Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 14, 2026
Application No. 18/906,321

METHOD, SYSTEM AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE OF DATE COMMUNICATION

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Oct 04, 2024
Priority
Jul 31, 2024 — CN 202411045828.9 +1 more
Examiner
TON, DANG T
Art Unit
2476
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Dalian University
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
88%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
4m
Est. Remaining
90%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 88% — above average
88%
Career Allowance Rate
533 granted / 602 resolved
+30.5% vs TC avg
Minimal +1% lift
Without
With
+1.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 2m
Avg Prosecution
19 currently pending
Career history
642
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
4.0%
-36.0% vs TC avg
§103
44.9%
+4.9% vs TC avg
§102
26.1%
-13.9% vs TC avg
§112
8.1%
-31.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 602 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-3 and 9 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Belleres Montero ( 2021/0061494) in view of Choquette ( 2020/0029265). For independent claim 1, Belleres Montero ( 2021/0061494) discloses a system comprising receiving data name information uploaded by a producer through a pre-built satellite data depot; the satellite data depot comprises at least three geosynchronous earth orbit satellites and several low-orbit satellites, and the data name information characterizes data produced by the producer ( See Figure 1 boxes 12,12, and 14). For independent claim1, Belleres Montero ( 2021/0061494) discloses all the subject matter of the claimed invention with the exception of updating the data in the satellite data depot based on the data name information in a communications network. Choquette ( 2020/0029265) from the same or similar fields of endeavor teaches a provision of updating the data in the satellite data depot based on the data name information in a communications network ( See paragraphs 0097 lines 1-10 and 0090 lines 1-8). Thus, it would have been obvious to the person of ordinary skill in the art at the time of the invention before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to use updating the data in the satellite data depot based on the data name information in a communications network as taught by Choquette ( 2020/0029265) in the communications network of Belleres Montero ( 2021/0061494) for the purpose of updating the data in the satellite data depot based on the data name information. For independent claim 9 is rejected for the same reason as claim 1. For dependent claims 2-3, Belleres Montero ( 2021/0061494) discloses all the subject matter of the claimed invention with the exception of forwarding a request packet to the producer if the satellite data depot receives the request packet of the consumer; and receiving a data packet uploaded by the producer based on the request packet and forwarding the data packet to the consumer through the satellite data depot and wherein the forwarding a request packet to the producer if the satellite data depot receives the request packet of the consumer comprises: receiving the request packet of the consumer through the low-orbit satellites; marking the request packet based on the data name information; and routing the request packet to the producer based on markings. Choquette ( 2020/0029265) from the same or similar fields of endeavor teaches a provision of forwarding a request packet to the producer if the satellite data depot receives the request packet of the consumer; and receiving a data packet uploaded by the producer based on the request packet and forwarding the data packet to the consumer through the satellite data depot and wherein the forwarding a request packet to the producer if the satellite data depot receives the request packet of the consumer comprises: receiving the request packet of the consumer through the low-orbit satellites; marking the request packet based on the data name information; and routing the request packet to the producer based on markings( See paragraphs 0097 lines 1-10 and 0099 lines 1-8). Thus, it would have been obvious to the person of ordinary skill in the art at the time of the invention before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to use forwarding a request packet to the producer if the satellite data depot receives the request packet of the consumer; and receiving a data packet uploaded by the producer based on the request packet and forwarding the data packet to the consumer through the satellite data depot and wherein the forwarding a request packet to the producer if the satellite data depot receives the request packet of the consumer comprises: receiving the request packet of the consumer through the low-orbit satellites; marking the request packet based on the data name information; and routing the request packet to the producer based on markings as taught by Choquette ( 2020/0029265) in the communications network of Belleres Montero ( 2021/0061494) for the purpose of routing the request packet to the producer based on markings. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim 10 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Belleres Montero ( 2021/0061494) in view of Choquette ( 2020/0029265) in view of Nam et al. (2016/0157218). For Claim 10, Belleres Montero ( 2021/0061494) in view of Choquette ( 2020/0029265) disclose all the subject matter of the claimed invention with the exception of memory, processor and a non-transitory computer readable medium having executable codes in a communications network. Nam et al. from the same or similar fields of endeavor teaches a provision of the memory, processor and a non-transitory computer readable medium having executable codes ( See paragraphs 0014 and 0052). Thus, it would have been obvious to the person of ordinary skill in the art at the time of the invention to use memory, processor and a non-transitory computer readable medium having executable codes as taught by Nam et al. in the communication network of Belleres Montero ( 2021/0061494) in view of Choquette ( 2020/0029265) for the purpose of storing codes in the memory to execute the process by the processor. The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Gopal et al. (2-18/0098247) is cited to show a system which is considered pertinent to the claimed invention. Claims 4-8 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to DANG T TON whose telephone number is (571)272-3171. The examiner can normally be reached Monday to Friday 5:30 AM to 3:00 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Ayaz Sheikh can be reached at 571-272-3795. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /DANG T TON/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2476 /D.T.T/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2476
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 04, 2024
Application Filed
Jul 22, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12707528
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR UPDATING RNA DURING SDT IN WIRELESS COMMUNICATION SYSTEM
2y 11m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12701087
SWITCH AND SCHEDULING METHOD FOR SWITCH
2y 3m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12677333
WIRELESS DEVICE CONNECTION ESTABLISHMENT AND CONFIRMATION WITH ENHANCED VIRTUAL ASSISTANT FUNCTIONS
3y 3m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12669949
SERVICE LEVEL PORT OVERSUBSCRIPTION
2y 3m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12665654
TECHNIQUES FOR DIRECTIONAL SIGNAL STRENGTH INDICATION AND BEAM-SPECIFIC MEASUREMENT THRESHOLD
3y 1m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
88%
Grant Probability
90%
With Interview (+1.1%)
2y 2m (~4m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 602 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month