key performance indicator (KPI) thresholds associated with the one or more functionalities of at least one cell (Kwak: [0131], [0175] KPI thresholds received); determine whether a reporting event is triggered based on at least one of the one or more functionality KPI thresholds, mobility scenarios, and UE-specific parameters, scenarios and conditions, wherein the reporting of the evaluation results is in response to the reporting event being triggered (Kwak: [0135], [0202]-[0203] event-triggered and WTRU reporting to the network). Regarding claim 3, Kwak teaches wherein the one or more functionality KPI thresholds comprise artificial intelligence/machine learning (AI/ML) functionality KPI thresholds (Kwak: [0131], [0175] AI/ML KPI thresholds). Regarding claim 4, Kwak teaches wherein the evaluation results of the one or more functionalities are reported to the serving cell in response to a change in an observed artificial intelligence/machine learning (AI/ML) functionality KPI range (Kwak: [0131], [0175], [0202]-[0203] event-triggered and WTRU reporting to the network). Regarding claim 5, Kwak teaches wherein the at least one processor is further configured to execute the one or more computer-executable instructions to cause the UE to: prior to receiving the cell information, send a measurement report to the serving cell in response to a triggering event (Kwak: [0135], [0202]-[0203] event-triggered and WTRU reporting to the network). Regarding claim 6, Kwak teaches wherein the measurement report includes measurements of channel quality of the at least one cell (Kwak: [0098]-[0100], [0135], [0202]-[0203] event-triggered and WTRU reporting to the network). Regarding claim 7, Kwak teaches wherein the evaluation results of the one or more functionalities are reported to the serving cell in response to: a measurement parameter of the serving cell falling below a first threshold, or a measurement parameter of the at least one cell exceeding a second threshold (Kwak: [0084], [0135], [0202]-[0203] event-triggered and WTRU reporting to the network based on threshold not being met, i.e. less than or exceeding). Regarding claim 8, Kwak teaches wherein the at least one cell comprises the serving cell (Kwak: [0004]-[0010]). Regarding claim 9, Kwak teaches wherein the at least one cell comprises a neighboring cell (Kwak: [0004]-[0010]; [0107]-[0108] adjacent cells). Regarding claim 10, Kwak teaches wherein the cell information further comprises one or more functionality configurations of the at least one cell (Kwak: Figs. 2-3; [0103], [0133],[0149], WTRU receives network cell ID and network conditions). Regarding claim 11, Kwak teaches wherein the UE evaluates the one or more functionalities of the at least one cell based on at least one of: one or more functionality KPI thresholds, one or more associated IDs, the one or more network-side conditions, functionality or inference configurations, the UE’s internal parameters, and model availability (Kwak: [0098]-[0100], [0135], [0202]-[0203] event-triggered and WTRU reporting to the network). Regarding claim 12, Kwak teaches wherein the evaluation results comprise an indication of whether at least one of the one or more functionalities is a functionality applicable for the at least one cell (Kwak: [0098]-[0100], [0135], [0202]-[0203] event-triggered and WTRU reporting to the network). Regarding claim 13, Kwak teaches wherein the at least one processor is further configured to execute the one or more computer-executable instructions to cause the UE to: receive one or more functionality key performance indicator (KPI) thresholds associated with the one or more functionalities of at least one cell; evaluate one or more functionality KPI thresholds; accept or reject the one or more functionality KPI thresholds based on the evaluation (Kwak: [0098]-[0100], [0135], [0202]-[0203] event-triggered and WTRU reporting to the network). Regarding claim 14, Kwak teaches wherein the at least one processor is further configured to execute the one or more computer-executable instructions to cause the UE to: monitor a functionality key performance indicator (KPI) range of at least one of the one or more functionalities (Kwak: [0098]-[0100], [0135], [0202]-[0203] event-triggered and WTRU reporting to the network). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to KODZOVI ACOLATSE whose telephone number is (571)270-1999. The examiner can normally be reached Monday to Friday 10 am to 6pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Avellino Joseph can be reached at (571) 272-3905. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /KODZOVI ACOLATSE/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2478
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 03, 2024
Application Filed
Oct 02, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Jul 16, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12706853
TIMESTAMP SYNCHRONIZATION BETWEEN HOST AND NETWORK INTERFACE DEVICE
4y 4m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12707346
HANDOVER MANAGEMENT IN A SYNCHRONIZATION SYSTEM
3y 6m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12707341
INTEGRATION OF PROACTIVITY IN WIRELESS NETWORKS VIA TARGETED-CONTRACTS
2y 11m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12707465
EFFICIENT TECHNIQUES FOR RESOURCE SELECTION ASSISTANCE REPORTING FOR NR REL-17 SIDELINK
2y 5m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12701574
ELECTRONIC APPARATUS, BASE STATION, COMMUNICATION SYSTEM, METHOD, AND STORAGE MEDIUM
3y 10m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
84%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+21.1%)
2y 6m (~8m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 935 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month