Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/906,245

ULTRASOUND-RESPONSIVE NANOSCALE DELIVERY PLATFORM FOR USE IN THE TREATMENT OF BIOFILM-ASSOCIATED DISEASES

Non-Final OA §102§112
Filed
Oct 04, 2024
Priority
Nov 16, 2023 — provisional 63/599,777
Examiner
MERCIER, MELISSA S
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Aurapeutics Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
72%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 0m
Est. Remaining
78%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 72% — above average
72%
Career Allowance Rate
862 granted / 1197 resolved
+12.0% vs TC avg
Moderate +6% lift
Without
With
+6.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 10m
Avg Prosecution
36 currently pending
Career history
1239
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.9%
-39.1% vs TC avg
§103
60.8%
+20.8% vs TC avg
§102
7.0%
-33.0% vs TC avg
§112
6.5%
-33.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1197 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Status of Application Claims 1-9 are pending in this application. No claims have been amended or cancelled. All pending claims are under examination in this application. Information Disclosure Statement Receipt of the Information Disclosure Statement filed on May 12, 2026 is acknowledged. A signed copy is attached to this office action. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claim 6 rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Regarding claim 6, the phrase "such as" renders the claim indefinite because it is unclear whether the limitations following the phrase are part of the claimed invention. See MPEP § 2173.05(d). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-9 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Xin et al. (Ultrasound-Activatable Phase Shift Nanoparticle as a Targeting Antibacterial Agent for Efficient Eradication of Pseudomonas aeruginosa Biofilms, Applied Materials and Interfaces 2022, 14, 47420-47431). Xin discloses ultrasound-activatable targeted nanoparticles designed by using poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA) nanoparticles to encapsulate phase transformable perfluoropentane (PFP) and the antibiotic meropenem via a double emulsion approach, followed by conjugation with anti-P aeruginosa antibodies. The nanoparticles eradicated biofilms effectively and cleared bacteria in vitro as well as exhibited potent anti-infective activity in vivo (abstract). Regarding claim 2, because meropenem lacks a strong chemical handle to form permanent covalent attachments to PLGA, it relies on several non-covalent forces. Regarding claim 3, as noted above, nanoparticles designed by using poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA) nanoparticles to encapsulate phase transformable perfluoropentane (PFP) and the antibiotic meropenem. Regarding claim 4, as noted above, the shell is made of PLGA, a polymer. Regarding claim 5, the nanoparticles have a diameter of 215.6 nm (section 3.1). Regarding claim 6, as noted above, the nanoparticles are disclosed to eradicate Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms. It is noted Pseudomonas aeruginosa is a bacterium. Regarding claim 7, Pseudomonas aeruginosa is a Gram-negative bacterium and a frequently utilized model organism for biofilm-focused research that is also capable of causing urinary tract infections and infections associated with conditions such as cystic fibrosis and burn wounds in humans (section 1). Regarding claims 8-9, treatment of wounds/biofilms by topical application was disclosed (figure 6; section 3.7; conclusions). Xin, therefore, anticipates the rejected claims. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MELISSA S MERCIER whose telephone number is (571)272-9039. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 6:30 am to 4 pm EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Robert A Wax can be reached at 571-272-0623. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /MELISSA S MERCIER/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1615
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 04, 2024
Application Filed
Jun 10, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12673049
Pharmaceutical Composition Containing Dabigatran Etexilate And Preparation Method Thereof
3y 0m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12673025
PEGYLATED LIPOSOMES AND USES THEREOF
2y 3m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12661324
SOLID DISPERSION, PHARMACEUTICAL PREPARATIONS, PREPARATION METHOD, AND APPLICATION THEREOF
3y 1m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12653782
CONTROLLED RELEASE CONCENTRATE AND SUSPENSIONS INCLUDING THE SAME
5y 9m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12653778
DRY POWDER FORMULATIONS OF EPINEPHRINE AND ASSOCIATED METHODS
9m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
72%
Grant Probability
78%
With Interview (+6.2%)
2y 10m (~1y 0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1197 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month