Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/906,554

CONNECTOR FOR FUEL STRINGER DUCT

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Oct 04, 2024
Priority
Oct 16, 2023 — GB 2315804.1
Examiner
KEE, FANNIE C
Art Unit
3679
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Airbus SAS
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
70%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
1y 4m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 70% — above average
70%
Career Allowance Rate
547 granted / 782 resolved
+17.9% vs TC avg
Strong +29% interview lift
Without
With
+29.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 4m
Avg Prosecution
17 currently pending
Career history
811
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.5%
-39.5% vs TC avg
§103
33.5%
-6.5% vs TC avg
§102
35.0%
-5.0% vs TC avg
§112
28.7%
-11.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 782 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 6/25/26 has been entered. Claim Status Claims 1, 3-5 and 8-14 are pending. Examiner acknowledges Applicant’s amendments to claims 1, 3, 10 and 12, canceled claims 2, 6 and 7 and new claim 14. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claim(s) 1, 3-5 and 8-14 have been considered but are moot because of the new ground of rejection set forth below. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1 and 14 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Powell U.S. Patent No. 1,616,390. With regard to claim 1, and as shown in Fig 4, Powell discloses a fuel stringer duct connector for connecting a fluid flow duct to a fuel stringer duct, the fuel stringer duct connector comprising (as shown in Fig 4 below): a body, the body comprising a first opening on a first face, a second opening on a second face, the second face configured for connection with the fluid flow duct, an internal channel for fluid passage between the first opening and the second opening, and a flange that surrounds the first opening on the first face, the flange configured for insertion into a hole formed in a wall of the fuel stringer duct (where the flange is capable of being configured to be inserted into a hole in a wall of a fuel stringer duct), wherein an outer surface of the flange is provided with a first sealing member that surrounds the flange, the first sealing member configured to form a seal between the outer surface of the flange and an internal surface of the hole formed in the wall of the fuel stringer duct (wherein the seal is capable of being configured to form a seal between internal and external surfaces), wherein the first sealing member is spaced apart from the first face of the body (where the first sealing member is spaced axially apart from the first face of the body as shown in Fig 4), and wherein the fuel stringer duct connector comprises bridging members that extend from the body at opposing sides of the first opening, the bridging members configured to bridge over the fuel stringer duct at either side of the fuel stringer duct, wherein the bridging members comprise a foot for securing the fuel stringer duct connector to a surface at either side of the fuel stringer duct. PNG media_image1.png 316 348 media_image1.png Greyscale With regard to claim 14, and as shown in Fig 4, Powell discloses a fuel stringer duct connector for connecting a fluid flow duct to a fuel stringer duct, the fuel stringer duct connector comprising (as shown in Fig 4 below): a body, the body comprising a first opening on a first face, a second opening on a second face, the second face configured for connection with the fluid flow duct, an internal channel for fluid passage between the first opening and the second opening, and a flange that surrounds the first opening on the first face, the flange configured for insertion into a hole formed in a wall of the fuel stringer duct (where the flange is capable of being configured to be inserted into a hole in a wall of a fuel stringer duct), wherein an outer surface of the flange is provided with a first sealing member that surrounds the flange, the first sealing member configured to form a seal between the outer surface of the flange and an internal surface of the hole formed in the wall of the fuel stringer duct, wherein the first sealing member is spaced apart from the first face of the body (where the first sealing member is spaced axially apart from the first face of the body as shown in Fig 4), and wherein the fuel stringer duct connector is provided with holes for fastening the fuel stringer duct connector to the fuel stringer duct. PNG media_image2.png 316 348 media_image2.png Greyscale Claim(s) 14 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Vogl U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2019/0017643 A1. With regard to claim 14, and as shown in Fig 10, Powell discloses a fuel stringer duct connector for connecting a fluid flow duct to a fuel stringer duct, the fuel stringer duct connector comprising (as shown in Fig 10 below): a body, the body comprising a first opening on a first face, a second opening on a second face, the second face configured for connection with the fluid flow duct, an internal channel for fluid passage between the first opening and the second opening, and a flange that surrounds the first opening on the first face, the flange configured for insertion into a hole formed in a wall of the fuel stringer duct, wherein an outer surface of the flange is provided with a first sealing member that surrounds the flange, the first sealing member configured to form a seal between the outer surface of the flange and an internal surface of the hole formed in the wall of the fuel stringer duct, wherein the first sealing member is spaced apart from the first face of the body (as shown in Fig 10), and wherein the fuel stringer duct connector is provided with holes for fastening the fuel stringer duct connector to the fuel stringer duct. PNG media_image3.png 532 464 media_image3.png Greyscale Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 3-5 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Powell. With regard to claim 3, Powell discloses the claimed invention but does not disclose that the first sealing member is spaced apart from the first face of the body by between approximately 2 and 6 millimeters. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have the first sealing member be spaced apart from the first face of the body by between approximately 2 and 6 millimeters with a reasonable expectation of success to allow for a more secure connection and because a change in the size of a prior art device is a design consideration within the skill of the art. In re Rose, 220 F.2d 459, 105 USPQ 237 (CCPA 1955). With regard to claim 4, Powell discloses the claimed invention but does not disclose that the first sealing member is an o-ring. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have the first sealing member be an o-ring with a reasonable expectation as o-rings provide good sealing protection, are readily available and because it has been held to be within the general skill of a worker in the art to select a known element for use on the basis of its suitability for the intended use as a matter of obvious design choice. With regard to claim 5, Powell discloses the claimed invention but does not disclose that the outer surface of the flange is formed with a groove which extends around a circumference of the flange and the o-ring is situated within the groove. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have the outer surface of the flange be formed with a groove which extends around a circumference of the flange and to have the o-ring be situated within the groove with a reasonable expectation to engage the o-ring securely and because a change in the shape of a prior art device is a design consideration within the level of skill of one skilled in the art. In re Dailey, 357 F.2d 669, 149 USPQ 47 (CCPA 1966). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 8-13 are allowed. Claims 12 and 13 were previously allowed. With regard to claim 8, the prior art of record does not teach an aircraft structure comprising a fuel stringer duct and the fuel stringer duct connector according to claim 1 wherein the flange of the fuel stringer duct connector is positioned within the hole, and the first sealing member forms a seal between the outer surface of the flange and an internal surface of the hole, the first sealing member being positioned between opposing surfaces of the wall. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to FANNIE KEE whose telephone number is (571)272-1820. The examiner can normally be reached 8am-5pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Matthew Troutman can be reached at 571-270-3654. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /F.K./Examiner, Art Unit 3679 /Matthew Troutman/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 3679
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 04, 2024
Application Filed
Dec 12, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103
Mar 03, 2026
Response Filed
Mar 26, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103
May 22, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Jun 25, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Jul 03, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Jul 23, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12729792
Coupling for double-walled tubes
2y 0m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12729793
FITTING COLLAR AND TUBE-FITTING ASSEMBLIES INCORPORATING FITTING COLLARS
1y 1m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12716535
CONNECTOR WITH GUIDING COMPONENTS
3y 9m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Patent 12692959
PRESS FITTING DEVICE, COMPONENTS AND METHOD
1y 9m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12680639
Genderless Aseptic Connector
5y 0m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
70%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+29.2%)
3y 4m (~1y 4m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 782 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month